x86: convert rdtscll() to use __native_read_tsc
Impact: micro-optimization Is there any reason why x86 rdtscll have to use the out of line function instead of inline __native_read_tsc()? native_read_tsc and __native_read_tsc is essentially the same functions. Patch to let x86 rdtscll() to use the inline version of read_tsc. Signed-off-by: Ken Chen <kenchen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5279585ff2
commit
205516c12d
|
@ -181,10 +181,10 @@ static inline int rdmsrl_amd_safe(unsigned msr, unsigned long long *p)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#define rdtscl(low) \
|
||||
((low) = (u32)native_read_tsc())
|
||||
((low) = (u32)__native_read_tsc())
|
||||
|
||||
#define rdtscll(val) \
|
||||
((val) = native_read_tsc())
|
||||
((val) = __native_read_tsc())
|
||||
|
||||
#define rdpmc(counter, low, high) \
|
||||
do { \
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue