ufs: more deadlock prevention on tail unpacking
->s_lock is not needed for ufs_change_blocknr() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
09bf4f5b6e
commit
289dec5b89
|
@ -478,6 +478,7 @@ u64 ufs_new_fragments(struct inode *inode, void *p, u64 fragment,
|
|||
if (result) {
|
||||
ufs_clear_frags(inode, result + oldcount, newcount - oldcount,
|
||||
locked_page != NULL);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&UFS_SB(sb)->s_lock);
|
||||
ufs_change_blocknr(inode, fragment - oldcount, oldcount,
|
||||
uspi->s_sbbase + tmp,
|
||||
uspi->s_sbbase + result, locked_page);
|
||||
|
@ -487,7 +488,6 @@ u64 ufs_new_fragments(struct inode *inode, void *p, u64 fragment,
|
|||
UFS_I(inode)->i_lastfrag = max(UFS_I(inode)->i_lastfrag,
|
||||
fragment + count);
|
||||
write_sequnlock(&UFS_I(inode)->meta_lock);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&UFS_SB(sb)->s_lock);
|
||||
if (newcount < request)
|
||||
ufs_free_fragments (inode, result + newcount, request - newcount);
|
||||
ufs_free_fragments (inode, tmp, oldcount);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue