ACPI: Clarify resource conflict message
The message "ACPI: Device needs an ACPI driver" is misleading. The device _may_ need an ACPI driver, if the BIOS implemented a custom API for the device in question (which, AFAIK, can't be checked.) If not, then either a generic ACPI driver may be used (for example "thermal"), or nothing can be done (other than a white list). I propose to reword the message to: ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available for this device, you should use it instead of the native driver which I think is more correct. Comments and suggestions welcome. I also added a message warning about possible problems and system instability when users pass acpi_enforce_resources=lax, as suggested by Len. Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Cc: Alan Jenkins <sourcejedi.lkml@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b684a3637e
commit
14f03343ad
|
@ -1161,7 +1161,13 @@ int acpi_check_resource_conflict(struct resource *res)
|
|||
res_list_elem->name,
|
||||
(long long) res_list_elem->start,
|
||||
(long long) res_list_elem->end);
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO "ACPI: Device needs an ACPI driver\n");
|
||||
if (acpi_enforce_resources == ENFORCE_RESOURCES_LAX)
|
||||
printk(KERN_NOTICE "ACPI: This conflict may"
|
||||
" cause random problems and system"
|
||||
" instability\n");
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO "ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available"
|
||||
" for this device, you should use it instead of"
|
||||
" the native driver\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (acpi_enforce_resources == ENFORCE_RESOURCES_STRICT)
|
||||
return -EBUSY;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue