workqueue: Use pr_warn instead of pr_warning
Use pr_warn() instead of the remaining pr_warning() calls. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191128004752.35268-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com To: joe@perches.com To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: arnd@arndb.de Cc: sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2f13437b89
commit
1d9a6159bd
|
@ -4374,8 +4374,8 @@ void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
|
|||
for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) {
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
|
||||
if (WARN_ON(pwq_busy(pwq))) {
|
||||
pr_warning("%s: %s has the following busy pwq\n",
|
||||
__func__, wq->name);
|
||||
pr_warn("%s: %s has the following busy pwq\n",
|
||||
__func__, wq->name);
|
||||
show_pwq(pwq);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue