drm/i915: handle FIFO oversubsription correctly
If you're pushing a plane hard (i.e. you need most or all of the FIFO entries just to cover your frame refresh latency), the watermark level may end up being negative. So fix up the signed vs. unsigned math in the calculation function to handle this correctly, giving all available FIFO entries to such a configuration. Reported-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> Tested-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
dff33cfcef
commit
390c4dd448
|
@ -1674,7 +1674,7 @@ static unsigned long intel_calculate_wm(unsigned long clock_in_khz,
|
|||
int pixel_size,
|
||||
unsigned long latency_ns)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned long entries_required, wm_size;
|
||||
long entries_required, wm_size;
|
||||
|
||||
entries_required = (clock_in_khz * pixel_size * latency_ns) / 1000000;
|
||||
entries_required /= wm->cacheline_size;
|
||||
|
@ -1685,9 +1685,10 @@ static unsigned long intel_calculate_wm(unsigned long clock_in_khz,
|
|||
|
||||
DRM_DEBUG("FIFO watermark level: %d\n", wm_size);
|
||||
|
||||
if (wm_size > wm->max_wm)
|
||||
/* Don't promote wm_size to unsigned... */
|
||||
if (wm_size > (long)wm->max_wm)
|
||||
wm_size = wm->max_wm;
|
||||
if (wm_size == 0)
|
||||
if (wm_size <= 0)
|
||||
wm_size = wm->default_wm;
|
||||
return wm_size;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue