dma-buf: Relax the write-seqlock for reallocating the shared fence list
As the set of shared fences is not being changed during reallocation of the reservation list, we can skip updating the write_seqlock. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190712080314.21018-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
This commit is contained in:
parent
45b2fda3d8
commit
30fe7b07f6
|
@ -157,15 +157,15 @@ int reservation_object_reserve_shared(struct reservation_object *obj,
|
|||
(ksize(new) - offsetof(typeof(*new), shared)) /
|
||||
sizeof(*new->shared);
|
||||
|
||||
preempt_disable();
|
||||
write_seqcount_begin(&obj->seq);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* RCU_INIT_POINTER can be used here,
|
||||
* seqcount provides the necessary barriers
|
||||
* We are not changing the effective set of fences here so can
|
||||
* merely update the pointer to the new array; both existing
|
||||
* readers and new readers will see exactly the same set of
|
||||
* active (unsignaled) shared fences. Individual fences and the
|
||||
* old array are protected by RCU and so will not vanish under
|
||||
* the gaze of the rcu_read_lock() readers.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
RCU_INIT_POINTER(obj->fence, new);
|
||||
write_seqcount_end(&obj->seq);
|
||||
preempt_enable();
|
||||
rcu_assign_pointer(obj->fence, new);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!old)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue