drm/i915/execlists: Reduce lock contention between schedule/submit_request
If we do not require to perform priority bumping, and we haven't yet submitted the request, we can update its priority in situ and skip acquiring the engine locks -- thus avoiding any contention between us and submit/execute. v2: Remove the stack element from the list if we can do the early assignment. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170517121007.27224-10-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
This commit is contained in:
parent
c5cf9a9147
commit
349bdb68bd
|
@ -779,6 +779,19 @@ static void execlists_schedule(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request, int prio)
|
|||
list_safe_reset_next(dep, p, dfs_link);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* If we didn't need to bump any existing priorities, and we haven't
|
||||
* yet submitted this request (i.e. there is no potential race with
|
||||
* execlists_submit_request()), we can set our own priority and skip
|
||||
* acquiring the engine locks.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (request->priotree.priority == INT_MIN) {
|
||||
GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&request->priotree.link));
|
||||
request->priotree.priority = prio;
|
||||
if (stack.dfs_link.next == stack.dfs_link.prev)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
__list_del_entry(&stack.dfs_link);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
engine = request->engine;
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&engine->timeline->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue