drm: Core vsync: Don't clobber target sequence number when scheduling signal.
It looks like this would have caused signals to always get sent on the next vertical blank, regardless of the sequence number. Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ab285d74e6
commit
049b323321
|
@ -296,8 +296,6 @@ int drm_wait_vblank(DRM_IOCTL_ARGS)
|
|||
? &dev->vbl_sigs2 : &dev->vbl_sigs;
|
||||
drm_vbl_sig_t *vbl_sig;
|
||||
|
||||
vblwait.reply.sequence = seq;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Check if this task has already scheduled the same signal
|
||||
|
@ -310,6 +308,7 @@ int drm_wait_vblank(DRM_IOCTL_ARGS)
|
|||
&& vbl_sig->task == current) {
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->vbl_lock,
|
||||
irqflags);
|
||||
vblwait.reply.sequence = seq;
|
||||
goto done;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -340,6 +339,8 @@ int drm_wait_vblank(DRM_IOCTL_ARGS)
|
|||
list_add_tail((struct list_head *)vbl_sig, &vbl_sigs->head);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags);
|
||||
|
||||
vblwait.reply.sequence = seq;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (flags & _DRM_VBLANK_SECONDARY) {
|
||||
if (dev->driver->vblank_wait2)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue