blk-mq: don't insert FUA request with data into scheduler queue

We never insert flush request into scheduler queue before.

Recently commit d92ca9d834 ("blk-mq: don't handle non-flush requests in
blk_insert_flush") tries to handle FUA data request as normal request.
This way has caused warning[1] in mq-deadline dd_exit_sched() or io hang in
case of kyber since RQF_ELVPRIV isn't set for flush request, then
->finish_request won't be called.

Fix the issue by inserting FUA data request with blk_mq_request_bypass_insert()
when the device supports FUA, just like what we did before.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/CAHj4cs-_vkTW=dAzbZYGxpEWSpzpcmaNeY1R=vH311+9vMUSdg@mail.gmail.com/

Reported-by: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>
Fixes: d92ca9d834 ("blk-mq: don't handle non-flush requests in blk_insert_flush")
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211118153041.2163228-1-ming.lei@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This commit is contained in:
Ming Lei 2021-11-18 23:30:41 +08:00 committed by Jens Axboe
parent 15c3010496
commit 2b504bd484
3 changed files with 10 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static void mq_flush_data_end_io(struct request *rq, blk_status_t error)
* @rq is being submitted. Analyze what needs to be done and put it on the
* right queue.
*/
bool blk_insert_flush(struct request *rq)
void blk_insert_flush(struct request *rq)
{
struct request_queue *q = rq->q;
unsigned long fflags = q->queue_flags; /* may change, cache */
@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ bool blk_insert_flush(struct request *rq)
*/
if (!policy) {
blk_mq_end_request(rq, 0);
return true;
return;
}
BUG_ON(rq->bio != rq->biotail); /*assumes zero or single bio rq */
@ -420,8 +420,10 @@ bool blk_insert_flush(struct request *rq)
* for normal execution.
*/
if ((policy & REQ_FSEQ_DATA) &&
!(policy & (REQ_FSEQ_PREFLUSH | REQ_FSEQ_POSTFLUSH)))
return false;
!(policy & (REQ_FSEQ_PREFLUSH | REQ_FSEQ_POSTFLUSH))) {
blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, false, true);
return;
}
/*
* @rq should go through flush machinery. Mark it part of flush
@ -437,8 +439,6 @@ bool blk_insert_flush(struct request *rq)
spin_lock_irq(&fq->mq_flush_lock);
blk_flush_complete_seq(rq, fq, REQ_FSEQ_ACTIONS & ~policy, 0);
spin_unlock_irq(&fq->mq_flush_lock);
return true;
}
/**

View File

@ -2647,8 +2647,10 @@ void blk_mq_submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
return;
}
if (op_is_flush(bio->bi_opf) && blk_insert_flush(rq))
if (op_is_flush(bio->bi_opf)) {
blk_insert_flush(rq);
return;
}
if (plug && (q->nr_hw_queues == 1 ||
blk_mq_is_shared_tags(rq->mq_hctx->flags) ||

View File

@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ void __blk_account_io_done(struct request *req, u64 now);
*/
#define ELV_ON_HASH(rq) ((rq)->rq_flags & RQF_HASHED)
bool blk_insert_flush(struct request *rq);
void blk_insert_flush(struct request *rq);
int elevator_switch_mq(struct request_queue *q,
struct elevator_type *new_e);