OpenCloudOS-Kernel/sound/firewire/digi00x/digi00x-pcm.c

361 lines
8.8 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
/*
* digi00x-pcm.c - a part of driver for Digidesign Digi 002/003 family
*
* Copyright (c) 2014-2015 Takashi Sakamoto
*/
#include "digi00x.h"
static int hw_rule_rate(struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params,
struct snd_pcm_hw_rule *rule)
{
struct snd_interval *r =
hw_param_interval(params, SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_RATE);
const struct snd_interval *c =
hw_param_interval_c(params, SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_CHANNELS);
struct snd_interval t = {
.min = UINT_MAX, .max = 0, .integer = 1,
};
unsigned int i;
for (i = 0; i < SND_DG00X_RATE_COUNT; i++) {
if (!snd_interval_test(c,
snd_dg00x_stream_pcm_channels[i]))
continue;
t.min = min(t.min, snd_dg00x_stream_rates[i]);
t.max = max(t.max, snd_dg00x_stream_rates[i]);
}
return snd_interval_refine(r, &t);
}
static int hw_rule_channels(struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params,
struct snd_pcm_hw_rule *rule)
{
struct snd_interval *c =
hw_param_interval(params, SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_CHANNELS);
const struct snd_interval *r =
hw_param_interval_c(params, SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_RATE);
struct snd_interval t = {
.min = UINT_MAX, .max = 0, .integer = 1,
};
unsigned int i;
for (i = 0; i < SND_DG00X_RATE_COUNT; i++) {
if (!snd_interval_test(r, snd_dg00x_stream_rates[i]))
continue;
t.min = min(t.min, snd_dg00x_stream_pcm_channels[i]);
t.max = max(t.max, snd_dg00x_stream_pcm_channels[i]);
}
return snd_interval_refine(c, &t);
}
static int pcm_init_hw_params(struct snd_dg00x *dg00x,
struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
{
struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime = substream->runtime;
struct snd_pcm_hardware *hw = &runtime->hw;
struct amdtp_stream *s;
int err;
if (substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE) {
substream->runtime->hw.formats = SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S32;
s = &dg00x->tx_stream;
} else {
substream->runtime->hw.formats = SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S32;
s = &dg00x->rx_stream;
}
hw->channels_min = 10;
hw->channels_max = 18;
hw->rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_44100 |
SNDRV_PCM_RATE_48000 |
SNDRV_PCM_RATE_88200 |
SNDRV_PCM_RATE_96000;
snd_pcm_limit_hw_rates(runtime);
err = snd_pcm_hw_rule_add(substream->runtime, 0,
SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_CHANNELS,
hw_rule_channels, NULL,
SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_RATE, -1);
if (err < 0)
return err;
err = snd_pcm_hw_rule_add(substream->runtime, 0,
SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_RATE,
hw_rule_rate, NULL,
SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_CHANNELS, -1);
if (err < 0)
return err;
return amdtp_dot_add_pcm_hw_constraints(s, substream->runtime);
}
static int pcm_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
{
struct snd_dg00x *dg00x = substream->private_data;
ALSA: firewire-digi00x: use the same size of period for PCM substream in AMDTP streams In current implementation, when opening a PCM substream, it's needed to check whether the opposite PCM substream runs. This is to assign effectual constraints (e.g. sampling rate) to opened PCM substream. The number of PCM substreams and MIDI substreams on AMDTP streams in domain is recorded in own structure. Usage of this count is an alternative of the above check. This is better because the count is incremented in pcm.hw_params earlier than pcm.trigger. This idea has one issue because it's incremented for MIDI substreams as well. In current implementation, for a case that any MIDI substream run and a PCM substream is going to start, PCM application to start the PCM substream can decide hardware parameters by restart packet streaming. Just checking the substream count can brings regression. Now AMDTP domain structure has a member for the size of PCM period in PCM substream which starts AMDTP streams in domain. When the value has zero and the substream count is greater than 1, it means that any MIDI substream starts AMDTP streams in domain. Usage of the value can resolve the above issue. This commit replaces the check with the substream count and the value for the size of PCM period. I note that DOT AMDTP protocol has a quirk to use different transmission method of IEC 61883-6 for tx/rx streams; non-blocking in tx stream and blocking in rx stream. Although the difference of transmission method between tx/rx streams precisely brings different timing for a certain amount of events due to their different calculation for data blocks per packet, it's possible to approximate enough amount of events mostly has the same timing. Actually current ALSA IEC 61883-1/6 engine uses large amount of data blocks for each hardware IRQ (=16 packets). Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191007110532.30270-15-o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
2019-10-07 19:05:29 +08:00
struct amdtp_domain *d = &dg00x->domain;
enum snd_dg00x_clock clock;
bool detect;
int err;
err = snd_dg00x_stream_lock_try(dg00x);
if (err < 0)
ALSA: firewire-digi00x: use the same size of period for PCM substream in AMDTP streams In current implementation, when opening a PCM substream, it's needed to check whether the opposite PCM substream runs. This is to assign effectual constraints (e.g. sampling rate) to opened PCM substream. The number of PCM substreams and MIDI substreams on AMDTP streams in domain is recorded in own structure. Usage of this count is an alternative of the above check. This is better because the count is incremented in pcm.hw_params earlier than pcm.trigger. This idea has one issue because it's incremented for MIDI substreams as well. In current implementation, for a case that any MIDI substream run and a PCM substream is going to start, PCM application to start the PCM substream can decide hardware parameters by restart packet streaming. Just checking the substream count can brings regression. Now AMDTP domain structure has a member for the size of PCM period in PCM substream which starts AMDTP streams in domain. When the value has zero and the substream count is greater than 1, it means that any MIDI substream starts AMDTP streams in domain. Usage of the value can resolve the above issue. This commit replaces the check with the substream count and the value for the size of PCM period. I note that DOT AMDTP protocol has a quirk to use different transmission method of IEC 61883-6 for tx/rx streams; non-blocking in tx stream and blocking in rx stream. Although the difference of transmission method between tx/rx streams precisely brings different timing for a certain amount of events due to their different calculation for data blocks per packet, it's possible to approximate enough amount of events mostly has the same timing. Actually current ALSA IEC 61883-1/6 engine uses large amount of data blocks for each hardware IRQ (=16 packets). Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191007110532.30270-15-o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
2019-10-07 19:05:29 +08:00
return err;
err = pcm_init_hw_params(dg00x, substream);
if (err < 0)
goto err_locked;
/* Check current clock source. */
err = snd_dg00x_stream_get_clock(dg00x, &clock);
if (err < 0)
goto err_locked;
if (clock != SND_DG00X_CLOCK_INTERNAL) {
err = snd_dg00x_stream_check_external_clock(dg00x, &detect);
if (err < 0)
goto err_locked;
if (!detect) {
err = -EBUSY;
goto err_locked;
}
}
ALSA: firewire-digi00x: use the same size of period for PCM substream in AMDTP streams In current implementation, when opening a PCM substream, it's needed to check whether the opposite PCM substream runs. This is to assign effectual constraints (e.g. sampling rate) to opened PCM substream. The number of PCM substreams and MIDI substreams on AMDTP streams in domain is recorded in own structure. Usage of this count is an alternative of the above check. This is better because the count is incremented in pcm.hw_params earlier than pcm.trigger. This idea has one issue because it's incremented for MIDI substreams as well. In current implementation, for a case that any MIDI substream run and a PCM substream is going to start, PCM application to start the PCM substream can decide hardware parameters by restart packet streaming. Just checking the substream count can brings regression. Now AMDTP domain structure has a member for the size of PCM period in PCM substream which starts AMDTP streams in domain. When the value has zero and the substream count is greater than 1, it means that any MIDI substream starts AMDTP streams in domain. Usage of the value can resolve the above issue. This commit replaces the check with the substream count and the value for the size of PCM period. I note that DOT AMDTP protocol has a quirk to use different transmission method of IEC 61883-6 for tx/rx streams; non-blocking in tx stream and blocking in rx stream. Although the difference of transmission method between tx/rx streams precisely brings different timing for a certain amount of events due to their different calculation for data blocks per packet, it's possible to approximate enough amount of events mostly has the same timing. Actually current ALSA IEC 61883-1/6 engine uses large amount of data blocks for each hardware IRQ (=16 packets). Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191007110532.30270-15-o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
2019-10-07 19:05:29 +08:00
mutex_lock(&dg00x->mutex);
// When source of clock is not internal or any stream is reserved for
// transmission of PCM frames, the available sampling rate is limited
// at current one.
if ((clock != SND_DG00X_CLOCK_INTERNAL) ||
ALSA: firewire-digi00x: use the same size of period for PCM substream in AMDTP streams In current implementation, when opening a PCM substream, it's needed to check whether the opposite PCM substream runs. This is to assign effectual constraints (e.g. sampling rate) to opened PCM substream. The number of PCM substreams and MIDI substreams on AMDTP streams in domain is recorded in own structure. Usage of this count is an alternative of the above check. This is better because the count is incremented in pcm.hw_params earlier than pcm.trigger. This idea has one issue because it's incremented for MIDI substreams as well. In current implementation, for a case that any MIDI substream run and a PCM substream is going to start, PCM application to start the PCM substream can decide hardware parameters by restart packet streaming. Just checking the substream count can brings regression. Now AMDTP domain structure has a member for the size of PCM period in PCM substream which starts AMDTP streams in domain. When the value has zero and the substream count is greater than 1, it means that any MIDI substream starts AMDTP streams in domain. Usage of the value can resolve the above issue. This commit replaces the check with the substream count and the value for the size of PCM period. I note that DOT AMDTP protocol has a quirk to use different transmission method of IEC 61883-6 for tx/rx streams; non-blocking in tx stream and blocking in rx stream. Although the difference of transmission method between tx/rx streams precisely brings different timing for a certain amount of events due to their different calculation for data blocks per packet, it's possible to approximate enough amount of events mostly has the same timing. Actually current ALSA IEC 61883-1/6 engine uses large amount of data blocks for each hardware IRQ (=16 packets). Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191007110532.30270-15-o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
2019-10-07 19:05:29 +08:00
(dg00x->substreams_counter > 0 && d->events_per_period > 0)) {
unsigned int frames_per_period = d->events_per_period;
unsigned int frames_per_buffer = d->events_per_buffer;
ALSA: firewire-digi00x: use the same size of period for PCM substream in AMDTP streams In current implementation, when opening a PCM substream, it's needed to check whether the opposite PCM substream runs. This is to assign effectual constraints (e.g. sampling rate) to opened PCM substream. The number of PCM substreams and MIDI substreams on AMDTP streams in domain is recorded in own structure. Usage of this count is an alternative of the above check. This is better because the count is incremented in pcm.hw_params earlier than pcm.trigger. This idea has one issue because it's incremented for MIDI substreams as well. In current implementation, for a case that any MIDI substream run and a PCM substream is going to start, PCM application to start the PCM substream can decide hardware parameters by restart packet streaming. Just checking the substream count can brings regression. Now AMDTP domain structure has a member for the size of PCM period in PCM substream which starts AMDTP streams in domain. When the value has zero and the substream count is greater than 1, it means that any MIDI substream starts AMDTP streams in domain. Usage of the value can resolve the above issue. This commit replaces the check with the substream count and the value for the size of PCM period. I note that DOT AMDTP protocol has a quirk to use different transmission method of IEC 61883-6 for tx/rx streams; non-blocking in tx stream and blocking in rx stream. Although the difference of transmission method between tx/rx streams precisely brings different timing for a certain amount of events due to their different calculation for data blocks per packet, it's possible to approximate enough amount of events mostly has the same timing. Actually current ALSA IEC 61883-1/6 engine uses large amount of data blocks for each hardware IRQ (=16 packets). Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191007110532.30270-15-o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
2019-10-07 19:05:29 +08:00
unsigned int rate;
err = snd_dg00x_stream_get_external_rate(dg00x, &rate);
ALSA: firewire-digi00x: use the same size of period for PCM substream in AMDTP streams In current implementation, when opening a PCM substream, it's needed to check whether the opposite PCM substream runs. This is to assign effectual constraints (e.g. sampling rate) to opened PCM substream. The number of PCM substreams and MIDI substreams on AMDTP streams in domain is recorded in own structure. Usage of this count is an alternative of the above check. This is better because the count is incremented in pcm.hw_params earlier than pcm.trigger. This idea has one issue because it's incremented for MIDI substreams as well. In current implementation, for a case that any MIDI substream run and a PCM substream is going to start, PCM application to start the PCM substream can decide hardware parameters by restart packet streaming. Just checking the substream count can brings regression. Now AMDTP domain structure has a member for the size of PCM period in PCM substream which starts AMDTP streams in domain. When the value has zero and the substream count is greater than 1, it means that any MIDI substream starts AMDTP streams in domain. Usage of the value can resolve the above issue. This commit replaces the check with the substream count and the value for the size of PCM period. I note that DOT AMDTP protocol has a quirk to use different transmission method of IEC 61883-6 for tx/rx streams; non-blocking in tx stream and blocking in rx stream. Although the difference of transmission method between tx/rx streams precisely brings different timing for a certain amount of events due to their different calculation for data blocks per packet, it's possible to approximate enough amount of events mostly has the same timing. Actually current ALSA IEC 61883-1/6 engine uses large amount of data blocks for each hardware IRQ (=16 packets). Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191007110532.30270-15-o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
2019-10-07 19:05:29 +08:00
if (err < 0) {
mutex_unlock(&dg00x->mutex);
goto err_locked;
ALSA: firewire-digi00x: use the same size of period for PCM substream in AMDTP streams In current implementation, when opening a PCM substream, it's needed to check whether the opposite PCM substream runs. This is to assign effectual constraints (e.g. sampling rate) to opened PCM substream. The number of PCM substreams and MIDI substreams on AMDTP streams in domain is recorded in own structure. Usage of this count is an alternative of the above check. This is better because the count is incremented in pcm.hw_params earlier than pcm.trigger. This idea has one issue because it's incremented for MIDI substreams as well. In current implementation, for a case that any MIDI substream run and a PCM substream is going to start, PCM application to start the PCM substream can decide hardware parameters by restart packet streaming. Just checking the substream count can brings regression. Now AMDTP domain structure has a member for the size of PCM period in PCM substream which starts AMDTP streams in domain. When the value has zero and the substream count is greater than 1, it means that any MIDI substream starts AMDTP streams in domain. Usage of the value can resolve the above issue. This commit replaces the check with the substream count and the value for the size of PCM period. I note that DOT AMDTP protocol has a quirk to use different transmission method of IEC 61883-6 for tx/rx streams; non-blocking in tx stream and blocking in rx stream. Although the difference of transmission method between tx/rx streams precisely brings different timing for a certain amount of events due to their different calculation for data blocks per packet, it's possible to approximate enough amount of events mostly has the same timing. Actually current ALSA IEC 61883-1/6 engine uses large amount of data blocks for each hardware IRQ (=16 packets). Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191007110532.30270-15-o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
2019-10-07 19:05:29 +08:00
}
substream->runtime->hw.rate_min = rate;
substream->runtime->hw.rate_max = rate;
ALSA: firewire-digi00x: use the same size of period for PCM substream in AMDTP streams In current implementation, when opening a PCM substream, it's needed to check whether the opposite PCM substream runs. This is to assign effectual constraints (e.g. sampling rate) to opened PCM substream. The number of PCM substreams and MIDI substreams on AMDTP streams in domain is recorded in own structure. Usage of this count is an alternative of the above check. This is better because the count is incremented in pcm.hw_params earlier than pcm.trigger. This idea has one issue because it's incremented for MIDI substreams as well. In current implementation, for a case that any MIDI substream run and a PCM substream is going to start, PCM application to start the PCM substream can decide hardware parameters by restart packet streaming. Just checking the substream count can brings regression. Now AMDTP domain structure has a member for the size of PCM period in PCM substream which starts AMDTP streams in domain. When the value has zero and the substream count is greater than 1, it means that any MIDI substream starts AMDTP streams in domain. Usage of the value can resolve the above issue. This commit replaces the check with the substream count and the value for the size of PCM period. I note that DOT AMDTP protocol has a quirk to use different transmission method of IEC 61883-6 for tx/rx streams; non-blocking in tx stream and blocking in rx stream. Although the difference of transmission method between tx/rx streams precisely brings different timing for a certain amount of events due to their different calculation for data blocks per packet, it's possible to approximate enough amount of events mostly has the same timing. Actually current ALSA IEC 61883-1/6 engine uses large amount of data blocks for each hardware IRQ (=16 packets). Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191007110532.30270-15-o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
2019-10-07 19:05:29 +08:00
if (frames_per_period > 0) {
err = snd_pcm_hw_constraint_minmax(substream->runtime,
SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_PERIOD_SIZE,
frames_per_period, frames_per_period);
if (err < 0) {
mutex_unlock(&dg00x->mutex);
goto err_locked;
}
err = snd_pcm_hw_constraint_minmax(substream->runtime,
SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_BUFFER_SIZE,
frames_per_buffer, frames_per_buffer);
if (err < 0) {
mutex_unlock(&dg00x->mutex);
goto err_locked;
}
ALSA: firewire-digi00x: use the same size of period for PCM substream in AMDTP streams In current implementation, when opening a PCM substream, it's needed to check whether the opposite PCM substream runs. This is to assign effectual constraints (e.g. sampling rate) to opened PCM substream. The number of PCM substreams and MIDI substreams on AMDTP streams in domain is recorded in own structure. Usage of this count is an alternative of the above check. This is better because the count is incremented in pcm.hw_params earlier than pcm.trigger. This idea has one issue because it's incremented for MIDI substreams as well. In current implementation, for a case that any MIDI substream run and a PCM substream is going to start, PCM application to start the PCM substream can decide hardware parameters by restart packet streaming. Just checking the substream count can brings regression. Now AMDTP domain structure has a member for the size of PCM period in PCM substream which starts AMDTP streams in domain. When the value has zero and the substream count is greater than 1, it means that any MIDI substream starts AMDTP streams in domain. Usage of the value can resolve the above issue. This commit replaces the check with the substream count and the value for the size of PCM period. I note that DOT AMDTP protocol has a quirk to use different transmission method of IEC 61883-6 for tx/rx streams; non-blocking in tx stream and blocking in rx stream. Although the difference of transmission method between tx/rx streams precisely brings different timing for a certain amount of events due to their different calculation for data blocks per packet, it's possible to approximate enough amount of events mostly has the same timing. Actually current ALSA IEC 61883-1/6 engine uses large amount of data blocks for each hardware IRQ (=16 packets). Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191007110532.30270-15-o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
2019-10-07 19:05:29 +08:00
}
}
ALSA: firewire-digi00x: use the same size of period for PCM substream in AMDTP streams In current implementation, when opening a PCM substream, it's needed to check whether the opposite PCM substream runs. This is to assign effectual constraints (e.g. sampling rate) to opened PCM substream. The number of PCM substreams and MIDI substreams on AMDTP streams in domain is recorded in own structure. Usage of this count is an alternative of the above check. This is better because the count is incremented in pcm.hw_params earlier than pcm.trigger. This idea has one issue because it's incremented for MIDI substreams as well. In current implementation, for a case that any MIDI substream run and a PCM substream is going to start, PCM application to start the PCM substream can decide hardware parameters by restart packet streaming. Just checking the substream count can brings regression. Now AMDTP domain structure has a member for the size of PCM period in PCM substream which starts AMDTP streams in domain. When the value has zero and the substream count is greater than 1, it means that any MIDI substream starts AMDTP streams in domain. Usage of the value can resolve the above issue. This commit replaces the check with the substream count and the value for the size of PCM period. I note that DOT AMDTP protocol has a quirk to use different transmission method of IEC 61883-6 for tx/rx streams; non-blocking in tx stream and blocking in rx stream. Although the difference of transmission method between tx/rx streams precisely brings different timing for a certain amount of events due to their different calculation for data blocks per packet, it's possible to approximate enough amount of events mostly has the same timing. Actually current ALSA IEC 61883-1/6 engine uses large amount of data blocks for each hardware IRQ (=16 packets). Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191007110532.30270-15-o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
2019-10-07 19:05:29 +08:00
mutex_unlock(&dg00x->mutex);
snd_pcm_set_sync(substream);
ALSA: firewire-digi00x: use the same size of period for PCM substream in AMDTP streams In current implementation, when opening a PCM substream, it's needed to check whether the opposite PCM substream runs. This is to assign effectual constraints (e.g. sampling rate) to opened PCM substream. The number of PCM substreams and MIDI substreams on AMDTP streams in domain is recorded in own structure. Usage of this count is an alternative of the above check. This is better because the count is incremented in pcm.hw_params earlier than pcm.trigger. This idea has one issue because it's incremented for MIDI substreams as well. In current implementation, for a case that any MIDI substream run and a PCM substream is going to start, PCM application to start the PCM substream can decide hardware parameters by restart packet streaming. Just checking the substream count can brings regression. Now AMDTP domain structure has a member for the size of PCM period in PCM substream which starts AMDTP streams in domain. When the value has zero and the substream count is greater than 1, it means that any MIDI substream starts AMDTP streams in domain. Usage of the value can resolve the above issue. This commit replaces the check with the substream count and the value for the size of PCM period. I note that DOT AMDTP protocol has a quirk to use different transmission method of IEC 61883-6 for tx/rx streams; non-blocking in tx stream and blocking in rx stream. Although the difference of transmission method between tx/rx streams precisely brings different timing for a certain amount of events due to their different calculation for data blocks per packet, it's possible to approximate enough amount of events mostly has the same timing. Actually current ALSA IEC 61883-1/6 engine uses large amount of data blocks for each hardware IRQ (=16 packets). Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191007110532.30270-15-o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
2019-10-07 19:05:29 +08:00
return 0;
err_locked:
snd_dg00x_stream_lock_release(dg00x);
return err;
}
static int pcm_close(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
{
struct snd_dg00x *dg00x = substream->private_data;
snd_dg00x_stream_lock_release(dg00x);
return 0;
}
static int pcm_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
struct snd_pcm_hw_params *hw_params)
{
struct snd_dg00x *dg00x = substream->private_data;
int err = 0;
if (substream->runtime->status->state == SNDRV_PCM_STATE_OPEN) {
unsigned int rate = params_rate(hw_params);
unsigned int frames_per_period = params_period_size(hw_params);
unsigned int frames_per_buffer = params_buffer_size(hw_params);
mutex_lock(&dg00x->mutex);
err = snd_dg00x_stream_reserve_duplex(dg00x, rate,
frames_per_period, frames_per_buffer);
if (err >= 0)
++dg00x->substreams_counter;
mutex_unlock(&dg00x->mutex);
}
return err;
}
static int pcm_hw_free(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
{
struct snd_dg00x *dg00x = substream->private_data;
mutex_lock(&dg00x->mutex);
if (substream->runtime->status->state != SNDRV_PCM_STATE_OPEN)
--dg00x->substreams_counter;
snd_dg00x_stream_stop_duplex(dg00x);
mutex_unlock(&dg00x->mutex);
return 0;
}
static int pcm_capture_prepare(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
{
struct snd_dg00x *dg00x = substream->private_data;
int err;
mutex_lock(&dg00x->mutex);
err = snd_dg00x_stream_start_duplex(dg00x);
if (err >= 0)
amdtp_stream_pcm_prepare(&dg00x->tx_stream);
mutex_unlock(&dg00x->mutex);
return err;
}
static int pcm_playback_prepare(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
{
struct snd_dg00x *dg00x = substream->private_data;
int err;
mutex_lock(&dg00x->mutex);
err = snd_dg00x_stream_start_duplex(dg00x);
if (err >= 0) {
amdtp_stream_pcm_prepare(&dg00x->rx_stream);
amdtp_dot_reset(&dg00x->rx_stream);
}
mutex_unlock(&dg00x->mutex);
return err;
}
static int pcm_capture_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd)
{
struct snd_dg00x *dg00x = substream->private_data;
switch (cmd) {
case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_START:
amdtp_stream_pcm_trigger(&dg00x->tx_stream, substream);
break;
case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_STOP:
amdtp_stream_pcm_trigger(&dg00x->tx_stream, NULL);
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
return 0;
}
static int pcm_playback_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd)
{
struct snd_dg00x *dg00x = substream->private_data;
switch (cmd) {
case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_START:
amdtp_stream_pcm_trigger(&dg00x->rx_stream, substream);
break;
case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_STOP:
amdtp_stream_pcm_trigger(&dg00x->rx_stream, NULL);
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
return 0;
}
static snd_pcm_uframes_t pcm_capture_pointer(struct snd_pcm_substream *sbstrm)
{
struct snd_dg00x *dg00x = sbstrm->private_data;
return amdtp_domain_stream_pcm_pointer(&dg00x->domain, &dg00x->tx_stream);
}
static snd_pcm_uframes_t pcm_playback_pointer(struct snd_pcm_substream *sbstrm)
{
struct snd_dg00x *dg00x = sbstrm->private_data;
return amdtp_domain_stream_pcm_pointer(&dg00x->domain, &dg00x->rx_stream);
}
2017-06-07 08:38:05 +08:00
static int pcm_capture_ack(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
{
struct snd_dg00x *dg00x = substream->private_data;
return amdtp_domain_stream_pcm_ack(&dg00x->domain, &dg00x->tx_stream);
2017-06-07 08:38:05 +08:00
}
static int pcm_playback_ack(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
{
struct snd_dg00x *dg00x = substream->private_data;
return amdtp_domain_stream_pcm_ack(&dg00x->domain, &dg00x->rx_stream);
2017-06-07 08:38:05 +08:00
}
int snd_dg00x_create_pcm_devices(struct snd_dg00x *dg00x)
{
static const struct snd_pcm_ops capture_ops = {
.open = pcm_open,
.close = pcm_close,
.hw_params = pcm_hw_params,
.hw_free = pcm_hw_free,
.prepare = pcm_capture_prepare,
.trigger = pcm_capture_trigger,
.pointer = pcm_capture_pointer,
2017-06-07 08:38:05 +08:00
.ack = pcm_capture_ack,
};
static const struct snd_pcm_ops playback_ops = {
.open = pcm_open,
.close = pcm_close,
.hw_params = pcm_hw_params,
.hw_free = pcm_hw_free,
.prepare = pcm_playback_prepare,
.trigger = pcm_playback_trigger,
.pointer = pcm_playback_pointer,
2017-06-07 08:38:05 +08:00
.ack = pcm_playback_ack,
};
struct snd_pcm *pcm;
int err;
err = snd_pcm_new(dg00x->card, dg00x->card->driver, 0, 1, 1, &pcm);
if (err < 0)
return err;
pcm->private_data = dg00x;
snprintf(pcm->name, sizeof(pcm->name),
"%s PCM", dg00x->card->shortname);
snd_pcm_set_ops(pcm, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK, &playback_ops);
snd_pcm_set_ops(pcm, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE, &capture_ops);
snd_pcm_set_managed_buffer_all(pcm, SNDRV_DMA_TYPE_VMALLOC, NULL, 0, 0);
return 0;
}