dt-bindings: memory: tegra124: emc: Replace core regulator with power domain
Power domain fits much better than a voltage regulator in regards to a proper hardware description and from a software perspective as well. Hence replace the core regulator with the power domain. Note that this doesn't affect any existing DTBs because we haven't started to use the regulator yet, and thus, it's okay to change it. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210330230445.26619-4-digetx@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7885db0ce7
commit
21e4e0d114
|
@ -37,9 +37,10 @@ properties:
|
|||
description:
|
||||
phandle of the memory controller node
|
||||
|
||||
core-supply:
|
||||
power-domains:
|
||||
maxItems: 1
|
||||
description:
|
||||
Phandle of voltage regulator of the SoC "core" power domain.
|
||||
Phandle of the SoC "core" power domain.
|
||||
|
||||
operating-points-v2:
|
||||
description:
|
||||
|
@ -370,7 +371,7 @@ examples:
|
|||
|
||||
nvidia,memory-controller = <&mc>;
|
||||
operating-points-v2 = <&dvfs_opp_table>;
|
||||
core-supply = <&vdd_core>;
|
||||
power-domains = <&domain>;
|
||||
|
||||
#interconnect-cells = <0>;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue