btrfs: drop never met disk total bytes check in verify_one_dev_extent
Drop the condition in verify_one_dev_extent,
btrfs_device::disk_total_bytes is set even for a seed device. The
comment is wrong, the size is properly set when cloning the device.
Commit 1b3922a8bc
("btrfs: Use real device structure to verify
dev extent") introduced it but it's unclear why the total_disk_bytes
was 0.
Theoretically, all devices (including missing and seed) marked with the
BTRFS_DEV_STATE_IN_FS_METADATA flag gets the total_disk_bytes updated at
fill_device_from_item():
open_ctree()
btrfs_read_chunk_tree()
read_one_dev()
open_seed_device()
fill_device_from_item()
Even if verify_one_dev_extent() reports total_disk_bytes == 0, then its
a bug to be fixed somewhere else and not in verify_one_dev_extent() as
it's just a messenger. It is never expected that a total_disk_bytes
shall be zero.
The function fill_device_from_item() does the job of reading it from the
item and updating btrfs_device::disk_total_bytes. So both the missing
device and the seed devices do have their disk_total_bytes updated.
btrfs_find_device can also return a device from fs_info->seed_list
because it searches it as well.
Furthermore, while removing the device if there is a power loss, we
could have a device with its total_bytes = 0, that's still valid.
Instead, introduce a check against maximum block device size in
read_one_dev().
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bacce86ae8
commit
3a160a9331
|
@ -6869,6 +6869,16 @@ static int read_one_dev(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fill_device_from_item(leaf, dev_item, device);
|
||||
if (device->bdev) {
|
||||
u64 max_total_bytes = i_size_read(device->bdev->bd_inode);
|
||||
|
||||
if (device->total_bytes > max_total_bytes) {
|
||||
btrfs_err(fs_info,
|
||||
"device total_bytes should be at most %llu but found %llu",
|
||||
max_total_bytes, device->total_bytes);
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
set_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_IN_FS_METADATA, &device->dev_state);
|
||||
if (test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &device->dev_state) &&
|
||||
!test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT, &device->dev_state)) {
|
||||
|
@ -7598,21 +7608,6 @@ static int verify_one_dev_extent(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
|||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* It's possible this device is a dummy for seed device */
|
||||
if (dev->disk_total_bytes == 0) {
|
||||
struct btrfs_fs_devices *devs;
|
||||
|
||||
devs = list_first_entry(&fs_info->fs_devices->seed_list,
|
||||
struct btrfs_fs_devices, seed_list);
|
||||
dev = btrfs_find_device(devs, devid, NULL, NULL, false);
|
||||
if (!dev) {
|
||||
btrfs_err(fs_info, "failed to find seed devid %llu",
|
||||
devid);
|
||||
ret = -EUCLEAN;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (physical_offset + physical_len > dev->disk_total_bytes) {
|
||||
btrfs_err(fs_info,
|
||||
"dev extent devid %llu physical offset %llu len %llu is beyond device boundary %llu",
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue