drm/i915: Don't set queue-priority hint when supressing the reschedule
We recorded the execlists->queue_priority_hint update for the inflight request without kicking the tasklet. The next submitted request then failed to be scheduled as it had a lower priority than the hint, leaving the HW running with only the inflight request. Fixes:6cebcf746f
("drm/i915: Tweak scheduler's kick_submission()") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200519063123.20673-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commitb86fc6e5e8
) Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d96536f0fe
commit
0fad590fd9
|
@ -209,14 +209,6 @@ static void kick_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
|
|||
if (!inflight)
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
ENGINE_TRACE(engine,
|
||||
"bumping queue-priority-hint:%d for rq:%llx:%lld, inflight:%llx:%lld prio %d\n",
|
||||
prio,
|
||||
rq->fence.context, rq->fence.seqno,
|
||||
inflight->fence.context, inflight->fence.seqno,
|
||||
inflight->sched.attr.priority);
|
||||
engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint = prio;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we are already the currently executing context, don't
|
||||
* bother evaluating if we should preempt ourselves.
|
||||
|
@ -224,6 +216,14 @@ static void kick_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
|
|||
if (inflight->context == rq->context)
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
ENGINE_TRACE(engine,
|
||||
"bumping queue-priority-hint:%d for rq:%llx:%lld, inflight:%llx:%lld prio %d\n",
|
||||
prio,
|
||||
rq->fence.context, rq->fence.seqno,
|
||||
inflight->fence.context, inflight->fence.seqno,
|
||||
inflight->sched.attr.priority);
|
||||
|
||||
engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint = prio;
|
||||
if (need_preempt(prio, rq_prio(inflight)))
|
||||
tasklet_hi_schedule(&engine->execlists.tasklet);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue