xen: don't worry about preempt during xen_irq_enable()
When enabling interrupts, we don't need to worry about preemption, because we either enter with interrupts disabled - so no preemption - or the caller is confused and is re-enabling interrupts on some indeterminate processor. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2956a3511c
commit
239d1fc04e
|
@ -235,13 +235,13 @@ static void xen_irq_enable(void)
|
|||
{
|
||||
struct vcpu_info *vcpu;
|
||||
|
||||
/* There's a one instruction preempt window here. We need to
|
||||
make sure we're don't switch CPUs between getting the vcpu
|
||||
pointer and updating the mask. */
|
||||
preempt_disable();
|
||||
/* We don't need to worry about being preempted here, since
|
||||
either a) interrupts are disabled, so no preemption, or b)
|
||||
the caller is confused and is trying to re-enable interrupts
|
||||
on an indeterminate processor. */
|
||||
|
||||
vcpu = x86_read_percpu(xen_vcpu);
|
||||
vcpu->evtchn_upcall_mask = 0;
|
||||
preempt_enable_no_resched();
|
||||
|
||||
/* Doesn't matter if we get preempted here, because any
|
||||
pending event will get dealt with anyway. */
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue