checkpatch: add optional static const to blank line declarations test
Using a static const struct definition as part of a series of declarations produces a false positive "Missing a blank line after declarations" for code like: WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations #710: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_scale_coefs.c:137: + int inc; + static const struct { So fix it. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5905126e70b0ed1781e49265fd5c49c5090d0223.camel@perches.com Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Reported-by: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com> Cc: "Valkeinen, Tomi" <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9c21dae291
commit
328b5f417a
|
@ -3311,7 +3311,7 @@ sub process {
|
|||
# known declaration macros
|
||||
$sline =~ /^\+\s+$declaration_macros/ ||
|
||||
# start of struct or union or enum
|
||||
$sline =~ /^\+\s+(?:union|struct|enum|typedef)\b/ ||
|
||||
$sline =~ /^\+\s+(?:static\s+)?(?:const\s+)?(?:union|struct|enum|typedef)\b/ ||
|
||||
# start or end of block or continuation of declaration
|
||||
$sline =~ /^\+\s+(?:$|[\{\}\.\#\"\?\:\(\[])/ ||
|
||||
# bitfield continuation
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue