ASoC: ti: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warning (Building: arm): sound/soc/ti/n810.c: In function ‘n810_ext_control’: sound/soc/ti/n810.c:48:10: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] line1l = 1; ~~~~~~~^~~ sound/soc/ti/n810.c:49:2: note: here case N810_JACK_HP: ^~~~ sound/soc/ti/rx51.c: In function ‘rx51_ext_control’: sound/soc/ti/rx51.c:57:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] hs = 1; ~~~^~~ sound/soc/ti/rx51.c:58:2: note: here case RX51_JACK_HP: ^~~~ Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Acked-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190729221534.GA18696@embeddedor Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ebdd7be541
commit
22581e7c51
|
@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ static void n810_ext_control(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm)
|
|||
switch (n810_jack_func) {
|
||||
case N810_JACK_HS:
|
||||
line1l = 1;
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case N810_JACK_HP:
|
||||
hp = 1;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ static void rx51_ext_control(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm)
|
|||
break;
|
||||
case RX51_JACK_HS:
|
||||
hs = 1;
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case RX51_JACK_HP:
|
||||
hp = 1;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue