doc: Update synchronize_rcu() definition in whatisRCU.txt
The synchronize_rcu() definition based on RW-locks in whatisRCU.txt does not meet the "Memory-Barrier Guarantees" in Requirements.html; for example, the following SB-like test: P0: P1: WRITE_ONCE(x, 1); WRITE_ONCE(y, 1); synchronize_rcu(); smp_mb(); r0 = READ_ONCE(y); r1 = READ_ONCE(x); should not be allowed to reach the state "r0 = 0 AND r1 = 0", but the current write_lock()+write_unlock() definition can not ensure this. This commit therefore inserts an smp_mb__after_spinlock() in order to cause this synchronize_rcu() implementation to provide this memory-barrier guarantee. Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
67abb96cbf
commit
264d4f88ad
|
@ -588,6 +588,7 @@ It is extremely simple:
|
|||
void synchronize_rcu(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
write_lock(&rcu_gp_mutex);
|
||||
smp_mb__after_spinlock();
|
||||
write_unlock(&rcu_gp_mutex);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -609,12 +610,15 @@ don't forget about them when submitting patches making use of RCU!]
|
|||
|
||||
The rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock() primitive read-acquire
|
||||
and release a global reader-writer lock. The synchronize_rcu()
|
||||
primitive write-acquires this same lock, then immediately releases
|
||||
it. This means that once synchronize_rcu() exits, all RCU read-side
|
||||
critical sections that were in progress before synchronize_rcu() was
|
||||
called are guaranteed to have completed -- there is no way that
|
||||
synchronize_rcu() would have been able to write-acquire the lock
|
||||
otherwise.
|
||||
primitive write-acquires this same lock, then releases it. This means
|
||||
that once synchronize_rcu() exits, all RCU read-side critical sections
|
||||
that were in progress before synchronize_rcu() was called are guaranteed
|
||||
to have completed -- there is no way that synchronize_rcu() would have
|
||||
been able to write-acquire the lock otherwise. The smp_mb__after_spinlock()
|
||||
promotes synchronize_rcu() to a full memory barrier in compliance with
|
||||
the "Memory-Barrier Guarantees" listed in:
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html.
|
||||
|
||||
It is possible to nest rcu_read_lock(), since reader-writer locks may
|
||||
be recursively acquired. Note also that rcu_read_lock() is immune
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue