btrfs: use narrower type for btrfs_transaction::num_dirty_bgs
The u64 is an overkill here, we could not possibly create that many blockgroups in one transaction. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1ca4bb63f6
commit
165c8b022c
|
@ -2894,7 +2894,7 @@ int btrfs_check_space_for_delayed_refs(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
|
|||
struct btrfs_block_rsv *global_rsv;
|
||||
u64 num_heads = trans->transaction->delayed_refs.num_heads_ready;
|
||||
u64 csum_bytes = trans->transaction->delayed_refs.pending_csums;
|
||||
u64 num_dirty_bgs = trans->transaction->num_dirty_bgs;
|
||||
unsigned int num_dirty_bgs = trans->transaction->num_dirty_bgs;
|
||||
u64 num_bytes, num_dirty_bgs_bytes;
|
||||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ struct btrfs_transaction {
|
|||
struct list_head dirty_bgs;
|
||||
struct list_head io_bgs;
|
||||
struct list_head dropped_roots;
|
||||
u64 num_dirty_bgs;
|
||||
unsigned int num_dirty_bgs;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* we need to make sure block group deletion doesn't race with
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue