bpf: Introduce internal definitions for UAPI-opaque bpf_{rb,list}_node
Structs bpf_rb_node and bpf_list_node are opaquely defined in uapi/linux/bpf.h, as BPF program writers are not expected to touch their fields - nor does the verifier allow them to do so. Currently these structs are simple wrappers around structs rb_node and list_head and linked_list / rbtree implementation just casts and passes to library functions for those data structures. Later patches in this series, though, will add an "owner" field to bpf_{rb,list}_node, such that they're not just wrapping an underlying node type. Moreover, the bpf linked_list and rbtree implementations will deal with these owner pointers directly in a few different places. To avoid having to do void *owner = (void*)bpf_list_node + sizeof(struct list_head) with opaque UAPI node types, add bpf_{list,rb}_node_kern struct definitions to internal headers and modify linked_list and rbtree to use the internal types where appropriate. Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230718083813.3416104-3-davemarchevsky@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
60cc1f7d06
commit
0a1f7bfe35
|
@ -228,6 +228,16 @@ struct btf_record {
|
|||
struct btf_field fields[];
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/* Non-opaque version of bpf_rb_node in uapi/linux/bpf.h */
|
||||
struct bpf_rb_node_kern {
|
||||
struct rb_node rb_node;
|
||||
} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
|
||||
|
||||
/* Non-opaque version of bpf_list_node in uapi/linux/bpf.h */
|
||||
struct bpf_list_node_kern {
|
||||
struct list_head list_head;
|
||||
} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
|
||||
|
||||
struct bpf_map {
|
||||
/* The first two cachelines with read-mostly members of which some
|
||||
* are also accessed in fast-path (e.g. ops, max_entries).
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1942,10 +1942,11 @@ __bpf_kfunc void *bpf_refcount_acquire_impl(void *p__refcounted_kptr, void *meta
|
|||
return (void *)p__refcounted_kptr;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int __bpf_list_add(struct bpf_list_node *node, struct bpf_list_head *head,
|
||||
static int __bpf_list_add(struct bpf_list_node_kern *node,
|
||||
struct bpf_list_head *head,
|
||||
bool tail, struct btf_record *rec, u64 off)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct list_head *n = (void *)node, *h = (void *)head;
|
||||
struct list_head *n = &node->list_head, *h = (void *)head;
|
||||
|
||||
/* If list_head was 0-initialized by map, bpf_obj_init_field wasn't
|
||||
* called on its fields, so init here
|
||||
|
@ -1967,20 +1968,20 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_list_push_front_impl(struct bpf_list_head *head,
|
|||
struct bpf_list_node *node,
|
||||
void *meta__ign, u64 off)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct bpf_list_node_kern *n = (void *)node;
|
||||
struct btf_struct_meta *meta = meta__ign;
|
||||
|
||||
return __bpf_list_add(node, head, false,
|
||||
meta ? meta->record : NULL, off);
|
||||
return __bpf_list_add(n, head, false, meta ? meta->record : NULL, off);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
__bpf_kfunc int bpf_list_push_back_impl(struct bpf_list_head *head,
|
||||
struct bpf_list_node *node,
|
||||
void *meta__ign, u64 off)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct bpf_list_node_kern *n = (void *)node;
|
||||
struct btf_struct_meta *meta = meta__ign;
|
||||
|
||||
return __bpf_list_add(node, head, true,
|
||||
meta ? meta->record : NULL, off);
|
||||
return __bpf_list_add(n, head, true, meta ? meta->record : NULL, off);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct bpf_list_node *__bpf_list_del(struct bpf_list_head *head, bool tail)
|
||||
|
@ -2013,7 +2014,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc struct bpf_rb_node *bpf_rbtree_remove(struct bpf_rb_root *root,
|
|||
struct bpf_rb_node *node)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct rb_root_cached *r = (struct rb_root_cached *)root;
|
||||
struct rb_node *n = (struct rb_node *)node;
|
||||
struct rb_node *n = &((struct bpf_rb_node_kern *)node)->rb_node;
|
||||
|
||||
if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(n))
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
@ -2026,11 +2027,12 @@ __bpf_kfunc struct bpf_rb_node *bpf_rbtree_remove(struct bpf_rb_root *root,
|
|||
/* Need to copy rbtree_add_cached's logic here because our 'less' is a BPF
|
||||
* program
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int __bpf_rbtree_add(struct bpf_rb_root *root, struct bpf_rb_node *node,
|
||||
static int __bpf_rbtree_add(struct bpf_rb_root *root,
|
||||
struct bpf_rb_node_kern *node,
|
||||
void *less, struct btf_record *rec, u64 off)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct rb_node **link = &((struct rb_root_cached *)root)->rb_root.rb_node;
|
||||
struct rb_node *parent = NULL, *n = (struct rb_node *)node;
|
||||
struct rb_node *parent = NULL, *n = &node->rb_node;
|
||||
bpf_callback_t cb = (bpf_callback_t)less;
|
||||
bool leftmost = true;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2060,8 +2062,9 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_rbtree_add_impl(struct bpf_rb_root *root, struct bpf_rb_node
|
|||
void *meta__ign, u64 off)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct btf_struct_meta *meta = meta__ign;
|
||||
struct bpf_rb_node_kern *n = (void *)node;
|
||||
|
||||
return __bpf_rbtree_add(root, node, (void *)less, meta ? meta->record : NULL, off);
|
||||
return __bpf_rbtree_add(root, n, (void *)less, meta ? meta->record : NULL, off);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
__bpf_kfunc struct bpf_rb_node *bpf_rbtree_first(struct bpf_rb_root *root)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue