Documentation: checkpatch: Add SYMBOLIC_PERMS message
Add a new message type SYMBOLIC_PERMS under the 'Permissions' subsection. Octal permission bits are easier to read and understand instead of their symbolic macro names. Suggested-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Utkarsh Verma <utkarshverma294@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> Acked-by: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210904082330.14864-1-utkarshverma294@gmail.com [jc: Tweaked wording as suggested by Dwaipayan Ray] Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
29bd0cace2
commit
3454cd5616
|
@ -984,6 +984,17 @@ Permissions
|
|||
Permission bits should use 4 digit octal permissions (like 0700 or 0444).
|
||||
Avoid using any other base like decimal.
|
||||
|
||||
**SYMBOLIC_PERMS**
|
||||
Permission bits in the octal form are more readable and easier to
|
||||
understand than their symbolic counterparts because many command-line
|
||||
tools use this notation. Experienced kernel developers have been using
|
||||
these traditional Unix permission bits for decades and so they find it
|
||||
easier to understand the octal notation than the symbolic macros.
|
||||
For example, it is harder to read S_IWUSR|S_IRUGO than 0644, which
|
||||
obscures the developer's intent rather than clarifying it.
|
||||
|
||||
See: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFw5v23T-zvDZp-MmD_EYxF8WbafwwB59934FV7g21uMGQ@mail.gmail.com/
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Spacing and Brackets
|
||||
--------------------
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue