drm/i915/kbl: KBL also needs to run the SAGV code
According to BSpec, it's the "core CPUs" that need the code, which
means SKL and KBL, but not BXT.
I don't have a KBL to test this patch on it.
v2: Only SKL should have I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1474578035-424-4-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 6e3100ec21
)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6e7fdb873d
commit
17777d61f4
|
@ -2880,8 +2880,14 @@ skl_wm_plane_id(const struct intel_plane *plane)
|
|||
static bool
|
||||
intel_has_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) &&
|
||||
dev_priv->sagv_status != I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED;
|
||||
if (IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) &&
|
||||
dev_priv->sagv_status != I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -2919,7 +2925,7 @@ intel_enable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
|
|||
* Some skl systems, pre-release machines in particular,
|
||||
* don't actually have an SAGV.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (ret == -ENXIO) {
|
||||
if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && ret == -ENXIO) {
|
||||
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("No SAGV found on system, ignoring\n");
|
||||
dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
@ -2973,7 +2979,7 @@ intel_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
|
|||
* Some skl systems, pre-release machines in particular,
|
||||
* don't actually have an SAGV.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (result == -ENXIO) {
|
||||
if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && result == -ENXIO) {
|
||||
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("No SAGV found on system, ignoring\n");
|
||||
dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue