epoll: fix possible lost wakeup on epoll_ctl() path
This fixes possible lost wakeup introduced by commita218cc4914
. Originally modifications to ep->wq were serialized by ep->wq.lock, but in commita218cc4914
("epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention") a new rw lock was introduced in order to relax fd event path, i.e. callers of ep_poll_callback() function. After the change ep_modify and ep_insert (both are called on epoll_ctl() path) were switched to ep->lock, but ep_poll (epoll_wait) was using ep->wq.lock on wqueue list modification. The bug doesn't lead to any wqueue list corruptions, because wake up path and list modifications were serialized by ep->wq.lock internally, but actual waitqueue_active() check prior wake_up() call can be reordered with modifications of ep ready list, thus wake up can be lost. And yes, can be healed by explicit smp_mb(): list_add_tail(&epi->rdlink, &ep->rdllist); smp_mb(); if (waitqueue_active(&ep->wq)) wake_up(&ep->wp); But let's make it simple, thus current patch replaces ep->wq.lock with the ep->lock for wqueue modifications, thus wake up path always observes activeness of the wqueue correcty. Fixes:a218cc4914
("epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention") Reported-by: Max Neunhoeffer <max@arangodb.com> Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Tested-by: Max Neunhoeffer <max@arangodb.com> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Cc: Christopher Kohlhoff <chris.kohlhoff@clearpool.io> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [5.1+] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200214170211.561524-1-rpenyaev@suse.de References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205933 Bisected-by: Max Neunhoeffer <max@arangodb.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
12e967fd8e
commit
1b53734bd0
|
@ -1854,9 +1854,9 @@ fetch_events:
|
|||
waiter = true;
|
||||
init_waitqueue_entry(&wait, current);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&ep->wq.lock);
|
||||
write_lock_irq(&ep->lock);
|
||||
__add_wait_queue_exclusive(&ep->wq, &wait);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&ep->wq.lock);
|
||||
write_unlock_irq(&ep->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (;;) {
|
||||
|
@ -1904,9 +1904,9 @@ send_events:
|
|||
goto fetch_events;
|
||||
|
||||
if (waiter) {
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&ep->wq.lock);
|
||||
write_lock_irq(&ep->lock);
|
||||
__remove_wait_queue(&ep->wq, &wait);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&ep->wq.lock);
|
||||
write_unlock_irq(&ep->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue