From 0cdc444a67ccdbd58bfbcba865cb17a9f17a7691 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mel Gorman Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:08:48 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] mm: swap: mark swap pages writeback before queueing for direct IO As pointed out by Andrew Morton, the swap-over-NFS writeback is not setting PageWriteback before it is queued for direct IO. While swap pages do not participate in BDI or process dirty accounting and the IO is synchronous, the writeback bit is still required and not setting it in this case was an oversight. swapoff depends on the page writeback to synchronoise all pending writes on a swap page before it is reused. Swapcache freeing and reuse depend on checking the PageWriteback under lock to ensure the page is safe to reuse. Direct IO handlers and the direct IO handler for NFS do not deal with PageWriteback as they are synchronous writes. In the case of NFS, it schedules pages (or a page in the case of swap) for IO and then waits synchronously for IO to complete in nfs_direct_write(). It is recognised that this is a slowdown from normal swap handling which is asynchronous and uses a completion handler. Shoving PageWriteback handling down into direct IO handlers looks like a bad fit to handle the swap case although it may have to be dealt with some day if swap is converted to use direct IO in general and bmap is finally done away with. At that point it will be necessary to refit asynchronous direct IO with completion handlers onto the swap subsystem. As swapcache currently depends on PageWriteback to protect against races, this patch sets PageWriteback under the page lock before queueing it for direct IO. It is cleared when the direct IO handler returns. IO errors are treated similarly to the direct-to-bio case except PageError is not set as in the case of swap-over-NFS, it is likely to be a transient error. It was asked what prevents such a page being reclaimed in parallel. With this patch applied, such a page will now be skipped (most of the time) or blocked until the writeback completes. Reclaim checks PageWriteback under the page lock before calling try_to_free_swap and the page lock should prevent the page being requeued for IO before it is freed. This and Jerome's related patch should considered for -stable as far back as 3.6 when swap-over-NFS was introduced. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use pr_err_ratelimited()] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove hopefully-unneeded cast in printk] Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman Cc: Jerome Marchand Cc: Hugh Dickins Cc: [3.6+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- mm/page_io.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) diff --git a/mm/page_io.c b/mm/page_io.c index eb3300fa89dc..bb5d75274686 100644 --- a/mm/page_io.c +++ b/mm/page_io.c @@ -223,6 +223,7 @@ int __swap_writepage(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc, kiocb.ki_left = PAGE_SIZE; kiocb.ki_nbytes = PAGE_SIZE; + set_page_writeback(page); unlock_page(page); ret = mapping->a_ops->direct_IO(KERNEL_WRITE, &kiocb, &iov, @@ -232,8 +233,22 @@ int __swap_writepage(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc, count_vm_event(PSWPOUT); ret = 0; } else { + /* + * In the case of swap-over-nfs, this can be a + * temporary failure if the system has limited + * memory for allocating transmit buffers. + * Mark the page dirty and avoid + * rotate_reclaimable_page but rate-limit the + * messages but do not flag PageError like + * the normal direct-to-bio case as it could + * be temporary. + */ set_page_dirty(page); + ClearPageReclaim(page); + pr_err_ratelimited("Write error on dio swapfile (%Lu)\n", + page_file_offset(page)); } + end_page_writeback(page); return ret; }