OpenCloudOS-Kernel/drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgtty.c

557 lines
12 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/*
* xhci-dbgtty.c - tty glue for xHCI debug capability
*
* Copyright (C) 2017 Intel Corporation
*
* Author: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
*/
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/tty.h>
#include <linux/tty_flip.h>
#include "xhci.h"
#include "xhci-dbgcap.h"
static int dbc_tty_init(void);
static void dbc_tty_exit(void);
static struct tty_driver *dbc_tty_driver;
static inline struct dbc_port *dbc_to_port(struct xhci_dbc *dbc)
{
return dbc->priv;
}
static unsigned int
dbc_send_packet(struct dbc_port *port, char *packet, unsigned int size)
{
unsigned int len;
len = kfifo_len(&port->write_fifo);
if (len < size)
size = len;
if (size != 0)
size = kfifo_out(&port->write_fifo, packet, size);
return size;
}
static int dbc_start_tx(struct dbc_port *port)
__releases(&port->port_lock)
__acquires(&port->port_lock)
{
int len;
struct dbc_request *req;
int status = 0;
bool do_tty_wake = false;
struct list_head *pool = &port->write_pool;
while (!list_empty(pool)) {
req = list_entry(pool->next, struct dbc_request, list_pool);
len = dbc_send_packet(port, req->buf, DBC_MAX_PACKET);
if (len == 0)
break;
do_tty_wake = true;
req->length = len;
list_del(&req->list_pool);
spin_unlock(&port->port_lock);
status = dbc_ep_queue(req);
spin_lock(&port->port_lock);
if (status) {
list_add(&req->list_pool, pool);
break;
}
}
if (do_tty_wake && port->port.tty)
tty_wakeup(port->port.tty);
return status;
}
static void dbc_start_rx(struct dbc_port *port)
__releases(&port->port_lock)
__acquires(&port->port_lock)
{
struct dbc_request *req;
int status;
struct list_head *pool = &port->read_pool;
while (!list_empty(pool)) {
if (!port->port.tty)
break;
req = list_entry(pool->next, struct dbc_request, list_pool);
list_del(&req->list_pool);
req->length = DBC_MAX_PACKET;
spin_unlock(&port->port_lock);
status = dbc_ep_queue(req);
spin_lock(&port->port_lock);
if (status) {
list_add(&req->list_pool, pool);
break;
}
}
}
static void
dbc_read_complete(struct xhci_dbc *dbc, struct dbc_request *req)
{
usb: xhci: dbc: Fix lockdep warning The xHCI DbC implementation might enter a deadlock situation because there is no sufficient protection against the shared data between process and softirq contexts. This can lead to the following lockdep warnings. This patch changes to use spin_{,un}lock_irq{save,restore} to avoid potential deadlock. [ 528.248084] ================================ [ 528.252914] WARNING: inconsistent lock state [ 528.257756] 4.15.0-rc1+ #1630 Not tainted [ 528.262305] -------------------------------- [ 528.267145] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage. [ 528.273953] ksoftirqd/1/17 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE0:SE0] takes: [ 528.280075] (&(&port->port_lock)->rlock){+.?.}, at: [<ffffffff815396a8>] dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.290043] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: [ 528.295570] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 528.299818] dbc_write_complete+0x27/0xa0 [ 528.304458] xhci_dbc_giveback+0xd1/0x200 [ 528.309098] xhci_dbc_flush_endpoint_requests+0x50/0x70 [ 528.315116] xhci_dbc_handle_events+0x696/0x7b0 [ 528.320349] process_one_work+0x1ee/0x6e0 [ 528.324988] worker_thread+0x4a/0x430 [ 528.329236] kthread+0x13e/0x170 [ 528.332992] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 [ 528.337141] irq event stamp: 2861 [ 528.340897] hardirqs last enabled at (2860): [<ffffffff810674ea>] tasklet_action+0x6a/0x250 [ 528.350460] hardirqs last disabled at (2861): [<ffffffff817dc1ef>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xf/0x40 [ 528.360219] softirqs last enabled at (2852): [<ffffffff817e0e8c>] __do_softirq+0x3dc/0x4f9 [ 528.369683] softirqs last disabled at (2857): [<ffffffff8106805b>] run_ksoftirqd+0x1b/0x60 [ 528.379048] [ 528.379048] other info that might help us debug this: [ 528.386443] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 528.386443] [ 528.393150] CPU0 [ 528.395917] ---- [ 528.398687] lock(&(&port->port_lock)->rlock); [ 528.403821] <Interrupt> [ 528.406786] lock(&(&port->port_lock)->rlock); [ 528.412116] [ 528.412116] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 528.412116] [ 528.418825] no locks held by ksoftirqd/1/17. [ 528.423662] [ 528.423662] stack backtrace: [ 528.428598] CPU: 1 PID: 17 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc1+ #1630 [ 528.436387] Call Trace: [ 528.439158] dump_stack+0x5e/0x8e [ 528.442914] print_usage_bug+0x1fc/0x220 [ 528.447357] mark_lock+0x4db/0x5a0 [ 528.451210] __lock_acquire+0x726/0x1130 [ 528.455655] ? __lock_acquire+0x557/0x1130 [ 528.460296] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x200 [ 528.464347] ? dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.468496] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x35/0x40 [ 528.473038] ? dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.477186] dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.481139] tasklet_action+0x1d2/0x250 [ 528.485483] __do_softirq+0x1dc/0x4f9 [ 528.489630] run_ksoftirqd+0x1b/0x60 [ 528.493682] smpboot_thread_fn+0x179/0x270 [ 528.498324] kthread+0x13e/0x170 [ 528.501981] ? sort_range+0x20/0x20 [ 528.505933] ? kthread_delayed_work_timer_fn+0x80/0x80 [ 528.511755] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 Fixes: dfba2174dc42 ("usb: xhci: Add DbC support in xHCI driver") Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-03-08 23:17:15 +08:00
unsigned long flags;
struct dbc_port *port = dbc_to_port(dbc);
usb: xhci: dbc: Fix lockdep warning The xHCI DbC implementation might enter a deadlock situation because there is no sufficient protection against the shared data between process and softirq contexts. This can lead to the following lockdep warnings. This patch changes to use spin_{,un}lock_irq{save,restore} to avoid potential deadlock. [ 528.248084] ================================ [ 528.252914] WARNING: inconsistent lock state [ 528.257756] 4.15.0-rc1+ #1630 Not tainted [ 528.262305] -------------------------------- [ 528.267145] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage. [ 528.273953] ksoftirqd/1/17 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE0:SE0] takes: [ 528.280075] (&(&port->port_lock)->rlock){+.?.}, at: [<ffffffff815396a8>] dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.290043] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: [ 528.295570] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 528.299818] dbc_write_complete+0x27/0xa0 [ 528.304458] xhci_dbc_giveback+0xd1/0x200 [ 528.309098] xhci_dbc_flush_endpoint_requests+0x50/0x70 [ 528.315116] xhci_dbc_handle_events+0x696/0x7b0 [ 528.320349] process_one_work+0x1ee/0x6e0 [ 528.324988] worker_thread+0x4a/0x430 [ 528.329236] kthread+0x13e/0x170 [ 528.332992] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 [ 528.337141] irq event stamp: 2861 [ 528.340897] hardirqs last enabled at (2860): [<ffffffff810674ea>] tasklet_action+0x6a/0x250 [ 528.350460] hardirqs last disabled at (2861): [<ffffffff817dc1ef>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xf/0x40 [ 528.360219] softirqs last enabled at (2852): [<ffffffff817e0e8c>] __do_softirq+0x3dc/0x4f9 [ 528.369683] softirqs last disabled at (2857): [<ffffffff8106805b>] run_ksoftirqd+0x1b/0x60 [ 528.379048] [ 528.379048] other info that might help us debug this: [ 528.386443] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 528.386443] [ 528.393150] CPU0 [ 528.395917] ---- [ 528.398687] lock(&(&port->port_lock)->rlock); [ 528.403821] <Interrupt> [ 528.406786] lock(&(&port->port_lock)->rlock); [ 528.412116] [ 528.412116] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 528.412116] [ 528.418825] no locks held by ksoftirqd/1/17. [ 528.423662] [ 528.423662] stack backtrace: [ 528.428598] CPU: 1 PID: 17 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc1+ #1630 [ 528.436387] Call Trace: [ 528.439158] dump_stack+0x5e/0x8e [ 528.442914] print_usage_bug+0x1fc/0x220 [ 528.447357] mark_lock+0x4db/0x5a0 [ 528.451210] __lock_acquire+0x726/0x1130 [ 528.455655] ? __lock_acquire+0x557/0x1130 [ 528.460296] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x200 [ 528.464347] ? dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.468496] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x35/0x40 [ 528.473038] ? dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.477186] dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.481139] tasklet_action+0x1d2/0x250 [ 528.485483] __do_softirq+0x1dc/0x4f9 [ 528.489630] run_ksoftirqd+0x1b/0x60 [ 528.493682] smpboot_thread_fn+0x179/0x270 [ 528.498324] kthread+0x13e/0x170 [ 528.501981] ? sort_range+0x20/0x20 [ 528.505933] ? kthread_delayed_work_timer_fn+0x80/0x80 [ 528.511755] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 Fixes: dfba2174dc42 ("usb: xhci: Add DbC support in xHCI driver") Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-03-08 23:17:15 +08:00
spin_lock_irqsave(&port->port_lock, flags);
list_add_tail(&req->list_pool, &port->read_queue);
tasklet_schedule(&port->push);
usb: xhci: dbc: Fix lockdep warning The xHCI DbC implementation might enter a deadlock situation because there is no sufficient protection against the shared data between process and softirq contexts. This can lead to the following lockdep warnings. This patch changes to use spin_{,un}lock_irq{save,restore} to avoid potential deadlock. [ 528.248084] ================================ [ 528.252914] WARNING: inconsistent lock state [ 528.257756] 4.15.0-rc1+ #1630 Not tainted [ 528.262305] -------------------------------- [ 528.267145] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage. [ 528.273953] ksoftirqd/1/17 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE0:SE0] takes: [ 528.280075] (&(&port->port_lock)->rlock){+.?.}, at: [<ffffffff815396a8>] dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.290043] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: [ 528.295570] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 528.299818] dbc_write_complete+0x27/0xa0 [ 528.304458] xhci_dbc_giveback+0xd1/0x200 [ 528.309098] xhci_dbc_flush_endpoint_requests+0x50/0x70 [ 528.315116] xhci_dbc_handle_events+0x696/0x7b0 [ 528.320349] process_one_work+0x1ee/0x6e0 [ 528.324988] worker_thread+0x4a/0x430 [ 528.329236] kthread+0x13e/0x170 [ 528.332992] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 [ 528.337141] irq event stamp: 2861 [ 528.340897] hardirqs last enabled at (2860): [<ffffffff810674ea>] tasklet_action+0x6a/0x250 [ 528.350460] hardirqs last disabled at (2861): [<ffffffff817dc1ef>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xf/0x40 [ 528.360219] softirqs last enabled at (2852): [<ffffffff817e0e8c>] __do_softirq+0x3dc/0x4f9 [ 528.369683] softirqs last disabled at (2857): [<ffffffff8106805b>] run_ksoftirqd+0x1b/0x60 [ 528.379048] [ 528.379048] other info that might help us debug this: [ 528.386443] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 528.386443] [ 528.393150] CPU0 [ 528.395917] ---- [ 528.398687] lock(&(&port->port_lock)->rlock); [ 528.403821] <Interrupt> [ 528.406786] lock(&(&port->port_lock)->rlock); [ 528.412116] [ 528.412116] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 528.412116] [ 528.418825] no locks held by ksoftirqd/1/17. [ 528.423662] [ 528.423662] stack backtrace: [ 528.428598] CPU: 1 PID: 17 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc1+ #1630 [ 528.436387] Call Trace: [ 528.439158] dump_stack+0x5e/0x8e [ 528.442914] print_usage_bug+0x1fc/0x220 [ 528.447357] mark_lock+0x4db/0x5a0 [ 528.451210] __lock_acquire+0x726/0x1130 [ 528.455655] ? __lock_acquire+0x557/0x1130 [ 528.460296] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x200 [ 528.464347] ? dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.468496] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x35/0x40 [ 528.473038] ? dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.477186] dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.481139] tasklet_action+0x1d2/0x250 [ 528.485483] __do_softirq+0x1dc/0x4f9 [ 528.489630] run_ksoftirqd+0x1b/0x60 [ 528.493682] smpboot_thread_fn+0x179/0x270 [ 528.498324] kthread+0x13e/0x170 [ 528.501981] ? sort_range+0x20/0x20 [ 528.505933] ? kthread_delayed_work_timer_fn+0x80/0x80 [ 528.511755] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 Fixes: dfba2174dc42 ("usb: xhci: Add DbC support in xHCI driver") Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-03-08 23:17:15 +08:00
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->port_lock, flags);
}
static void dbc_write_complete(struct xhci_dbc *dbc, struct dbc_request *req)
{
usb: xhci: dbc: Fix lockdep warning The xHCI DbC implementation might enter a deadlock situation because there is no sufficient protection against the shared data between process and softirq contexts. This can lead to the following lockdep warnings. This patch changes to use spin_{,un}lock_irq{save,restore} to avoid potential deadlock. [ 528.248084] ================================ [ 528.252914] WARNING: inconsistent lock state [ 528.257756] 4.15.0-rc1+ #1630 Not tainted [ 528.262305] -------------------------------- [ 528.267145] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage. [ 528.273953] ksoftirqd/1/17 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE0:SE0] takes: [ 528.280075] (&(&port->port_lock)->rlock){+.?.}, at: [<ffffffff815396a8>] dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.290043] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: [ 528.295570] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 528.299818] dbc_write_complete+0x27/0xa0 [ 528.304458] xhci_dbc_giveback+0xd1/0x200 [ 528.309098] xhci_dbc_flush_endpoint_requests+0x50/0x70 [ 528.315116] xhci_dbc_handle_events+0x696/0x7b0 [ 528.320349] process_one_work+0x1ee/0x6e0 [ 528.324988] worker_thread+0x4a/0x430 [ 528.329236] kthread+0x13e/0x170 [ 528.332992] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 [ 528.337141] irq event stamp: 2861 [ 528.340897] hardirqs last enabled at (2860): [<ffffffff810674ea>] tasklet_action+0x6a/0x250 [ 528.350460] hardirqs last disabled at (2861): [<ffffffff817dc1ef>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xf/0x40 [ 528.360219] softirqs last enabled at (2852): [<ffffffff817e0e8c>] __do_softirq+0x3dc/0x4f9 [ 528.369683] softirqs last disabled at (2857): [<ffffffff8106805b>] run_ksoftirqd+0x1b/0x60 [ 528.379048] [ 528.379048] other info that might help us debug this: [ 528.386443] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 528.386443] [ 528.393150] CPU0 [ 528.395917] ---- [ 528.398687] lock(&(&port->port_lock)->rlock); [ 528.403821] <Interrupt> [ 528.406786] lock(&(&port->port_lock)->rlock); [ 528.412116] [ 528.412116] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 528.412116] [ 528.418825] no locks held by ksoftirqd/1/17. [ 528.423662] [ 528.423662] stack backtrace: [ 528.428598] CPU: 1 PID: 17 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc1+ #1630 [ 528.436387] Call Trace: [ 528.439158] dump_stack+0x5e/0x8e [ 528.442914] print_usage_bug+0x1fc/0x220 [ 528.447357] mark_lock+0x4db/0x5a0 [ 528.451210] __lock_acquire+0x726/0x1130 [ 528.455655] ? __lock_acquire+0x557/0x1130 [ 528.460296] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x200 [ 528.464347] ? dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.468496] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x35/0x40 [ 528.473038] ? dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.477186] dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.481139] tasklet_action+0x1d2/0x250 [ 528.485483] __do_softirq+0x1dc/0x4f9 [ 528.489630] run_ksoftirqd+0x1b/0x60 [ 528.493682] smpboot_thread_fn+0x179/0x270 [ 528.498324] kthread+0x13e/0x170 [ 528.501981] ? sort_range+0x20/0x20 [ 528.505933] ? kthread_delayed_work_timer_fn+0x80/0x80 [ 528.511755] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 Fixes: dfba2174dc42 ("usb: xhci: Add DbC support in xHCI driver") Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-03-08 23:17:15 +08:00
unsigned long flags;
struct dbc_port *port = dbc_to_port(dbc);
usb: xhci: dbc: Fix lockdep warning The xHCI DbC implementation might enter a deadlock situation because there is no sufficient protection against the shared data between process and softirq contexts. This can lead to the following lockdep warnings. This patch changes to use spin_{,un}lock_irq{save,restore} to avoid potential deadlock. [ 528.248084] ================================ [ 528.252914] WARNING: inconsistent lock state [ 528.257756] 4.15.0-rc1+ #1630 Not tainted [ 528.262305] -------------------------------- [ 528.267145] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage. [ 528.273953] ksoftirqd/1/17 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE0:SE0] takes: [ 528.280075] (&(&port->port_lock)->rlock){+.?.}, at: [<ffffffff815396a8>] dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.290043] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: [ 528.295570] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 528.299818] dbc_write_complete+0x27/0xa0 [ 528.304458] xhci_dbc_giveback+0xd1/0x200 [ 528.309098] xhci_dbc_flush_endpoint_requests+0x50/0x70 [ 528.315116] xhci_dbc_handle_events+0x696/0x7b0 [ 528.320349] process_one_work+0x1ee/0x6e0 [ 528.324988] worker_thread+0x4a/0x430 [ 528.329236] kthread+0x13e/0x170 [ 528.332992] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 [ 528.337141] irq event stamp: 2861 [ 528.340897] hardirqs last enabled at (2860): [<ffffffff810674ea>] tasklet_action+0x6a/0x250 [ 528.350460] hardirqs last disabled at (2861): [<ffffffff817dc1ef>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xf/0x40 [ 528.360219] softirqs last enabled at (2852): [<ffffffff817e0e8c>] __do_softirq+0x3dc/0x4f9 [ 528.369683] softirqs last disabled at (2857): [<ffffffff8106805b>] run_ksoftirqd+0x1b/0x60 [ 528.379048] [ 528.379048] other info that might help us debug this: [ 528.386443] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 528.386443] [ 528.393150] CPU0 [ 528.395917] ---- [ 528.398687] lock(&(&port->port_lock)->rlock); [ 528.403821] <Interrupt> [ 528.406786] lock(&(&port->port_lock)->rlock); [ 528.412116] [ 528.412116] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 528.412116] [ 528.418825] no locks held by ksoftirqd/1/17. [ 528.423662] [ 528.423662] stack backtrace: [ 528.428598] CPU: 1 PID: 17 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc1+ #1630 [ 528.436387] Call Trace: [ 528.439158] dump_stack+0x5e/0x8e [ 528.442914] print_usage_bug+0x1fc/0x220 [ 528.447357] mark_lock+0x4db/0x5a0 [ 528.451210] __lock_acquire+0x726/0x1130 [ 528.455655] ? __lock_acquire+0x557/0x1130 [ 528.460296] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x200 [ 528.464347] ? dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.468496] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x35/0x40 [ 528.473038] ? dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.477186] dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.481139] tasklet_action+0x1d2/0x250 [ 528.485483] __do_softirq+0x1dc/0x4f9 [ 528.489630] run_ksoftirqd+0x1b/0x60 [ 528.493682] smpboot_thread_fn+0x179/0x270 [ 528.498324] kthread+0x13e/0x170 [ 528.501981] ? sort_range+0x20/0x20 [ 528.505933] ? kthread_delayed_work_timer_fn+0x80/0x80 [ 528.511755] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 Fixes: dfba2174dc42 ("usb: xhci: Add DbC support in xHCI driver") Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-03-08 23:17:15 +08:00
spin_lock_irqsave(&port->port_lock, flags);
list_add(&req->list_pool, &port->write_pool);
switch (req->status) {
case 0:
dbc_start_tx(port);
break;
case -ESHUTDOWN:
break;
default:
dev_warn(dbc->dev, "unexpected write complete status %d\n",
req->status);
break;
}
usb: xhci: dbc: Fix lockdep warning The xHCI DbC implementation might enter a deadlock situation because there is no sufficient protection against the shared data between process and softirq contexts. This can lead to the following lockdep warnings. This patch changes to use spin_{,un}lock_irq{save,restore} to avoid potential deadlock. [ 528.248084] ================================ [ 528.252914] WARNING: inconsistent lock state [ 528.257756] 4.15.0-rc1+ #1630 Not tainted [ 528.262305] -------------------------------- [ 528.267145] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage. [ 528.273953] ksoftirqd/1/17 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE0:SE0] takes: [ 528.280075] (&(&port->port_lock)->rlock){+.?.}, at: [<ffffffff815396a8>] dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.290043] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: [ 528.295570] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 528.299818] dbc_write_complete+0x27/0xa0 [ 528.304458] xhci_dbc_giveback+0xd1/0x200 [ 528.309098] xhci_dbc_flush_endpoint_requests+0x50/0x70 [ 528.315116] xhci_dbc_handle_events+0x696/0x7b0 [ 528.320349] process_one_work+0x1ee/0x6e0 [ 528.324988] worker_thread+0x4a/0x430 [ 528.329236] kthread+0x13e/0x170 [ 528.332992] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 [ 528.337141] irq event stamp: 2861 [ 528.340897] hardirqs last enabled at (2860): [<ffffffff810674ea>] tasklet_action+0x6a/0x250 [ 528.350460] hardirqs last disabled at (2861): [<ffffffff817dc1ef>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xf/0x40 [ 528.360219] softirqs last enabled at (2852): [<ffffffff817e0e8c>] __do_softirq+0x3dc/0x4f9 [ 528.369683] softirqs last disabled at (2857): [<ffffffff8106805b>] run_ksoftirqd+0x1b/0x60 [ 528.379048] [ 528.379048] other info that might help us debug this: [ 528.386443] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 528.386443] [ 528.393150] CPU0 [ 528.395917] ---- [ 528.398687] lock(&(&port->port_lock)->rlock); [ 528.403821] <Interrupt> [ 528.406786] lock(&(&port->port_lock)->rlock); [ 528.412116] [ 528.412116] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 528.412116] [ 528.418825] no locks held by ksoftirqd/1/17. [ 528.423662] [ 528.423662] stack backtrace: [ 528.428598] CPU: 1 PID: 17 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc1+ #1630 [ 528.436387] Call Trace: [ 528.439158] dump_stack+0x5e/0x8e [ 528.442914] print_usage_bug+0x1fc/0x220 [ 528.447357] mark_lock+0x4db/0x5a0 [ 528.451210] __lock_acquire+0x726/0x1130 [ 528.455655] ? __lock_acquire+0x557/0x1130 [ 528.460296] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x200 [ 528.464347] ? dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.468496] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x35/0x40 [ 528.473038] ? dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.477186] dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.481139] tasklet_action+0x1d2/0x250 [ 528.485483] __do_softirq+0x1dc/0x4f9 [ 528.489630] run_ksoftirqd+0x1b/0x60 [ 528.493682] smpboot_thread_fn+0x179/0x270 [ 528.498324] kthread+0x13e/0x170 [ 528.501981] ? sort_range+0x20/0x20 [ 528.505933] ? kthread_delayed_work_timer_fn+0x80/0x80 [ 528.511755] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 Fixes: dfba2174dc42 ("usb: xhci: Add DbC support in xHCI driver") Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-03-08 23:17:15 +08:00
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->port_lock, flags);
}
static void xhci_dbc_free_req(struct dbc_request *req)
{
kfree(req->buf);
dbc_free_request(req);
}
static int
xhci_dbc_alloc_requests(struct xhci_dbc *dbc, unsigned int direction,
struct list_head *head,
void (*fn)(struct xhci_dbc *, struct dbc_request *))
{
int i;
struct dbc_request *req;
for (i = 0; i < DBC_QUEUE_SIZE; i++) {
req = dbc_alloc_request(dbc, direction, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!req)
break;
req->length = DBC_MAX_PACKET;
req->buf = kmalloc(req->length, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!req->buf) {
dbc_free_request(req);
break;
}
req->complete = fn;
list_add_tail(&req->list_pool, head);
}
return list_empty(head) ? -ENOMEM : 0;
}
static void
xhci_dbc_free_requests(struct list_head *head)
{
struct dbc_request *req;
while (!list_empty(head)) {
req = list_entry(head->next, struct dbc_request, list_pool);
list_del(&req->list_pool);
xhci_dbc_free_req(req);
}
}
static int dbc_tty_install(struct tty_driver *driver, struct tty_struct *tty)
{
struct dbc_port *port = driver->driver_state;
tty->driver_data = port;
return tty_port_install(&port->port, driver, tty);
}
static int dbc_tty_open(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *file)
{
struct dbc_port *port = tty->driver_data;
return tty_port_open(&port->port, tty, file);
}
static void dbc_tty_close(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *file)
{
struct dbc_port *port = tty->driver_data;
tty_port_close(&port->port, tty, file);
}
static int dbc_tty_write(struct tty_struct *tty,
const unsigned char *buf,
int count)
{
struct dbc_port *port = tty->driver_data;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&port->port_lock, flags);
if (count)
count = kfifo_in(&port->write_fifo, buf, count);
dbc_start_tx(port);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->port_lock, flags);
return count;
}
static int dbc_tty_put_char(struct tty_struct *tty, unsigned char ch)
{
struct dbc_port *port = tty->driver_data;
unsigned long flags;
int status;
spin_lock_irqsave(&port->port_lock, flags);
status = kfifo_put(&port->write_fifo, ch);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->port_lock, flags);
return status;
}
static void dbc_tty_flush_chars(struct tty_struct *tty)
{
struct dbc_port *port = tty->driver_data;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&port->port_lock, flags);
dbc_start_tx(port);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->port_lock, flags);
}
static int dbc_tty_write_room(struct tty_struct *tty)
{
struct dbc_port *port = tty->driver_data;
unsigned long flags;
int room = 0;
spin_lock_irqsave(&port->port_lock, flags);
room = kfifo_avail(&port->write_fifo);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->port_lock, flags);
return room;
}
static int dbc_tty_chars_in_buffer(struct tty_struct *tty)
{
struct dbc_port *port = tty->driver_data;
unsigned long flags;
int chars = 0;
spin_lock_irqsave(&port->port_lock, flags);
chars = kfifo_len(&port->write_fifo);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->port_lock, flags);
return chars;
}
static void dbc_tty_unthrottle(struct tty_struct *tty)
{
struct dbc_port *port = tty->driver_data;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&port->port_lock, flags);
tasklet_schedule(&port->push);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->port_lock, flags);
}
static const struct tty_operations dbc_tty_ops = {
.install = dbc_tty_install,
.open = dbc_tty_open,
.close = dbc_tty_close,
.write = dbc_tty_write,
.put_char = dbc_tty_put_char,
.flush_chars = dbc_tty_flush_chars,
.write_room = dbc_tty_write_room,
.chars_in_buffer = dbc_tty_chars_in_buffer,
.unthrottle = dbc_tty_unthrottle,
};
static void dbc_rx_push(unsigned long _port)
{
struct dbc_request *req;
struct tty_struct *tty;
usb: xhci: dbc: Fix lockdep warning The xHCI DbC implementation might enter a deadlock situation because there is no sufficient protection against the shared data between process and softirq contexts. This can lead to the following lockdep warnings. This patch changes to use spin_{,un}lock_irq{save,restore} to avoid potential deadlock. [ 528.248084] ================================ [ 528.252914] WARNING: inconsistent lock state [ 528.257756] 4.15.0-rc1+ #1630 Not tainted [ 528.262305] -------------------------------- [ 528.267145] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage. [ 528.273953] ksoftirqd/1/17 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE0:SE0] takes: [ 528.280075] (&(&port->port_lock)->rlock){+.?.}, at: [<ffffffff815396a8>] dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.290043] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: [ 528.295570] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 528.299818] dbc_write_complete+0x27/0xa0 [ 528.304458] xhci_dbc_giveback+0xd1/0x200 [ 528.309098] xhci_dbc_flush_endpoint_requests+0x50/0x70 [ 528.315116] xhci_dbc_handle_events+0x696/0x7b0 [ 528.320349] process_one_work+0x1ee/0x6e0 [ 528.324988] worker_thread+0x4a/0x430 [ 528.329236] kthread+0x13e/0x170 [ 528.332992] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 [ 528.337141] irq event stamp: 2861 [ 528.340897] hardirqs last enabled at (2860): [<ffffffff810674ea>] tasklet_action+0x6a/0x250 [ 528.350460] hardirqs last disabled at (2861): [<ffffffff817dc1ef>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xf/0x40 [ 528.360219] softirqs last enabled at (2852): [<ffffffff817e0e8c>] __do_softirq+0x3dc/0x4f9 [ 528.369683] softirqs last disabled at (2857): [<ffffffff8106805b>] run_ksoftirqd+0x1b/0x60 [ 528.379048] [ 528.379048] other info that might help us debug this: [ 528.386443] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 528.386443] [ 528.393150] CPU0 [ 528.395917] ---- [ 528.398687] lock(&(&port->port_lock)->rlock); [ 528.403821] <Interrupt> [ 528.406786] lock(&(&port->port_lock)->rlock); [ 528.412116] [ 528.412116] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 528.412116] [ 528.418825] no locks held by ksoftirqd/1/17. [ 528.423662] [ 528.423662] stack backtrace: [ 528.428598] CPU: 1 PID: 17 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc1+ #1630 [ 528.436387] Call Trace: [ 528.439158] dump_stack+0x5e/0x8e [ 528.442914] print_usage_bug+0x1fc/0x220 [ 528.447357] mark_lock+0x4db/0x5a0 [ 528.451210] __lock_acquire+0x726/0x1130 [ 528.455655] ? __lock_acquire+0x557/0x1130 [ 528.460296] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x200 [ 528.464347] ? dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.468496] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x35/0x40 [ 528.473038] ? dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.477186] dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.481139] tasklet_action+0x1d2/0x250 [ 528.485483] __do_softirq+0x1dc/0x4f9 [ 528.489630] run_ksoftirqd+0x1b/0x60 [ 528.493682] smpboot_thread_fn+0x179/0x270 [ 528.498324] kthread+0x13e/0x170 [ 528.501981] ? sort_range+0x20/0x20 [ 528.505933] ? kthread_delayed_work_timer_fn+0x80/0x80 [ 528.511755] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 Fixes: dfba2174dc42 ("usb: xhci: Add DbC support in xHCI driver") Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-03-08 23:17:15 +08:00
unsigned long flags;
bool do_push = false;
bool disconnect = false;
struct dbc_port *port = (void *)_port;
struct list_head *queue = &port->read_queue;
usb: xhci: dbc: Fix lockdep warning The xHCI DbC implementation might enter a deadlock situation because there is no sufficient protection against the shared data between process and softirq contexts. This can lead to the following lockdep warnings. This patch changes to use spin_{,un}lock_irq{save,restore} to avoid potential deadlock. [ 528.248084] ================================ [ 528.252914] WARNING: inconsistent lock state [ 528.257756] 4.15.0-rc1+ #1630 Not tainted [ 528.262305] -------------------------------- [ 528.267145] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage. [ 528.273953] ksoftirqd/1/17 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE0:SE0] takes: [ 528.280075] (&(&port->port_lock)->rlock){+.?.}, at: [<ffffffff815396a8>] dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.290043] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: [ 528.295570] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 528.299818] dbc_write_complete+0x27/0xa0 [ 528.304458] xhci_dbc_giveback+0xd1/0x200 [ 528.309098] xhci_dbc_flush_endpoint_requests+0x50/0x70 [ 528.315116] xhci_dbc_handle_events+0x696/0x7b0 [ 528.320349] process_one_work+0x1ee/0x6e0 [ 528.324988] worker_thread+0x4a/0x430 [ 528.329236] kthread+0x13e/0x170 [ 528.332992] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 [ 528.337141] irq event stamp: 2861 [ 528.340897] hardirqs last enabled at (2860): [<ffffffff810674ea>] tasklet_action+0x6a/0x250 [ 528.350460] hardirqs last disabled at (2861): [<ffffffff817dc1ef>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xf/0x40 [ 528.360219] softirqs last enabled at (2852): [<ffffffff817e0e8c>] __do_softirq+0x3dc/0x4f9 [ 528.369683] softirqs last disabled at (2857): [<ffffffff8106805b>] run_ksoftirqd+0x1b/0x60 [ 528.379048] [ 528.379048] other info that might help us debug this: [ 528.386443] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 528.386443] [ 528.393150] CPU0 [ 528.395917] ---- [ 528.398687] lock(&(&port->port_lock)->rlock); [ 528.403821] <Interrupt> [ 528.406786] lock(&(&port->port_lock)->rlock); [ 528.412116] [ 528.412116] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 528.412116] [ 528.418825] no locks held by ksoftirqd/1/17. [ 528.423662] [ 528.423662] stack backtrace: [ 528.428598] CPU: 1 PID: 17 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc1+ #1630 [ 528.436387] Call Trace: [ 528.439158] dump_stack+0x5e/0x8e [ 528.442914] print_usage_bug+0x1fc/0x220 [ 528.447357] mark_lock+0x4db/0x5a0 [ 528.451210] __lock_acquire+0x726/0x1130 [ 528.455655] ? __lock_acquire+0x557/0x1130 [ 528.460296] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x200 [ 528.464347] ? dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.468496] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x35/0x40 [ 528.473038] ? dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.477186] dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.481139] tasklet_action+0x1d2/0x250 [ 528.485483] __do_softirq+0x1dc/0x4f9 [ 528.489630] run_ksoftirqd+0x1b/0x60 [ 528.493682] smpboot_thread_fn+0x179/0x270 [ 528.498324] kthread+0x13e/0x170 [ 528.501981] ? sort_range+0x20/0x20 [ 528.505933] ? kthread_delayed_work_timer_fn+0x80/0x80 [ 528.511755] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 Fixes: dfba2174dc42 ("usb: xhci: Add DbC support in xHCI driver") Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-03-08 23:17:15 +08:00
spin_lock_irqsave(&port->port_lock, flags);
tty = port->port.tty;
while (!list_empty(queue)) {
req = list_first_entry(queue, struct dbc_request, list_pool);
if (tty && tty_throttled(tty))
break;
switch (req->status) {
case 0:
break;
case -ESHUTDOWN:
disconnect = true;
break;
default:
pr_warn("ttyDBC0: unexpected RX status %d\n",
req->status);
break;
}
if (req->actual) {
char *packet = req->buf;
unsigned int n, size = req->actual;
int count;
n = port->n_read;
if (n) {
packet += n;
size -= n;
}
count = tty_insert_flip_string(&port->port, packet,
size);
if (count)
do_push = true;
if (count != size) {
port->n_read += count;
break;
}
port->n_read = 0;
}
list_move(&req->list_pool, &port->read_pool);
}
if (do_push)
tty_flip_buffer_push(&port->port);
if (!list_empty(queue) && tty) {
if (!tty_throttled(tty)) {
if (do_push)
tasklet_schedule(&port->push);
else
pr_warn("ttyDBC0: RX not scheduled?\n");
}
}
if (!disconnect)
dbc_start_rx(port);
usb: xhci: dbc: Fix lockdep warning The xHCI DbC implementation might enter a deadlock situation because there is no sufficient protection against the shared data between process and softirq contexts. This can lead to the following lockdep warnings. This patch changes to use spin_{,un}lock_irq{save,restore} to avoid potential deadlock. [ 528.248084] ================================ [ 528.252914] WARNING: inconsistent lock state [ 528.257756] 4.15.0-rc1+ #1630 Not tainted [ 528.262305] -------------------------------- [ 528.267145] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage. [ 528.273953] ksoftirqd/1/17 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE0:SE0] takes: [ 528.280075] (&(&port->port_lock)->rlock){+.?.}, at: [<ffffffff815396a8>] dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.290043] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: [ 528.295570] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 528.299818] dbc_write_complete+0x27/0xa0 [ 528.304458] xhci_dbc_giveback+0xd1/0x200 [ 528.309098] xhci_dbc_flush_endpoint_requests+0x50/0x70 [ 528.315116] xhci_dbc_handle_events+0x696/0x7b0 [ 528.320349] process_one_work+0x1ee/0x6e0 [ 528.324988] worker_thread+0x4a/0x430 [ 528.329236] kthread+0x13e/0x170 [ 528.332992] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 [ 528.337141] irq event stamp: 2861 [ 528.340897] hardirqs last enabled at (2860): [<ffffffff810674ea>] tasklet_action+0x6a/0x250 [ 528.350460] hardirqs last disabled at (2861): [<ffffffff817dc1ef>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xf/0x40 [ 528.360219] softirqs last enabled at (2852): [<ffffffff817e0e8c>] __do_softirq+0x3dc/0x4f9 [ 528.369683] softirqs last disabled at (2857): [<ffffffff8106805b>] run_ksoftirqd+0x1b/0x60 [ 528.379048] [ 528.379048] other info that might help us debug this: [ 528.386443] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 528.386443] [ 528.393150] CPU0 [ 528.395917] ---- [ 528.398687] lock(&(&port->port_lock)->rlock); [ 528.403821] <Interrupt> [ 528.406786] lock(&(&port->port_lock)->rlock); [ 528.412116] [ 528.412116] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 528.412116] [ 528.418825] no locks held by ksoftirqd/1/17. [ 528.423662] [ 528.423662] stack backtrace: [ 528.428598] CPU: 1 PID: 17 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc1+ #1630 [ 528.436387] Call Trace: [ 528.439158] dump_stack+0x5e/0x8e [ 528.442914] print_usage_bug+0x1fc/0x220 [ 528.447357] mark_lock+0x4db/0x5a0 [ 528.451210] __lock_acquire+0x726/0x1130 [ 528.455655] ? __lock_acquire+0x557/0x1130 [ 528.460296] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x200 [ 528.464347] ? dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.468496] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x35/0x40 [ 528.473038] ? dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.477186] dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.481139] tasklet_action+0x1d2/0x250 [ 528.485483] __do_softirq+0x1dc/0x4f9 [ 528.489630] run_ksoftirqd+0x1b/0x60 [ 528.493682] smpboot_thread_fn+0x179/0x270 [ 528.498324] kthread+0x13e/0x170 [ 528.501981] ? sort_range+0x20/0x20 [ 528.505933] ? kthread_delayed_work_timer_fn+0x80/0x80 [ 528.511755] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 Fixes: dfba2174dc42 ("usb: xhci: Add DbC support in xHCI driver") Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-03-08 23:17:15 +08:00
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->port_lock, flags);
}
static int dbc_port_activate(struct tty_port *_port, struct tty_struct *tty)
{
usb: xhci: dbc: Fix lockdep warning The xHCI DbC implementation might enter a deadlock situation because there is no sufficient protection against the shared data between process and softirq contexts. This can lead to the following lockdep warnings. This patch changes to use spin_{,un}lock_irq{save,restore} to avoid potential deadlock. [ 528.248084] ================================ [ 528.252914] WARNING: inconsistent lock state [ 528.257756] 4.15.0-rc1+ #1630 Not tainted [ 528.262305] -------------------------------- [ 528.267145] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage. [ 528.273953] ksoftirqd/1/17 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE0:SE0] takes: [ 528.280075] (&(&port->port_lock)->rlock){+.?.}, at: [<ffffffff815396a8>] dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.290043] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: [ 528.295570] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 528.299818] dbc_write_complete+0x27/0xa0 [ 528.304458] xhci_dbc_giveback+0xd1/0x200 [ 528.309098] xhci_dbc_flush_endpoint_requests+0x50/0x70 [ 528.315116] xhci_dbc_handle_events+0x696/0x7b0 [ 528.320349] process_one_work+0x1ee/0x6e0 [ 528.324988] worker_thread+0x4a/0x430 [ 528.329236] kthread+0x13e/0x170 [ 528.332992] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 [ 528.337141] irq event stamp: 2861 [ 528.340897] hardirqs last enabled at (2860): [<ffffffff810674ea>] tasklet_action+0x6a/0x250 [ 528.350460] hardirqs last disabled at (2861): [<ffffffff817dc1ef>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xf/0x40 [ 528.360219] softirqs last enabled at (2852): [<ffffffff817e0e8c>] __do_softirq+0x3dc/0x4f9 [ 528.369683] softirqs last disabled at (2857): [<ffffffff8106805b>] run_ksoftirqd+0x1b/0x60 [ 528.379048] [ 528.379048] other info that might help us debug this: [ 528.386443] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 528.386443] [ 528.393150] CPU0 [ 528.395917] ---- [ 528.398687] lock(&(&port->port_lock)->rlock); [ 528.403821] <Interrupt> [ 528.406786] lock(&(&port->port_lock)->rlock); [ 528.412116] [ 528.412116] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 528.412116] [ 528.418825] no locks held by ksoftirqd/1/17. [ 528.423662] [ 528.423662] stack backtrace: [ 528.428598] CPU: 1 PID: 17 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc1+ #1630 [ 528.436387] Call Trace: [ 528.439158] dump_stack+0x5e/0x8e [ 528.442914] print_usage_bug+0x1fc/0x220 [ 528.447357] mark_lock+0x4db/0x5a0 [ 528.451210] __lock_acquire+0x726/0x1130 [ 528.455655] ? __lock_acquire+0x557/0x1130 [ 528.460296] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x200 [ 528.464347] ? dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.468496] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x35/0x40 [ 528.473038] ? dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.477186] dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.481139] tasklet_action+0x1d2/0x250 [ 528.485483] __do_softirq+0x1dc/0x4f9 [ 528.489630] run_ksoftirqd+0x1b/0x60 [ 528.493682] smpboot_thread_fn+0x179/0x270 [ 528.498324] kthread+0x13e/0x170 [ 528.501981] ? sort_range+0x20/0x20 [ 528.505933] ? kthread_delayed_work_timer_fn+0x80/0x80 [ 528.511755] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 Fixes: dfba2174dc42 ("usb: xhci: Add DbC support in xHCI driver") Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-03-08 23:17:15 +08:00
unsigned long flags;
struct dbc_port *port = container_of(_port, struct dbc_port, port);
usb: xhci: dbc: Fix lockdep warning The xHCI DbC implementation might enter a deadlock situation because there is no sufficient protection against the shared data between process and softirq contexts. This can lead to the following lockdep warnings. This patch changes to use spin_{,un}lock_irq{save,restore} to avoid potential deadlock. [ 528.248084] ================================ [ 528.252914] WARNING: inconsistent lock state [ 528.257756] 4.15.0-rc1+ #1630 Not tainted [ 528.262305] -------------------------------- [ 528.267145] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage. [ 528.273953] ksoftirqd/1/17 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE0:SE0] takes: [ 528.280075] (&(&port->port_lock)->rlock){+.?.}, at: [<ffffffff815396a8>] dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.290043] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: [ 528.295570] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 528.299818] dbc_write_complete+0x27/0xa0 [ 528.304458] xhci_dbc_giveback+0xd1/0x200 [ 528.309098] xhci_dbc_flush_endpoint_requests+0x50/0x70 [ 528.315116] xhci_dbc_handle_events+0x696/0x7b0 [ 528.320349] process_one_work+0x1ee/0x6e0 [ 528.324988] worker_thread+0x4a/0x430 [ 528.329236] kthread+0x13e/0x170 [ 528.332992] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 [ 528.337141] irq event stamp: 2861 [ 528.340897] hardirqs last enabled at (2860): [<ffffffff810674ea>] tasklet_action+0x6a/0x250 [ 528.350460] hardirqs last disabled at (2861): [<ffffffff817dc1ef>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xf/0x40 [ 528.360219] softirqs last enabled at (2852): [<ffffffff817e0e8c>] __do_softirq+0x3dc/0x4f9 [ 528.369683] softirqs last disabled at (2857): [<ffffffff8106805b>] run_ksoftirqd+0x1b/0x60 [ 528.379048] [ 528.379048] other info that might help us debug this: [ 528.386443] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 528.386443] [ 528.393150] CPU0 [ 528.395917] ---- [ 528.398687] lock(&(&port->port_lock)->rlock); [ 528.403821] <Interrupt> [ 528.406786] lock(&(&port->port_lock)->rlock); [ 528.412116] [ 528.412116] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 528.412116] [ 528.418825] no locks held by ksoftirqd/1/17. [ 528.423662] [ 528.423662] stack backtrace: [ 528.428598] CPU: 1 PID: 17 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc1+ #1630 [ 528.436387] Call Trace: [ 528.439158] dump_stack+0x5e/0x8e [ 528.442914] print_usage_bug+0x1fc/0x220 [ 528.447357] mark_lock+0x4db/0x5a0 [ 528.451210] __lock_acquire+0x726/0x1130 [ 528.455655] ? __lock_acquire+0x557/0x1130 [ 528.460296] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x200 [ 528.464347] ? dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.468496] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x35/0x40 [ 528.473038] ? dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.477186] dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.481139] tasklet_action+0x1d2/0x250 [ 528.485483] __do_softirq+0x1dc/0x4f9 [ 528.489630] run_ksoftirqd+0x1b/0x60 [ 528.493682] smpboot_thread_fn+0x179/0x270 [ 528.498324] kthread+0x13e/0x170 [ 528.501981] ? sort_range+0x20/0x20 [ 528.505933] ? kthread_delayed_work_timer_fn+0x80/0x80 [ 528.511755] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 Fixes: dfba2174dc42 ("usb: xhci: Add DbC support in xHCI driver") Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-03-08 23:17:15 +08:00
spin_lock_irqsave(&port->port_lock, flags);
dbc_start_rx(port);
usb: xhci: dbc: Fix lockdep warning The xHCI DbC implementation might enter a deadlock situation because there is no sufficient protection against the shared data between process and softirq contexts. This can lead to the following lockdep warnings. This patch changes to use spin_{,un}lock_irq{save,restore} to avoid potential deadlock. [ 528.248084] ================================ [ 528.252914] WARNING: inconsistent lock state [ 528.257756] 4.15.0-rc1+ #1630 Not tainted [ 528.262305] -------------------------------- [ 528.267145] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage. [ 528.273953] ksoftirqd/1/17 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE0:SE0] takes: [ 528.280075] (&(&port->port_lock)->rlock){+.?.}, at: [<ffffffff815396a8>] dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.290043] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: [ 528.295570] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 528.299818] dbc_write_complete+0x27/0xa0 [ 528.304458] xhci_dbc_giveback+0xd1/0x200 [ 528.309098] xhci_dbc_flush_endpoint_requests+0x50/0x70 [ 528.315116] xhci_dbc_handle_events+0x696/0x7b0 [ 528.320349] process_one_work+0x1ee/0x6e0 [ 528.324988] worker_thread+0x4a/0x430 [ 528.329236] kthread+0x13e/0x170 [ 528.332992] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 [ 528.337141] irq event stamp: 2861 [ 528.340897] hardirqs last enabled at (2860): [<ffffffff810674ea>] tasklet_action+0x6a/0x250 [ 528.350460] hardirqs last disabled at (2861): [<ffffffff817dc1ef>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xf/0x40 [ 528.360219] softirqs last enabled at (2852): [<ffffffff817e0e8c>] __do_softirq+0x3dc/0x4f9 [ 528.369683] softirqs last disabled at (2857): [<ffffffff8106805b>] run_ksoftirqd+0x1b/0x60 [ 528.379048] [ 528.379048] other info that might help us debug this: [ 528.386443] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 528.386443] [ 528.393150] CPU0 [ 528.395917] ---- [ 528.398687] lock(&(&port->port_lock)->rlock); [ 528.403821] <Interrupt> [ 528.406786] lock(&(&port->port_lock)->rlock); [ 528.412116] [ 528.412116] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 528.412116] [ 528.418825] no locks held by ksoftirqd/1/17. [ 528.423662] [ 528.423662] stack backtrace: [ 528.428598] CPU: 1 PID: 17 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc1+ #1630 [ 528.436387] Call Trace: [ 528.439158] dump_stack+0x5e/0x8e [ 528.442914] print_usage_bug+0x1fc/0x220 [ 528.447357] mark_lock+0x4db/0x5a0 [ 528.451210] __lock_acquire+0x726/0x1130 [ 528.455655] ? __lock_acquire+0x557/0x1130 [ 528.460296] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x200 [ 528.464347] ? dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.468496] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x35/0x40 [ 528.473038] ? dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.477186] dbc_rx_push+0x38/0x1c0 [ 528.481139] tasklet_action+0x1d2/0x250 [ 528.485483] __do_softirq+0x1dc/0x4f9 [ 528.489630] run_ksoftirqd+0x1b/0x60 [ 528.493682] smpboot_thread_fn+0x179/0x270 [ 528.498324] kthread+0x13e/0x170 [ 528.501981] ? sort_range+0x20/0x20 [ 528.505933] ? kthread_delayed_work_timer_fn+0x80/0x80 [ 528.511755] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 Fixes: dfba2174dc42 ("usb: xhci: Add DbC support in xHCI driver") Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-03-08 23:17:15 +08:00
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->port_lock, flags);
return 0;
}
static const struct tty_port_operations dbc_port_ops = {
.activate = dbc_port_activate,
};
static void
xhci_dbc_tty_init_port(struct xhci_dbc *dbc, struct dbc_port *port)
{
tty_port_init(&port->port);
spin_lock_init(&port->port_lock);
tasklet_init(&port->push, dbc_rx_push, (unsigned long)port);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&port->read_pool);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&port->read_queue);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&port->write_pool);
port->port.ops = &dbc_port_ops;
port->n_read = 0;
}
static void
xhci_dbc_tty_exit_port(struct dbc_port *port)
{
tasklet_kill(&port->push);
tty_port_destroy(&port->port);
}
static int xhci_dbc_tty_register_device(struct xhci_dbc *dbc)
{
int ret;
struct device *tty_dev;
struct dbc_port *port = dbc_to_port(dbc);
if (port->registered)
return -EBUSY;
xhci_dbc_tty_init_port(dbc, port);
tty_dev = tty_port_register_device(&port->port,
dbc_tty_driver, 0, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(tty_dev)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(tty_dev);
goto register_fail;
}
ret = kfifo_alloc(&port->write_fifo, DBC_WRITE_BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
if (ret)
goto buf_alloc_fail;
ret = xhci_dbc_alloc_requests(dbc, BULK_IN, &port->read_pool,
dbc_read_complete);
if (ret)
goto request_fail;
ret = xhci_dbc_alloc_requests(dbc, BULK_OUT, &port->write_pool,
dbc_write_complete);
if (ret)
goto request_fail;
port->registered = true;
return 0;
request_fail:
xhci_dbc_free_requests(&port->read_pool);
xhci_dbc_free_requests(&port->write_pool);
kfifo_free(&port->write_fifo);
buf_alloc_fail:
tty_unregister_device(dbc_tty_driver, 0);
register_fail:
xhci_dbc_tty_exit_port(port);
dev_err(dbc->dev, "can't register tty port, err %d\n", ret);
return ret;
}
static void xhci_dbc_tty_unregister_device(struct xhci_dbc *dbc)
{
struct dbc_port *port = dbc_to_port(dbc);
if (!port->registered)
return;
tty_unregister_device(dbc_tty_driver, 0);
xhci_dbc_tty_exit_port(port);
port->registered = false;
kfifo_free(&port->write_fifo);
xhci_dbc_free_requests(&port->read_pool);
xhci_dbc_free_requests(&port->read_queue);
xhci_dbc_free_requests(&port->write_pool);
}
static const struct dbc_driver dbc_driver = {
.configure = xhci_dbc_tty_register_device,
.disconnect = xhci_dbc_tty_unregister_device,
};
int xhci_dbc_tty_probe(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
{
struct xhci_dbc *dbc = xhci->dbc;
struct dbc_port *port;
int status;
/* dbc_tty_init will be called by module init() in the future */
status = dbc_tty_init();
if (status)
return status;
port = kzalloc(sizeof(*port), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!port) {
status = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
dbc->driver = &dbc_driver;
dbc->priv = port;
dbc_tty_driver->driver_state = port;
return 0;
out:
/* dbc_tty_exit will be called by module_exit() in the future */
dbc_tty_exit();
return status;
}
/*
* undo what probe did, assume dbc is stopped already.
* we also assume tty_unregister_device() is called before this
*/
void xhci_dbc_tty_remove(struct xhci_dbc *dbc)
{
struct dbc_port *port = dbc_to_port(dbc);
dbc->driver = NULL;
dbc->priv = NULL;
kfree(port);
/* dbc_tty_exit will be called by module_exit() in the future */
dbc_tty_exit();
}
static int dbc_tty_init(void)
{
int ret;
dbc_tty_driver = tty_alloc_driver(1, TTY_DRIVER_REAL_RAW |
TTY_DRIVER_DYNAMIC_DEV);
if (IS_ERR(dbc_tty_driver))
return PTR_ERR(dbc_tty_driver);
dbc_tty_driver->driver_name = "dbc_serial";
dbc_tty_driver->name = "ttyDBC";
dbc_tty_driver->type = TTY_DRIVER_TYPE_SERIAL;
dbc_tty_driver->subtype = SERIAL_TYPE_NORMAL;
dbc_tty_driver->init_termios = tty_std_termios;
dbc_tty_driver->init_termios.c_cflag =
B9600 | CS8 | CREAD | HUPCL | CLOCAL;
dbc_tty_driver->init_termios.c_ispeed = 9600;
dbc_tty_driver->init_termios.c_ospeed = 9600;
tty_set_operations(dbc_tty_driver, &dbc_tty_ops);
ret = tty_register_driver(dbc_tty_driver);
if (ret) {
pr_err("Can't register dbc tty driver\n");
put_tty_driver(dbc_tty_driver);
}
return ret;
}
static void dbc_tty_exit(void)
{
if (dbc_tty_driver) {
tty_unregister_driver(dbc_tty_driver);
put_tty_driver(dbc_tty_driver);
dbc_tty_driver = NULL;
}
}