drm/exynos/ipp: remove incorrect checks of list_first_entry result
list_first_entry does not return NULL on empty list so this check does not make sense. Moreover there is already code which prevents calling list_first_entry on empty lists. Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
73b00232ac
commit
187d5edf1e
|
@ -1277,11 +1277,6 @@ static int ipp_start_property(struct exynos_drm_ippdrv *ippdrv,
|
|||
|
||||
m_node = list_first_entry(head,
|
||||
struct drm_exynos_ipp_mem_node, list);
|
||||
if (!m_node) {
|
||||
DRM_ERROR("failed to get node.\n");
|
||||
ret = -EFAULT;
|
||||
goto err_unlock;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("m_node[0x%x]\n", (int)m_node);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1539,11 +1534,6 @@ static int ipp_send_event(struct exynos_drm_ippdrv *ippdrv,
|
|||
|
||||
m_node = list_first_entry(head,
|
||||
struct drm_exynos_ipp_mem_node, list);
|
||||
if (!m_node) {
|
||||
DRM_ERROR("empty memory node.\n");
|
||||
ret = -ENOMEM;
|
||||
goto err_mem_unlock;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
tbuf_id[i] = m_node->buf_id;
|
||||
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s buf_id[%d]\n",
|
||||
|
@ -1580,11 +1570,6 @@ static int ipp_send_event(struct exynos_drm_ippdrv *ippdrv,
|
|||
|
||||
m_node = list_first_entry(head,
|
||||
struct drm_exynos_ipp_mem_node, list);
|
||||
if (!m_node) {
|
||||
DRM_ERROR("empty memory node.\n");
|
||||
ret = -ENOMEM;
|
||||
goto err_mem_unlock;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
tbuf_id[EXYNOS_DRM_OPS_SRC] = m_node->buf_id;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue