MIPS: perf events: handle switch statement falling through warnings
Now that we build with -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3, some warnings are produced in the arch/mips perf events code that are promoted to errors: arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c:792:3: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=] arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c:795:3: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=] arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c:798:3: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=] arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c:1407:6: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=] Assume the fall throughs are deliberate amd annotate/eliminate them. Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> [paul.burton@mips.com: - Make n signed to fix the loop condition. - Simplify the initialization of n, which should never have a value greater than 4. - Invert conditions in the loop to decrease indentation.] Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c9093486f2
commit
03bcba73cb
|
@ -793,15 +793,19 @@ static void reset_counters(void *arg)
|
|||
case 4:
|
||||
mipsxx_pmu_write_control(3, 0);
|
||||
mipspmu.write_counter(3, 0);
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case 3:
|
||||
mipsxx_pmu_write_control(2, 0);
|
||||
mipspmu.write_counter(2, 0);
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case 2:
|
||||
mipsxx_pmu_write_control(1, 0);
|
||||
mipspmu.write_counter(1, 0);
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case 1:
|
||||
mipsxx_pmu_write_control(0, 0);
|
||||
mipspmu.write_counter(0, 0);
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1383,7 +1387,7 @@ static int mipsxx_pmu_handle_shared_irq(void)
|
|||
struct perf_sample_data data;
|
||||
unsigned int counters = mipspmu.num_counters;
|
||||
u64 counter;
|
||||
int handled = IRQ_NONE;
|
||||
int n, handled = IRQ_NONE;
|
||||
struct pt_regs *regs;
|
||||
|
||||
if (cpu_has_perf_cntr_intr_bit && !(read_c0_cause() & CAUSEF_PCI))
|
||||
|
@ -1404,20 +1408,16 @@ static int mipsxx_pmu_handle_shared_irq(void)
|
|||
|
||||
perf_sample_data_init(&data, 0, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
switch (counters) {
|
||||
#define HANDLE_COUNTER(n) \
|
||||
case n + 1: \
|
||||
if (test_bit(n, cpuc->used_mask)) { \
|
||||
counter = mipspmu.read_counter(n); \
|
||||
if (counter & mipspmu.overflow) { \
|
||||
handle_associated_event(cpuc, n, &data, regs); \
|
||||
handled = IRQ_HANDLED; \
|
||||
} \
|
||||
}
|
||||
HANDLE_COUNTER(3)
|
||||
HANDLE_COUNTER(2)
|
||||
HANDLE_COUNTER(1)
|
||||
HANDLE_COUNTER(0)
|
||||
for (n = counters - 1; n >= 0; n--) {
|
||||
if (!test_bit(n, cpuc->used_mask))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
counter = mipspmu.read_counter(n);
|
||||
if (!(counter & mipspmu.overflow))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
handle_associated_event(cpuc, n, &data, regs);
|
||||
handled = IRQ_HANDLED;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_MIPS_PERF_SHARED_TC_COUNTERS
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue