Staging: Correct use of ! and &
Correct priority problem in the use of ! and &. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/) // <smpl> @@ expression E; constant C; @@ - !E & C + !(E & C) // </smpl> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
658ce9d653
commit
2e9ab1e72c
|
@ -1840,11 +1840,9 @@ int rt_ioctl_siwencode(struct net_device *dev,
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
/* Don't complain if only change the mode */
|
/* Don't complain if only change the mode */
|
||||||
if(!erq->flags & IW_ENCODE_MODE)
|
if (!(erq->flags & IW_ENCODE_MODE))
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
return -EINVAL;
|
return -EINVAL;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
done:
|
done:
|
||||||
DBGPRINT(RT_DEBUG_TRACE ,("==>rt_ioctl_siwencode::erq->flags=%x\n",erq->flags));
|
DBGPRINT(RT_DEBUG_TRACE ,("==>rt_ioctl_siwencode::erq->flags=%x\n",erq->flags));
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -1409,8 +1409,7 @@ int iwctl_siwencode(struct net_device *dev,
|
||||||
// Do we want to just set the transmit key index ?
|
// Do we want to just set the transmit key index ?
|
||||||
if ( index < 4 ) {
|
if ( index < 4 ) {
|
||||||
pDevice->byKeyIndex = index;
|
pDevice->byKeyIndex = index;
|
||||||
}
|
} else if (!(wrq->flags & IW_ENCODE_MODE)) {
|
||||||
else if(!wrq->flags & IW_ENCODE_MODE) {
|
|
||||||
rc = -EINVAL;
|
rc = -EINVAL;
|
||||||
return rc;
|
return rc;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue