list: Expand list_first_entry_or_null()
Due to the use of READ_ONCE() in list_empty() the compiler cannot optimise !list_empty() ? list_first_entry() : NULL very well. By manually expanding list_first_entry_or_null() we can take advantage of the READ_ONCE() to avoid the list element changing under the test while the compiler can generate smaller code. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3563a438f1
commit
12adfd882c
|
@ -381,8 +381,11 @@ static inline void list_splice_tail_init(struct list_head *list,
|
|||
*
|
||||
* Note that if the list is empty, it returns NULL.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define list_first_entry_or_null(ptr, type, member) \
|
||||
(!list_empty(ptr) ? list_first_entry(ptr, type, member) : NULL)
|
||||
#define list_first_entry_or_null(ptr, type, member) ({ \
|
||||
struct list_head *head__ = (ptr); \
|
||||
struct list_head *pos__ = READ_ONCE(head__->next); \
|
||||
pos__ != head__ ? list_entry(pos__, type, member) : NULL; \
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* list_next_entry - get the next element in list
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue