drm/i915/display_power: use struct drm_device based logging

Convert all the DRM_* logging macros to the struct drm_device based
macros to provide device specific logging.

No functional changes.

Generated using the following semantic patch, originally written by
Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@gmail.com>, with manual fixups on top:

@@
identifier fn, T;
@@

fn(...,struct drm_i915_private *T,...) {
<+...
(
-DRM_INFO(
+drm_info(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_NOTE(
+drm_notice(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_ERROR(
+drm_err(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_WARN(
+drm_warn(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER(
+drm_dbg(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_KMS(
+drm_dbg_kms(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC(
+drm_dbg_atomic(&T->drm,
...)
)
...+>
}

@@
identifier fn, T;
@@

fn(...) {
...
struct drm_i915_private *T = ...;
<+...
(
-DRM_INFO(
+drm_info(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_NOTE(
+drm_notice(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_ERROR(
+drm_err(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_WARN(
+drm_warn(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER(
+drm_dbg(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_KMS(
+drm_dbg_kms(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC(
+drm_dbg_atomic(&T->drm,
...)
)
...+>
}

Cc: Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/25e56d1b7df3b1e91024eb969fb839fdcbdcb35e.1584714939.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
This commit is contained in:
Jani Nikula 2020-03-20 16:36:27 +02:00
parent 47bdb1caba
commit 3c4e3870fa
1 changed files with 15 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@ -1873,11 +1873,14 @@ __async_put_domains_state_ok(struct i915_power_domains *power_domains)
static void print_power_domains(struct i915_power_domains *power_domains,
const char *prefix, u64 mask)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = container_of(power_domains,
struct drm_i915_private,
power_domains);
enum intel_display_power_domain domain;
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("%s (%lu):\n", prefix, hweight64(mask));
drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "%s (%lu):\n", prefix, hweight64(mask));
for_each_power_domain(domain, mask)
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("%s use_count %d\n",
drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "%s use_count %d\n",
intel_display_power_domain_str(domain),
power_domains->domain_use_count[domain]);
}
@ -1885,7 +1888,11 @@ static void print_power_domains(struct i915_power_domains *power_domains,
static void
print_async_put_domains_state(struct i915_power_domains *power_domains)
{
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("async_put_wakeref %u\n",
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = container_of(power_domains,
struct drm_i915_private,
power_domains);
drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "async_put_wakeref %u\n",
power_domains->async_put_wakeref);
print_power_domains(power_domains, "async_put_domains[0]",
@ -4480,7 +4487,8 @@ void icl_dbuf_slices_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
drm_WARN(&dev_priv->drm, hweight8(req_slices) > max_slices,
"Invalid number of dbuf slices requested\n");
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Updating dbuf slices to 0x%x\n", req_slices);
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Updating dbuf slices to 0x%x\n",
req_slices);
/*
* Might be running this in parallel to gen9_dc_off_power_well_enable