drm/i915: Fix the confusing comment about the ioctl limits
It was reported that this comment was confusing, and indeed it is. v2: (one year later!) Add the range for the DRM_I915_* iotcl defines (Daniel) Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This commit is contained in:
parent
908d759b21
commit
21631f10ea
|
@ -171,8 +171,12 @@ typedef struct _drm_i915_sarea {
|
|||
#define I915_BOX_TEXTURE_LOAD 0x8
|
||||
#define I915_BOX_LOST_CONTEXT 0x10
|
||||
|
||||
/* I915 specific ioctls
|
||||
* The device specific ioctl range is 0x40 to 0x79.
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* i915 specific ioctls.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The device specific ioctl range is [DRM_COMMAND_BASE, DRM_COMMAND_END) ie
|
||||
* [0x40, 0xa0) (a0 is excluded). The numbers below are defined as offset
|
||||
* against DRM_COMMAND_BASE and should be between [0x0, 0x60).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define DRM_I915_INIT 0x00
|
||||
#define DRM_I915_FLUSH 0x01
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue