drm/i915: Use mutex_lock_killable() from inside the shrinker
If the current process is being killed (it was interrupted with SIGKILL or equivalent), it will not make any progress in page allocation and we can abort performing the shrinking on its behalf. So we can use mutex_lock_killable() instead (although this path should only be reachable from kswapd currently). Tvrtko pointed out that it should also be reachable from debugfs, which he would prefer retain its interruptiblity. As a compromise, killable is a step in the right direction! Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190109164204.23935-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
This commit is contained in:
parent
7f9e20ef0f
commit
3824e41975
|
@ -39,18 +39,18 @@ static bool shrinker_lock(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
|
|||
unsigned int flags,
|
||||
bool *unlock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
switch (mutex_trylock_recursive(&i915->drm.struct_mutex)) {
|
||||
struct mutex *m = &i915->drm.struct_mutex;
|
||||
|
||||
switch (mutex_trylock_recursive(m)) {
|
||||
case MUTEX_TRYLOCK_RECURSIVE:
|
||||
*unlock = false;
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
case MUTEX_TRYLOCK_FAILED:
|
||||
*unlock = false;
|
||||
if (flags & I915_SHRINK_ACTIVE) {
|
||||
mutex_lock_nested(&i915->drm.struct_mutex,
|
||||
I915_MM_SHRINKER);
|
||||
if (flags & I915_SHRINK_ACTIVE &&
|
||||
mutex_lock_killable_nested(m, I915_MM_SHRINKER) == 0)
|
||||
*unlock = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return *unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
case MUTEX_TRYLOCK_SUCCESS:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue