OpenCloudOS-Kernel/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-spi.c

85 lines
1.9 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 13 Based on 2 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at your option any later version this program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license for more details you should have received a copy of the gnu general public license along with this program if not see http www gnu org licenses this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at your option any later version this program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license for more details [based] [from] [clk] [highbank] [c] you should have received a copy of the gnu general public license along with this program if not see http www gnu org licenses extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-or-later has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 355 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Jilayne Lovejoy <opensource@jilayne.com> Reviewed-by: Steve Winslow <swinslow@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190519154041.837383322@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-05-19 21:51:43 +08:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
/*
* 3-axis accelerometer driver supporting SPI Bosch-Sensortec accelerometer chip
* Copyright © 2015 Pengutronix, Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de>
*/
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/regmap.h>
#include <linux/spi/spi.h>
#include "bmc150-accel.h"
static int bmc150_accel_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
{
struct regmap *regmap;
const char *name = NULL;
enum bmc150_type type = BOSCH_UNKNOWN;
const struct spi_device_id *id = spi_get_device_id(spi);
regmap = devm_regmap_init_spi(spi, &bmc150_regmap_conf);
if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
dev_err(&spi->dev, "Failed to initialize spi regmap\n");
return PTR_ERR(regmap);
}
if (id) {
name = id->name;
type = id->driver_data;
}
return bmc150_accel_core_probe(&spi->dev, regmap, spi->irq, type, name,
true);
}
static int bmc150_accel_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
{
return bmc150_accel_core_remove(&spi->dev);
}
static const struct acpi_device_id bmc150_accel_acpi_match[] = {
iio: accel: bmc150: Drop misleading/duplicate chip identifiers Commit 0ad4bf370176 ("iio:accel:bmc150-accel: Use the chip ID to detect sensor variant") stopped using the I2C/ACPI match data to look up the bmc150_accel_chip_info. However, the bmc150_accel_chip_info_tbl remained as-is, with multiple entries with the same chip_id (e.g. 0xFA for BMC150/BMI055/BMA255). This is redundant now because actually the driver will always select the first entry with a matching chip_id. So even if a device probes e.g. with BMA0255 it will end up using the chip_info for BMC150. And in general that's fine for now, the entries for BMC150/BMI055/BMA255 were exactly the same anyway (except for the name, which is replaced with the more accurate one later). But in this case it's misleading because it suggests that one should add even more entries with the same chip_id when adding support for new variants. Let's make that more clear by removing the enum with the chip identifiers entirely and instead have only one entry per chip_id. Note that we may need to bring back some mechanism to differentiate between different chips with the same chip_id in the future. For example, BMA250 (currently supported by the bma180 driver) has the same chip_id = 0x03 as BMA222 even though they have different channel sizes (8 bits vs 10 bits). But in any case, that mechanism would need to look quite different from what we have right now. Cc: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210611080903.14384-4-stephan@gerhold.net Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2021-06-11 16:08:56 +08:00
{"BMA0255"},
{"BMA0280"},
iio: accel: bmc150: Drop misleading/duplicate chip identifiers Commit 0ad4bf370176 ("iio:accel:bmc150-accel: Use the chip ID to detect sensor variant") stopped using the I2C/ACPI match data to look up the bmc150_accel_chip_info. However, the bmc150_accel_chip_info_tbl remained as-is, with multiple entries with the same chip_id (e.g. 0xFA for BMC150/BMI055/BMA255). This is redundant now because actually the driver will always select the first entry with a matching chip_id. So even if a device probes e.g. with BMA0255 it will end up using the chip_info for BMC150. And in general that's fine for now, the entries for BMC150/BMI055/BMA255 were exactly the same anyway (except for the name, which is replaced with the more accurate one later). But in this case it's misleading because it suggests that one should add even more entries with the same chip_id when adding support for new variants. Let's make that more clear by removing the enum with the chip identifiers entirely and instead have only one entry per chip_id. Note that we may need to bring back some mechanism to differentiate between different chips with the same chip_id in the future. For example, BMA250 (currently supported by the bma180 driver) has the same chip_id = 0x03 as BMA222 even though they have different channel sizes (8 bits vs 10 bits). But in any case, that mechanism would need to look quite different from what we have right now. Cc: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210611080903.14384-4-stephan@gerhold.net Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2021-06-11 16:08:56 +08:00
{"BMA222"},
{"BMA222E"},
{"BMA250E"},
{"BMC150A"},
{"BMI055A"},
{"BSBA0150"},
{ },
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, bmc150_accel_acpi_match);
static const struct spi_device_id bmc150_accel_id[] = {
iio: accel: bmc150: Drop misleading/duplicate chip identifiers Commit 0ad4bf370176 ("iio:accel:bmc150-accel: Use the chip ID to detect sensor variant") stopped using the I2C/ACPI match data to look up the bmc150_accel_chip_info. However, the bmc150_accel_chip_info_tbl remained as-is, with multiple entries with the same chip_id (e.g. 0xFA for BMC150/BMI055/BMA255). This is redundant now because actually the driver will always select the first entry with a matching chip_id. So even if a device probes e.g. with BMA0255 it will end up using the chip_info for BMC150. And in general that's fine for now, the entries for BMC150/BMI055/BMA255 were exactly the same anyway (except for the name, which is replaced with the more accurate one later). But in this case it's misleading because it suggests that one should add even more entries with the same chip_id when adding support for new variants. Let's make that more clear by removing the enum with the chip identifiers entirely and instead have only one entry per chip_id. Note that we may need to bring back some mechanism to differentiate between different chips with the same chip_id in the future. For example, BMA250 (currently supported by the bma180 driver) has the same chip_id = 0x03 as BMA222 even though they have different channel sizes (8 bits vs 10 bits). But in any case, that mechanism would need to look quite different from what we have right now. Cc: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210611080903.14384-4-stephan@gerhold.net Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2021-06-11 16:08:56 +08:00
{"bma222"},
{"bma222e"},
{"bma250e"},
{"bma253"},
{"bma255"},
iio: accel: bmc150: Drop misleading/duplicate chip identifiers Commit 0ad4bf370176 ("iio:accel:bmc150-accel: Use the chip ID to detect sensor variant") stopped using the I2C/ACPI match data to look up the bmc150_accel_chip_info. However, the bmc150_accel_chip_info_tbl remained as-is, with multiple entries with the same chip_id (e.g. 0xFA for BMC150/BMI055/BMA255). This is redundant now because actually the driver will always select the first entry with a matching chip_id. So even if a device probes e.g. with BMA0255 it will end up using the chip_info for BMC150. And in general that's fine for now, the entries for BMC150/BMI055/BMA255 were exactly the same anyway (except for the name, which is replaced with the more accurate one later). But in this case it's misleading because it suggests that one should add even more entries with the same chip_id when adding support for new variants. Let's make that more clear by removing the enum with the chip identifiers entirely and instead have only one entry per chip_id. Note that we may need to bring back some mechanism to differentiate between different chips with the same chip_id in the future. For example, BMA250 (currently supported by the bma180 driver) has the same chip_id = 0x03 as BMA222 even though they have different channel sizes (8 bits vs 10 bits). But in any case, that mechanism would need to look quite different from what we have right now. Cc: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210611080903.14384-4-stephan@gerhold.net Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
2021-06-11 16:08:56 +08:00
{"bma280"},
{"bmc150_accel"},
{"bmc156_accel", BOSCH_BMC156},
{"bmi055_accel"},
{}
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, bmc150_accel_id);
static struct spi_driver bmc150_accel_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "bmc150_accel_spi",
.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(bmc150_accel_acpi_match),
.pm = &bmc150_accel_pm_ops,
},
.probe = bmc150_accel_probe,
.remove = bmc150_accel_remove,
.id_table = bmc150_accel_id,
};
module_spi_driver(bmc150_accel_driver);
MODULE_AUTHOR("Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de>");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("BMC150 SPI accelerometer driver");