[GFS2] Fix printk format warnings in DLM code
fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/thread.c: In function ‘process_complete’: fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/thread.c:56: warning: format ‘%llx’ expects type ‘long long unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘uint64_t’ fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/thread.c:69: warning: format ‘%llx’ expects type ‘long long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/thread.c:102: warning: format ‘%llx’ expects type ‘long long unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘uint64_t’ fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/thread.c:124: warning: format ‘%llx’ expects type ‘long long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/thread.c:146: warning: format ‘%llx’ expects type ‘long long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/thread.c:148: warning: format ‘%llx’ expects type ‘long long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
695165dfba
commit
0239c4ae8a
|
@ -54,7 +54,8 @@ static void process_complete(struct gdlm_lock *lp)
|
|||
|
||||
if (lp->lksb.sb_status == -DLM_ECANCEL) {
|
||||
log_info("complete dlm cancel %x,%llx flags %lx",
|
||||
lp->lockname.ln_type, lp->lockname.ln_number,
|
||||
lp->lockname.ln_type,
|
||||
(unsigned long long)lp->lockname.ln_number,
|
||||
lp->flags);
|
||||
|
||||
lp->req = lp->cur;
|
||||
|
@ -68,7 +69,8 @@ static void process_complete(struct gdlm_lock *lp)
|
|||
if (lp->lksb.sb_status != -DLM_EUNLOCK) {
|
||||
log_info("unlock sb_status %d %x,%llx flags %lx",
|
||||
lp->lksb.sb_status, lp->lockname.ln_type,
|
||||
lp->lockname.ln_number, lp->flags);
|
||||
(unsigned long long)lp->lockname.ln_number,
|
||||
lp->flags);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -100,7 +102,8 @@ static void process_complete(struct gdlm_lock *lp)
|
|||
|
||||
if (test_and_clear_bit(LFL_CANCEL, &lp->flags)) {
|
||||
log_info("complete internal cancel %x,%llx",
|
||||
lp->lockname.ln_type, lp->lockname.ln_number);
|
||||
lp->lockname.ln_type,
|
||||
(unsigned long long)lp->lockname.ln_number);
|
||||
lp->req = lp->cur;
|
||||
acb.lc_ret |= LM_OUT_CANCELED;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
@ -123,7 +126,8 @@ static void process_complete(struct gdlm_lock *lp)
|
|||
/* this could only happen with cancels I think */
|
||||
log_info("ast sb_status %d %x,%llx flags %lx",
|
||||
lp->lksb.sb_status, lp->lockname.ln_type,
|
||||
lp->lockname.ln_number, lp->flags);
|
||||
(unsigned long long)lp->lockname.ln_number,
|
||||
lp->flags);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -144,9 +148,11 @@ static void process_complete(struct gdlm_lock *lp)
|
|||
|
||||
if (test_and_clear_bit(LFL_REREQUEST, &lp->flags)) {
|
||||
gdlm_assert(lp->req == DLM_LOCK_NL, "%x,%llx",
|
||||
lp->lockname.ln_type, lp->lockname.ln_number);
|
||||
lp->lockname.ln_type,
|
||||
(unsigned long long)lp->lockname.ln_number);
|
||||
gdlm_assert(lp->prev_req > DLM_LOCK_NL, "%x,%llx",
|
||||
lp->lockname.ln_type, lp->lockname.ln_number);
|
||||
lp->lockname.ln_type,
|
||||
(unsigned long long)lp->lockname.ln_number);
|
||||
|
||||
lp->cur = DLM_LOCK_NL;
|
||||
lp->req = lp->prev_req;
|
||||
|
@ -183,7 +189,8 @@ static void process_complete(struct gdlm_lock *lp)
|
|||
lp->lkf &= ~DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK;
|
||||
|
||||
log_debug("rereq %x,%llx id %x %d,%d",
|
||||
lp->lockname.ln_type, lp->lockname.ln_number,
|
||||
lp->lockname.ln_type,
|
||||
(unsigned long long)lp->lockname.ln_number,
|
||||
lp->lksb.sb_lkid, lp->cur, lp->req);
|
||||
|
||||
set_bit(LFL_REREQUEST, &lp->flags);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue