x86: KVM: svm: don't pretend to advance RIP in case wrmsr_interception() results in #GP
svm->next_rip is only used by skip_emulated_instruction() and in case kvm_set_msr() fails we rightfully don't do that. Move svm->next_rip advancement to 'else' branch to avoid creating false impression that it's always advanced (and make it look like rdmsr_interception()). This is a preparatory change to removing hardcoded RIP advancement from instruction intercepts, no functional change. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
016cd75964
commit
05402f6454
|
@ -4444,13 +4444,13 @@ static int wrmsr_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
|
|||
msr.index = ecx;
|
||||
msr.host_initiated = false;
|
||||
|
||||
svm->next_rip = kvm_rip_read(&svm->vcpu) + 2;
|
||||
if (kvm_set_msr(&svm->vcpu, &msr)) {
|
||||
trace_kvm_msr_write_ex(ecx, data);
|
||||
kvm_inject_gp(&svm->vcpu, 0);
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
trace_kvm_msr_write(ecx, data);
|
||||
svm->next_rip = kvm_rip_read(&svm->vcpu) + 2;
|
||||
return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(&svm->vcpu);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue