ALSA: pcm: Fix refcount_inc() on zero usage
The recent rewrite of PCM link lock management introduced the refcount
in snd_pcm_group object, managed by the kernel refcount_t API. This
caused unexpected kernel warnings when the kernel is built with
CONFIG_REFCOUNT_FULL=y. As the warning line indicates, the problem is
obviously that we start with refcount=0 and do refcount_inc() for
adding each PCM link, while refcount_t API doesn't like refcount_inc()
performed on zero.
For adapting the proper refcount_t usage, this patch changes the logic
slightly:
- The initial refcount is 1, assuming the single list entry
- The refcount is incremented / decremented at each PCM link addition
and deletion
- ... which allows us concentrating only on the refcount as a release
condition
Fixes: f57f3df03a
("ALSA: pcm: More fine-grained PCM link locking")
BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204221
Reported-and-tested-by: Duncan Overbruck <kernel@duncano.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
70256b42ca
commit
0e279dcea0
|
@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ void snd_pcm_group_init(struct snd_pcm_group *group)
|
|||
spin_lock_init(&group->lock);
|
||||
mutex_init(&group->mutex);
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&group->substreams);
|
||||
refcount_set(&group->refs, 0);
|
||||
refcount_set(&group->refs, 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* define group lock helpers */
|
||||
|
@ -1096,8 +1096,7 @@ static void snd_pcm_group_unref(struct snd_pcm_group *group,
|
|||
|
||||
if (!group)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
do_free = refcount_dec_and_test(&group->refs) &&
|
||||
list_empty(&group->substreams);
|
||||
do_free = refcount_dec_and_test(&group->refs);
|
||||
snd_pcm_group_unlock(group, substream->pcm->nonatomic);
|
||||
if (do_free)
|
||||
kfree(group);
|
||||
|
@ -2020,6 +2019,7 @@ static int snd_pcm_link(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int fd)
|
|||
snd_pcm_group_lock_irq(target_group, nonatomic);
|
||||
snd_pcm_stream_lock(substream1);
|
||||
snd_pcm_group_assign(substream1, target_group);
|
||||
refcount_inc(&target_group->refs);
|
||||
snd_pcm_stream_unlock(substream1);
|
||||
snd_pcm_group_unlock_irq(target_group, nonatomic);
|
||||
_end:
|
||||
|
@ -2056,13 +2056,14 @@ static int snd_pcm_unlink(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
|
|||
snd_pcm_group_lock_irq(group, nonatomic);
|
||||
|
||||
relink_to_local(substream);
|
||||
refcount_dec(&group->refs);
|
||||
|
||||
/* detach the last stream, too */
|
||||
if (list_is_singular(&group->substreams)) {
|
||||
relink_to_local(list_first_entry(&group->substreams,
|
||||
struct snd_pcm_substream,
|
||||
link_list));
|
||||
do_free = !refcount_read(&group->refs);
|
||||
do_free = refcount_dec_and_test(&group->refs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
snd_pcm_group_unlock_irq(group, nonatomic);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue