xfs: always scrub record/key order of interior records
In commitd47fef9342
, we removed the firstrec and firstkey fields of struct xchk_btree because Christoph thought they were unnecessary because we could use the record index in the btree cursor. This is incorrect because bc_ptrs (now bc_levels[].ptr) tracks the cursor position within a specific btree block, not within the entire level. The end result is that scrub no longer detects situations where the rightmost record of a block is identical to the leftmost record of that block's right sibling. Fix this regression by reintroducing record validity booleans so that order checking skips *only* the leftmost record/key in each level. Fixes:d47fef9342
("xfs: don't track firstrec/firstkey separately in xchk_btree") Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c99f99fa3e
commit
2bea8df0a5
|
@ -151,11 +151,12 @@ xchk_btree_rec(
|
|||
|
||||
trace_xchk_btree_rec(bs->sc, cur, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
/* If this isn't the first record, are they in order? */
|
||||
if (cur->bc_levels[0].ptr > 1 &&
|
||||
/* Are all records across all record blocks in order? */
|
||||
if (bs->lastrec_valid &&
|
||||
!cur->bc_ops->recs_inorder(cur, &bs->lastrec, rec))
|
||||
xchk_btree_set_corrupt(bs->sc, cur, 0);
|
||||
memcpy(&bs->lastrec, rec, cur->bc_ops->rec_len);
|
||||
bs->lastrec_valid = true;
|
||||
|
||||
if (cur->bc_nlevels == 1)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
@ -198,11 +199,12 @@ xchk_btree_key(
|
|||
|
||||
trace_xchk_btree_key(bs->sc, cur, level);
|
||||
|
||||
/* If this isn't the first key, are they in order? */
|
||||
if (cur->bc_levels[level].ptr > 1 &&
|
||||
!cur->bc_ops->keys_inorder(cur, &bs->lastkey[level - 1], key))
|
||||
/* Are all low keys across all node blocks in order? */
|
||||
if (bs->lastkey[level - 1].valid &&
|
||||
!cur->bc_ops->keys_inorder(cur, &bs->lastkey[level - 1].key, key))
|
||||
xchk_btree_set_corrupt(bs->sc, cur, level);
|
||||
memcpy(&bs->lastkey[level - 1], key, cur->bc_ops->key_len);
|
||||
memcpy(&bs->lastkey[level - 1].key, key, cur->bc_ops->key_len);
|
||||
bs->lastkey[level - 1].valid = true;
|
||||
|
||||
if (level + 1 >= cur->bc_nlevels)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -31,6 +31,11 @@ typedef int (*xchk_btree_rec_fn)(
|
|||
struct xchk_btree *bs,
|
||||
const union xfs_btree_rec *rec);
|
||||
|
||||
struct xchk_btree_key {
|
||||
union xfs_btree_key key;
|
||||
bool valid;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct xchk_btree {
|
||||
/* caller-provided scrub state */
|
||||
struct xfs_scrub *sc;
|
||||
|
@ -40,11 +45,12 @@ struct xchk_btree {
|
|||
void *private;
|
||||
|
||||
/* internal scrub state */
|
||||
bool lastrec_valid;
|
||||
union xfs_btree_rec lastrec;
|
||||
struct list_head to_check;
|
||||
|
||||
/* this element must come last! */
|
||||
union xfs_btree_key lastkey[];
|
||||
struct xchk_btree_key lastkey[];
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue