bpf: Consider non-owning refs to refcounted nodes RCU protected
An earlier patch in the series ensures that the underlying memory of nodes with bpf_refcount - which can have multiple owners - is not reused until RCU grace period has elapsed. This prevents use-after-free with non-owning references that may point to recently-freed memory. While RCU read lock is held, it's safe to dereference such a non-owning ref, as by definition RCU GP couldn't have elapsed and therefore underlying memory couldn't have been reused. From the perspective of verifier "trustedness" non-owning refs to refcounted nodes are now trusted only in RCU CS and therefore should no longer pass is_trusted_reg, but rather is_rcu_reg. Let's mark them MEM_RCU in order to reflect this new state. Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230821193311.3290257-6-davemarchevsky@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ba2464c86f
commit
0816b8c6bf
|
@ -653,7 +653,8 @@ enum bpf_type_flag {
|
|||
MEM_RCU = BIT(13 + BPF_BASE_TYPE_BITS),
|
||||
|
||||
/* Used to tag PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC references which are non-owning.
|
||||
* Currently only valid for linked-list and rbtree nodes.
|
||||
* Currently only valid for linked-list and rbtree nodes. If the nodes
|
||||
* have a bpf_refcount_field, they must be tagged MEM_RCU as well.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
NON_OWN_REF = BIT(14 + BPF_BASE_TYPE_BITS),
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -8007,6 +8007,7 @@ int check_func_arg_reg_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
|
|||
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_TRUSTED:
|
||||
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_RCU:
|
||||
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | NON_OWN_REF:
|
||||
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | NON_OWN_REF | MEM_RCU:
|
||||
/* When referenced PTR_TO_BTF_ID is passed to release function,
|
||||
* its fixed offset must be 0. In the other cases, fixed offset
|
||||
* can be non-zero. This was already checked above. So pass
|
||||
|
@ -10473,6 +10474,7 @@ static int process_kf_arg_ptr_to_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
|
|||
static int ref_set_non_owning(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state;
|
||||
struct btf_record *rec = reg_btf_record(reg);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!state->active_lock.ptr) {
|
||||
verbose(env, "verifier internal error: ref_set_non_owning w/o active lock\n");
|
||||
|
@ -10485,6 +10487,9 @@ static int ref_set_non_owning(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
reg->type |= NON_OWN_REF;
|
||||
if (rec->refcount_off >= 0)
|
||||
reg->type |= MEM_RCU;
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -11322,6 +11327,11 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
|
|||
struct bpf_func_state *state;
|
||||
struct bpf_reg_state *reg;
|
||||
|
||||
if (in_rbtree_lock_required_cb(env) && (rcu_lock || rcu_unlock)) {
|
||||
verbose(env, "Calling bpf_rcu_read_{lock,unlock} in unnecessary rbtree callback\n");
|
||||
return -EACCES;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (rcu_lock) {
|
||||
verbose(env, "nested rcu read lock (kernel function %s)\n", func_name);
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
@ -16684,7 +16694,8 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
|
|||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (env->cur_state->active_rcu_lock) {
|
||||
if (env->cur_state->active_rcu_lock &&
|
||||
!in_rbtree_lock_required_cb(env)) {
|
||||
verbose(env, "bpf_rcu_read_unlock is missing\n");
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue