smb: client: fix warning in CIFSFindNext()
This fixes the following warning reported by kernel test robot fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c:4216 CIFSFindNext() warn: missing error code? 'rc' Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202306170124.CtQqzf0I-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara (SUSE) <pc@manguebit.com> Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
032137fe13
commit
215533f888
|
@ -4099,11 +4099,12 @@ int CIFSFindNext(const unsigned int xid, struct cifs_tcon *tcon,
|
|||
TRANSACTION2_FNEXT_REQ *pSMB = NULL;
|
||||
TRANSACTION2_FNEXT_RSP *pSMBr = NULL;
|
||||
T2_FNEXT_RSP_PARMS *parms;
|
||||
char *response_data;
|
||||
int rc = 0;
|
||||
int bytes_returned;
|
||||
unsigned int name_len;
|
||||
unsigned int lnoff;
|
||||
__u16 params, byte_count;
|
||||
char *response_data;
|
||||
int bytes_returned;
|
||||
int rc = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
cifs_dbg(FYI, "In FindNext\n");
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -4148,8 +4149,8 @@ int CIFSFindNext(const unsigned int xid, struct cifs_tcon *tcon,
|
|||
pSMB->ResumeFileName[name_len] = 0;
|
||||
pSMB->ResumeFileName[name_len+1] = 0;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
rc = -EINVAL;
|
||||
goto FNext2_err_exit;
|
||||
cifs_buf_release(pSMB);
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
byte_count = params + 1 /* pad */ ;
|
||||
pSMB->TotalParameterCount = cpu_to_le16(params);
|
||||
|
@ -4160,71 +4161,61 @@ int CIFSFindNext(const unsigned int xid, struct cifs_tcon *tcon,
|
|||
rc = SendReceive(xid, tcon->ses, (struct smb_hdr *) pSMB,
|
||||
(struct smb_hdr *) pSMBr, &bytes_returned, 0);
|
||||
cifs_stats_inc(&tcon->stats.cifs_stats.num_fnext);
|
||||
|
||||
if (rc) {
|
||||
cifs_buf_release(pSMB);
|
||||
if (rc == -EBADF) {
|
||||
psrch_inf->endOfSearch = true;
|
||||
cifs_buf_release(pSMB);
|
||||
rc = 0; /* search probably was closed at end of search*/
|
||||
} else
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
cifs_dbg(FYI, "FindNext returned = %d\n", rc);
|
||||
} else { /* decode response */
|
||||
rc = validate_t2((struct smb_t2_rsp *)pSMBr);
|
||||
|
||||
if (rc == 0) {
|
||||
unsigned int lnoff;
|
||||
|
||||
/* BB fixme add lock for file (srch_info) struct here */
|
||||
if (pSMBr->hdr.Flags2 & SMBFLG2_UNICODE)
|
||||
psrch_inf->unicode = true;
|
||||
else
|
||||
psrch_inf->unicode = false;
|
||||
response_data = (char *) &pSMBr->hdr.Protocol +
|
||||
le16_to_cpu(pSMBr->t2.ParameterOffset);
|
||||
parms = (T2_FNEXT_RSP_PARMS *)response_data;
|
||||
response_data = (char *)&pSMBr->hdr.Protocol +
|
||||
le16_to_cpu(pSMBr->t2.DataOffset);
|
||||
if (psrch_inf->smallBuf)
|
||||
cifs_small_buf_release(
|
||||
psrch_inf->ntwrk_buf_start);
|
||||
else
|
||||
cifs_buf_release(psrch_inf->ntwrk_buf_start);
|
||||
psrch_inf->srch_entries_start = response_data;
|
||||
psrch_inf->ntwrk_buf_start = (char *)pSMB;
|
||||
psrch_inf->smallBuf = false;
|
||||
if (parms->EndofSearch)
|
||||
psrch_inf->endOfSearch = true;
|
||||
else
|
||||
psrch_inf->endOfSearch = false;
|
||||
psrch_inf->entries_in_buffer =
|
||||
le16_to_cpu(parms->SearchCount);
|
||||
psrch_inf->index_of_last_entry +=
|
||||
psrch_inf->entries_in_buffer;
|
||||
lnoff = le16_to_cpu(parms->LastNameOffset);
|
||||
if (CIFSMaxBufSize < lnoff) {
|
||||
cifs_dbg(VFS, "ignoring corrupt resume name\n");
|
||||
psrch_inf->last_entry = NULL;
|
||||
return rc;
|
||||
} else
|
||||
psrch_inf->last_entry =
|
||||
psrch_inf->srch_entries_start + lnoff;
|
||||
|
||||
/* cifs_dbg(FYI, "fnxt2 entries in buf %d index_of_last %d\n",
|
||||
psrch_inf->entries_in_buffer, psrch_inf->index_of_last_entry); */
|
||||
|
||||
/* BB fixme add unlock here */
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return rc;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* BB On error, should we leave previous search buf (and count and
|
||||
last entry fields) intact or free the previous one? */
|
||||
|
||||
/* Note: On -EAGAIN error only caller can retry on handle based calls
|
||||
since file handle passed in no longer valid */
|
||||
FNext2_err_exit:
|
||||
if (rc != 0)
|
||||
/* decode response */
|
||||
rc = validate_t2((struct smb_t2_rsp *)pSMBr);
|
||||
if (rc) {
|
||||
cifs_buf_release(pSMB);
|
||||
return rc;
|
||||
return rc;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* BB fixme add lock for file (srch_info) struct here */
|
||||
psrch_inf->unicode = !!(pSMBr->hdr.Flags2 & SMBFLG2_UNICODE);
|
||||
response_data = (char *)&pSMBr->hdr.Protocol +
|
||||
le16_to_cpu(pSMBr->t2.ParameterOffset);
|
||||
parms = (T2_FNEXT_RSP_PARMS *)response_data;
|
||||
response_data = (char *)&pSMBr->hdr.Protocol +
|
||||
le16_to_cpu(pSMBr->t2.DataOffset);
|
||||
|
||||
if (psrch_inf->smallBuf)
|
||||
cifs_small_buf_release(psrch_inf->ntwrk_buf_start);
|
||||
else
|
||||
cifs_buf_release(psrch_inf->ntwrk_buf_start);
|
||||
|
||||
psrch_inf->srch_entries_start = response_data;
|
||||
psrch_inf->ntwrk_buf_start = (char *)pSMB;
|
||||
psrch_inf->smallBuf = false;
|
||||
psrch_inf->endOfSearch = !!parms->EndofSearch;
|
||||
psrch_inf->entries_in_buffer = le16_to_cpu(parms->SearchCount);
|
||||
psrch_inf->index_of_last_entry += psrch_inf->entries_in_buffer;
|
||||
lnoff = le16_to_cpu(parms->LastNameOffset);
|
||||
if (CIFSMaxBufSize < lnoff) {
|
||||
cifs_dbg(VFS, "ignoring corrupt resume name\n");
|
||||
psrch_inf->last_entry = NULL;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
psrch_inf->last_entry =
|
||||
psrch_inf->srch_entries_start + lnoff;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* BB fixme add unlock here */
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* BB: On error, should we leave previous search buf
|
||||
* (and count and last entry fields) intact or free the previous one?
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Note: On -EAGAIN error only caller can retry on handle based calls
|
||||
* since file handle passed in no longer valid.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue