pppoatm: take ATM socket lock in pppoatm_send()
The pppoatm_send() does not take any lock that will prevent concurrent vcc_sendmsg(). This causes two problems: - there is no locking between checking the send queue size with atm_may_send() and incrementing sk_wmem_alloc, and the real queue size can be a little higher than sk_sndbuf - the vcc->sendmsg() can be called concurrently. I'm not sure if it's allowed. Some drivers (eni, nicstar, ...) seem to assume it will never happen. Now pppoatm_send() takes ATM socket lock, the same that is used in vcc_sendmsg() and other ATM socket functions. The pppoatm_send() is called with BH disabled, so bh_lock_sock() is used instead of lock_sock(). Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@podlesie.net> Cc: Chas Williams - CONTRACTOR <chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e41faed9cd
commit
3ac108006f
|
@ -272,10 +272,19 @@ static inline int pppoatm_may_send(struct pppoatm_vcc *pvcc, int size)
|
|||
static int pppoatm_send(struct ppp_channel *chan, struct sk_buff *skb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct pppoatm_vcc *pvcc = chan_to_pvcc(chan);
|
||||
struct atm_vcc *vcc;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc = pvcc->atmvcc;
|
||||
pr_debug("(skb=0x%p, vcc=0x%p)\n", skb, pvcc->atmvcc);
|
||||
if (skb->data[0] == '\0' && (pvcc->flags & SC_COMP_PROT))
|
||||
(void) skb_pull(skb, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
vcc = ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc;
|
||||
bh_lock_sock(sk_atm(vcc));
|
||||
if (sock_owned_by_user(sk_atm(vcc)))
|
||||
goto nospace;
|
||||
|
||||
switch (pvcc->encaps) { /* LLC encapsulation needed */
|
||||
case e_llc:
|
||||
if (skb_headroom(skb) < LLC_LEN) {
|
||||
|
@ -288,8 +297,10 @@ static int pppoatm_send(struct ppp_channel *chan, struct sk_buff *skb)
|
|||
}
|
||||
consume_skb(skb);
|
||||
skb = n;
|
||||
if (skb == NULL)
|
||||
if (skb == NULL) {
|
||||
bh_unlock_sock(sk_atm(vcc));
|
||||
return DROP_PACKET;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if (!pppoatm_may_send(pvcc, skb->truesize))
|
||||
goto nospace;
|
||||
memcpy(skb_push(skb, LLC_LEN), pppllc, LLC_LEN);
|
||||
|
@ -299,6 +310,7 @@ static int pppoatm_send(struct ppp_channel *chan, struct sk_buff *skb)
|
|||
goto nospace;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case e_autodetect:
|
||||
bh_unlock_sock(sk_atm(vcc));
|
||||
pr_debug("Trying to send without setting encaps!\n");
|
||||
kfree_skb(skb);
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
|
@ -308,9 +320,12 @@ static int pppoatm_send(struct ppp_channel *chan, struct sk_buff *skb)
|
|||
ATM_SKB(skb)->atm_options = ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc->atm_options;
|
||||
pr_debug("atm_skb(%p)->vcc(%p)->dev(%p)\n",
|
||||
skb, ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc, ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc->dev);
|
||||
return ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc->send(ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc, skb)
|
||||
ret = ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc->send(ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc, skb)
|
||||
? DROP_PACKET : 1;
|
||||
bh_unlock_sock(sk_atm(vcc));
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
nospace:
|
||||
bh_unlock_sock(sk_atm(vcc));
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We don't have space to send this SKB now, but we might have
|
||||
* already applied SC_COMP_PROT compression, so may need to undo
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue