drm/i915: Split execlists/guc reset preparations
In the next patch, we will make the execlists reset prepare callback take into account preemption by flushing the context-switch handler. This is not applicable to the GuC submission backend, so split the two into their own backend callbacks. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> CC: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180516183355.10553-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
This commit is contained in:
parent
5adfb772f8
commit
1329115c6c
|
@ -815,6 +815,37 @@ static void guc_submission_tasklet(unsigned long data)
|
|||
guc_dequeue(engine);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct i915_request *
|
||||
guc_reset_prepare(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists = &engine->execlists;
|
||||
|
||||
GEM_TRACE("%s\n", engine->name);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Prevent request submission to the hardware until we have
|
||||
* completed the reset in i915_gem_reset_finish(). If a request
|
||||
* is completed by one engine, it may then queue a request
|
||||
* to a second via its execlists->tasklet *just* as we are
|
||||
* calling engine->init_hw() and also writing the ELSP.
|
||||
* Turning off the execlists->tasklet until the reset is over
|
||||
* prevents the race.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
__tasklet_disable_sync_once(&execlists->tasklet);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We're using worker to queue preemption requests from the tasklet in
|
||||
* GuC submission mode.
|
||||
* Even though tasklet was disabled, we may still have a worker queued.
|
||||
* Let's make sure that all workers scheduled before disabling the
|
||||
* tasklet are completed before continuing with the reset.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (engine->i915->guc.preempt_wq)
|
||||
flush_workqueue(engine->i915->guc.preempt_wq);
|
||||
|
||||
return i915_gem_find_active_request(engine);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Everything below here is concerned with setup & teardown, and is
|
||||
* therefore not part of the somewhat time-critical batch-submission
|
||||
|
@ -1275,6 +1306,9 @@ int intel_guc_submission_enable(struct intel_guc *guc)
|
|||
&engine->execlists;
|
||||
|
||||
execlists->tasklet.func = guc_submission_tasklet;
|
||||
|
||||
engine->reset.prepare = guc_reset_prepare;
|
||||
|
||||
engine->park = guc_submission_park;
|
||||
engine->unpark = guc_submission_unpark;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1845,16 +1845,6 @@ execlists_reset_prepare(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
|
|||
*/
|
||||
__tasklet_disable_sync_once(&execlists->tasklet);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We're using worker to queue preemption requests from the tasklet in
|
||||
* GuC submission mode.
|
||||
* Even though tasklet was disabled, we may still have a worker queued.
|
||||
* Let's make sure that all workers scheduled before disabling the
|
||||
* tasklet are completed before continuing with the reset.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (engine->i915->guc.preempt_wq)
|
||||
flush_workqueue(engine->i915->guc.preempt_wq);
|
||||
|
||||
return i915_gem_find_active_request(engine);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2256,6 +2246,8 @@ static void execlists_set_default_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
|
|||
engine->schedule = execlists_schedule;
|
||||
engine->execlists.tasklet.func = execlists_submission_tasklet;
|
||||
|
||||
engine->reset.prepare = execlists_reset_prepare;
|
||||
|
||||
engine->park = NULL;
|
||||
engine->unpark = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue