vfs: add explanation of I_DIRTY_DATASYNC bit
Add explanation of I_DIRTY_DATASYNC bit. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0778361837
commit
000cb48ee1
|
@ -1284,8 +1284,10 @@ struct super_operations {
|
|||
*
|
||||
* I_DIRTY_SYNC Inode is dirty, but doesn't have to be written on
|
||||
* fdatasync(). i_atime is the usual cause.
|
||||
* I_DIRTY_DATASYNC Inode is dirty and must be written on fdatasync(), f.e.
|
||||
* because i_size changed.
|
||||
* I_DIRTY_DATASYNC Data-related inode changes pending. We keep track of
|
||||
* these changes separately from I_DIRTY_SYNC so that we
|
||||
* don't have to write inode on fdatasync() when only
|
||||
* mtime has changed in it.
|
||||
* I_DIRTY_PAGES Inode has dirty pages. Inode itself may be clean.
|
||||
* I_NEW get_new_inode() sets i_state to I_LOCK|I_NEW. Both
|
||||
* are cleared by unlock_new_inode(), called from iget().
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue