UbiquitousOS
/
OpenCloudOS-Kernel
mirror of https://gitee.com/OpenCloudOS/OpenCloudOS-Kernel.git
11
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

drm/i915: Relax the sprite scaling limits checks 

Reduce the size of the the src/dst viewport to keep the scalign ratios
in check.

v2: Below min size sprite handling squashed to previous patch

Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This commit is contained in:
Ville Syrjälä 2013-04-24 18:52:39 +03:00 committed by Daniel Vetter
parent 1731693a5a
commit 3c3686cd97
1 changed files with 28 additions and 20 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

48
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
View File

@ -681,26 +681,19 @@ intel_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
return -EINVAL;
}
/*
* FIXME the following code does a bunch of fuzzy adjustments to the
* coordinates and sizes. We probably need some way to decide whether
* more strict checking should be done instead.
*/
max_scale = intel_plane->max_downscale << 16;
min_scale = intel_plane->can_scale ? 1 : (1 << 16);
hscale = drm_rect_calc_hscale(&src, &dst, min_scale, max_scale);
if (hscale < 0) {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Horizontal scaling factor out of limits\n");
drm_rect_debug_print(&src, true);
drm_rect_debug_print(&dst, false);
hscale = drm_rect_calc_hscale_relaxed(&src, &dst, min_scale, max_scale);
BUG_ON(hscale < 0);
return hscale;
}
vscale = drm_rect_calc_vscale(&src, &dst, min_scale, max_scale);
if (vscale < 0) {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Vertical scaling factor out of limits\n");
drm_rect_debug_print(&src, true);
drm_rect_debug_print(&dst, false);
return vscale;
}
vscale = drm_rect_calc_vscale_relaxed(&src, &dst, min_scale, max_scale);
BUG_ON(vscale < 0);
visible = drm_rect_clip_scaled(&src, &dst, &clip, hscale, vscale);
@ -710,6 +703,25 @@ intel_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
crtc_h = drm_rect_height(&dst);
if (visible) {
/* check again in case clipping clamped the results */
hscale = drm_rect_calc_hscale(&src, &dst, min_scale, max_scale);
if (hscale < 0) {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Horizontal scaling factor out of limits\n");
drm_rect_debug_print(&src, true);
drm_rect_debug_print(&dst, false);
return hscale;
}
vscale = drm_rect_calc_vscale(&src, &dst, min_scale, max_scale);
if (vscale < 0) {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Vertical scaling factor out of limits\n");
drm_rect_debug_print(&src, true);
drm_rect_debug_print(&dst, false);
return vscale;
}
/* Make the source viewport size an exact multiple of the scaling factors. */
drm_rect_adjust_size(&src,
drm_rect_width(&dst) * hscale - drm_rect_width(&src),
@ -726,10 +738,6 @@ intel_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
* Adjust to (macro)pixel boundary, but be careful not to
* increase the source viewport size, because that could
* push the downscaling factor out of bounds.
*
* FIXME Should we be really strict and reject the
* config if it results in non (macro)pixel aligned
* coords?
*/
src_x = src.x1 >> 16;
src_w = drm_rect_width(&src) >> 16;