net: qcom/emac: Replace strlcpy with strscpy

The strlcpy should not be used because it doesn't limit the source
length. As linus says, it's a completely useless function if you
can't implicitly trust the source string - but that is almost always
why people think they should use it! All in all the BSD function
will lead some potential bugs.

But the strscpy doesn't require reading memory from the src string
beyond the specified "count" bytes, and since the return value is
easier to error-check than strlcpy()'s. In addition, the implementation
is robust to the string changing out from underneath it, unlike the
current strlcpy() implementation.

Thus, We prefer using strscpy instead of strlcpy.

Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <wangborong@cdjrlc.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Jason Wang 2021-09-06 21:56:53 +08:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent fe63339ef3
commit 0a83299935
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static void emac_get_strings(struct net_device *netdev, u32 stringset, u8 *data)
case ETH_SS_STATS:
for (i = 0; i < EMAC_STATS_LEN; i++) {
strlcpy(data, emac_ethtool_stat_strings[i],
strscpy(data, emac_ethtool_stat_strings[i],
ETH_GSTRING_LEN);
data += ETH_GSTRING_LEN;
}