selftests: mlxsw: Add TC flower test for Spectrum-2

Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Ido Schimmel 2018-08-09 11:59:10 +03:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent c86d62cc41
commit 3dd9157056
1 changed files with 366 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -0,0 +1,366 @@
#!/bin/bash
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
# This test is for checking the A-TCAM and C-TCAM operation in Spectrum-2.
# It tries to exercise as many code paths in the eRP state machine as
# possible.
lib_dir=$(dirname $0)/../../../../net/forwarding
ALL_TESTS="single_mask_test identical_filters_test two_masks_test \
multiple_masks_test ctcam_edge_cases_test"
NUM_NETIFS=2
source $lib_dir/tc_common.sh
source $lib_dir/lib.sh
tcflags="skip_hw"
h1_create()
{
simple_if_init $h1 192.0.2.1/24 198.51.100.1/24
}
h1_destroy()
{
simple_if_fini $h1 192.0.2.1/24 198.51.100.1/24
}
h2_create()
{
simple_if_init $h2 192.0.2.2/24 198.51.100.2/24
tc qdisc add dev $h2 clsact
}
h2_destroy()
{
tc qdisc del dev $h2 clsact
simple_if_fini $h2 192.0.2.2/24 198.51.100.2/24
}
single_mask_test()
{
# When only a single mask is required, the device uses the master
# mask and not the eRP table. Verify that under this mode the right
# filter is matched
RET=0
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower \
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
-t ip -q
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 101 1
check_err $? "Single filter - did not match"
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower \
$tcflags dst_ip 198.51.100.2 action drop
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
-t ip -q
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 101 2
check_err $? "Two filters - did not match highest priority"
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 198.51.100.1 -B 198.51.100.2 \
-t ip -q
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 102 1
check_err $? "Two filters - did not match lowest priority"
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 198.51.100.1 -B 198.51.100.2 \
-t ip -q
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 102 2
check_err $? "Single filter - did not match after delete"
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower
log_test "single mask test ($tcflags)"
}
identical_filters_test()
{
# When two filters that only differ in their priority are used,
# one needs to be inserted into the C-TCAM. This test verifies
# that filters are correctly spilled to C-TCAM and that the right
# filter is matched
RET=0
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower \
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower \
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
-t ip -q
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 101 1
check_err $? "Did not match A-TCAM filter"
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
-t ip -q
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 102 1
check_err $? "Did not match C-TCAM filter after A-TCAM delete"
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 3 handle 103 flower \
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
-t ip -q
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 102 2
check_err $? "Did not match C-TCAM filter after A-TCAM add"
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
-t ip -q
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 103 1
check_err $? "Did not match A-TCAM filter after C-TCAM delete"
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 3 handle 103 flower
log_test "identical filters test ($tcflags)"
}
two_masks_test()
{
# When more than one mask is required, the eRP table is used. This
# test verifies that the eRP table is correctly allocated and used
RET=0
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower \
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 3 handle 103 flower \
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.0.0/16 action drop
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
-t ip -q
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 101 1
check_err $? "Two filters - did not match highest priority"
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
-t ip -q
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 103 1
check_err $? "Single filter - did not match"
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower \
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.0/24 action drop
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
-t ip -q
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 102 1
check_err $? "Two filters - did not match highest priority after add"
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 3 handle 103 flower
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower
log_test "two masks test ($tcflags)"
}
multiple_masks_test()
{
# The number of masks in a region is limited. Once the maximum
# number of masks has been reached filters that require new
# masks are spilled to the C-TCAM. This test verifies that
# spillage is performed correctly and that the right filter is
# matched
local index
RET=0
NUM_MASKS=32
BASE_INDEX=100
for i in $(eval echo {1..$NUM_MASKS}); do
index=$((BASE_INDEX - i))
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref $index \
handle $index \
flower $tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2/${i} src_ip 192.0.2.1 \
action drop
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 \
-B 192.0.2.2 -t ip -q
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" $index 1
check_err $? "$i filters - did not match highest priority (add)"
done
for i in $(eval echo {$NUM_MASKS..1}); do
index=$((BASE_INDEX - i))
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 \
-B 192.0.2.2 -t ip -q
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" $index 2
check_err $? "$i filters - did not match highest priority (del)"
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref $index \
handle $index flower
done
log_test "multiple masks test ($tcflags)"
}
ctcam_two_atcam_masks_test()
{
RET=0
# First case: C-TCAM is disabled when there are two A-TCAM masks.
# We push a filter into the C-TCAM by using two identical filters
# as in identical_filters_test()
# Filter goes into A-TCAM
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower \
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
# Filter goes into C-TCAM
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower \
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
# Filter goes into A-TCAM
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 3 handle 103 flower \
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.0/24 action drop
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
-t ip -q
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 101 1
check_err $? "Did not match A-TCAM filter"
# Delete both A-TCAM and C-TCAM filters and make sure the remaining
# A-TCAM filter still works
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
-t ip -q
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 103 1
check_err $? "Did not match A-TCAM filter"
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 3 handle 103 flower
log_test "ctcam with two atcam masks test ($tcflags)"
}
ctcam_one_atcam_mask_test()
{
RET=0
# Second case: C-TCAM is disabled when there is one A-TCAM mask.
# The test is similar to identical_filters_test()
# Filter goes into A-TCAM
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower \
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
# Filter goes into C-TCAM
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower \
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
-t ip -q
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 101 1
check_err $? "Did not match C-TCAM filter"
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower
$MZ $h1 -c 1 -p 64 -a $h1mac -b $h2mac -A 192.0.2.1 -B 192.0.2.2 \
-t ip -q
tc_check_packets "dev $h2 ingress" 102 1
check_err $? "Did not match A-TCAM filter"
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower
log_test "ctcam with one atcam mask test ($tcflags)"
}
ctcam_no_atcam_masks_test()
{
RET=0
# Third case: C-TCAM is disabled when there are no A-TCAM masks
# This test exercises the code path that transitions the eRP table
# to its initial state after deleting the last C-TCAM mask
# Filter goes into A-TCAM
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower \
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
# Filter goes into C-TCAM
tc filter add dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower \
$tcflags dst_ip 192.0.2.2 action drop
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower
tc filter del dev $h2 ingress protocol ip pref 2 handle 102 flower
log_test "ctcam with no atcam masks test ($tcflags)"
}
ctcam_edge_cases_test()
{
# When the C-TCAM is disabled after deleting the last C-TCAM
# mask, we want to make sure the eRP state machine is put in
# the correct state
ctcam_two_atcam_masks_test
ctcam_one_atcam_mask_test
ctcam_no_atcam_masks_test
}
setup_prepare()
{
h1=${NETIFS[p1]}
h2=${NETIFS[p2]}
h1mac=$(mac_get $h1)
h2mac=$(mac_get $h2)
vrf_prepare
h1_create
h2_create
}
cleanup()
{
pre_cleanup
h2_destroy
h1_destroy
vrf_cleanup
}
trap cleanup EXIT
setup_prepare
setup_wait
tests_run
if ! tc_offload_check; then
check_err 1 "Could not test offloaded functionality"
log_test "mlxsw-specific tests for tc flower"
exit
else
tcflags="skip_sw"
tests_run
fi
exit $EXIT_STATUS