[SCSI] sas_ata: Don't copy aic94xx's sactive to ata_port
Since the aic94xx sequencer assigns its own NCQ tags to ATA commands, it no longer makes any sense to copy the sactive field in the STP response to ata_port->sactive, as that will confuse libata. Also, libata seems to be capable of managing sactive on its own. The attached patch gets rid of one of the causes of the BUG messages in ata_qc_new, and seems to work without problems on an IBM x206m. Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1c50dc83f9
commit
38691593cd
|
@ -106,7 +106,6 @@ static void sas_ata_task_done(struct sas_task *task)
|
||||||
dev->sata_dev.sstatus = resp->sstatus;
|
dev->sata_dev.sstatus = resp->sstatus;
|
||||||
dev->sata_dev.serror = resp->serror;
|
dev->sata_dev.serror = resp->serror;
|
||||||
dev->sata_dev.scontrol = resp->scontrol;
|
dev->sata_dev.scontrol = resp->scontrol;
|
||||||
dev->sata_dev.ap->sactive = resp->sactive;
|
|
||||||
} else if (stat->stat != SAM_STAT_GOOD) {
|
} else if (stat->stat != SAM_STAT_GOOD) {
|
||||||
ac = sas_to_ata_err(stat);
|
ac = sas_to_ata_err(stat);
|
||||||
if (ac) {
|
if (ac) {
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue