workqueue: Use pr_warn instead of pr_warning

Use pr_warn() instead of the remaining pr_warning() calls.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191128004752.35268-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
To: joe@perches.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Cc: arnd@arndb.de
Cc: sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
Kefeng Wang 2019-11-28 08:47:49 +08:00 committed by Petr Mladek
parent 2f13437b89
commit 1d9a6159bd
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -4374,8 +4374,8 @@ void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) {
spin_lock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
if (WARN_ON(pwq_busy(pwq))) {
pr_warning("%s: %s has the following busy pwq\n",
__func__, wq->name);
pr_warn("%s: %s has the following busy pwq\n",
__func__, wq->name);
show_pwq(pwq);
spin_unlock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);