coresight: etm4x: use module_param instead of module_param_named
Given that the user-exposed module parameter for 'boot_enable' matches the variable that it sets, let's use module_param instead of module_param_named. Let's also use octal permissions (checkpatch recommends this) and provide a module parameter description. Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829202842.580-12-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1004ce4c25
commit
08d2ddaa58
|
@ -34,7 +34,8 @@
|
||||||
#include "coresight-etm-perf.h"
|
#include "coresight-etm-perf.h"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static int boot_enable;
|
static int boot_enable;
|
||||||
module_param_named(boot_enable, boot_enable, int, S_IRUGO);
|
module_param(boot_enable, int, 0444);
|
||||||
|
MODULE_PARM_DESC(boot_enable, "Enable tracing on boot");
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* The number of ETMv4 currently registered */
|
/* The number of ETMv4 currently registered */
|
||||||
static int etm4_count;
|
static int etm4_count;
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue