btrfs: use existing cur_devices, cleanup btrfs_rm_device
Instead of de-referencing the device->fs_devices use cur_devices which points to the same fs_devices and does not change. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b6ed73bcb1
commit
41a52a0f1b
|
@ -2015,20 +2015,25 @@ int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, const char *device_path,
|
||||||
* (super_copy) should hold the device list mutex.
|
* (super_copy) should hold the device list mutex.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* In normal cases the cur_devices == fs_devices. But in case
|
||||||
|
* of deleting a seed device, the cur_devices should point to
|
||||||
|
* its own fs_devices listed under the fs_devices->seed.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
cur_devices = device->fs_devices;
|
cur_devices = device->fs_devices;
|
||||||
mutex_lock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
|
mutex_lock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
|
||||||
list_del_rcu(&device->dev_list);
|
list_del_rcu(&device->dev_list);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
device->fs_devices->num_devices--;
|
cur_devices->num_devices--;
|
||||||
device->fs_devices->total_devices--;
|
cur_devices->total_devices--;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_MISSING, &device->dev_state))
|
if (test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_MISSING, &device->dev_state))
|
||||||
device->fs_devices->missing_devices--;
|
cur_devices->missing_devices--;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
btrfs_assign_next_active_device(fs_info, device, NULL);
|
btrfs_assign_next_active_device(fs_info, device, NULL);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (device->bdev) {
|
if (device->bdev) {
|
||||||
device->fs_devices->open_devices--;
|
cur_devices->open_devices--;
|
||||||
/* remove sysfs entry */
|
/* remove sysfs entry */
|
||||||
btrfs_sysfs_rm_device_link(fs_devices, device);
|
btrfs_sysfs_rm_device_link(fs_devices, device);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue