OpenCloudOS-Kernel/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c

267 lines
6.7 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Support KVM gust page tracking
*
* This feature allows us to track page access in guest. Currently, only
* write access is tracked.
*
* Copyright(C) 2015 Intel Corporation.
*
* Author:
* Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
*
* This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2. See
* the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
*/
#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
#include <linux/rculist.h>
#include <asm/kvm_host.h>
#include <asm/kvm_page_track.h>
#include "mmu.h"
void kvm_page_track_free_memslot(struct kvm_memory_slot *free,
struct kvm_memory_slot *dont)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < KVM_PAGE_TRACK_MAX; i++)
if (!dont || free->arch.gfn_track[i] !=
dont->arch.gfn_track[i]) {
kvfree(free->arch.gfn_track[i]);
free->arch.gfn_track[i] = NULL;
}
}
int kvm_page_track_create_memslot(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
unsigned long npages)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < KVM_PAGE_TRACK_MAX; i++) {
mm: introduce kv[mz]alloc helpers Patch series "kvmalloc", v5. There are many open coded kmalloc with vmalloc fallback instances in the tree. Most of them are not careful enough or simply do not care about the underlying semantic of the kmalloc/page allocator which means that a) some vmalloc fallbacks are basically unreachable because the kmalloc part will keep retrying until it succeeds b) the page allocator can invoke a really disruptive steps like the OOM killer to move forward which doesn't sound appropriate when we consider that the vmalloc fallback is available. As it can be seen implementing kvmalloc requires quite an intimate knowledge if the page allocator and the memory reclaim internals which strongly suggests that a helper should be implemented in the memory subsystem proper. Most callers, I could find, have been converted to use the helper instead. This is patch 6. There are some more relying on __GFP_REPEAT in the networking stack which I have converted as well and Eric Dumazet was not opposed [2] to convert them as well. [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170130094940.13546-1-mhocko@kernel.org [2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1485273626.16328.301.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com This patch (of 9): Using kmalloc with the vmalloc fallback for larger allocations is a common pattern in the kernel code. Yet we do not have any common helper for that and so users have invented their own helpers. Some of them are really creative when doing so. Let's just add kv[mz]alloc and make sure it is implemented properly. This implementation makes sure to not make a large memory pressure for > PAGE_SZE requests (__GFP_NORETRY) and also to not warn about allocation failures. This also rules out the OOM killer as the vmalloc is a more approapriate fallback than a disruptive user visible action. This patch also changes some existing users and removes helpers which are specific for them. In some cases this is not possible (e.g. ext4_kvmalloc, libcfs_kvzalloc) because those seems to be broken and require GFP_NO{FS,IO} context which is not vmalloc compatible in general (note that the page table allocation is GFP_KERNEL). Those need to be fixed separately. While we are at it, document that __vmalloc{_node} about unsupported gfp mask because there seems to be a lot of confusion out there. kvmalloc_node will warn about GFP_KERNEL incompatible (which are not superset) flags to catch new abusers. Existing ones would have to die slowly. [sfr@canb.auug.org.au: f2fs fixup] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170320163735.332e64b7@canb.auug.org.au Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170306103032.2540-2-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> [ext4 part] Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-05-09 06:57:09 +08:00
slot->arch.gfn_track[i] = kvzalloc(npages *
sizeof(*slot->arch.gfn_track[i]), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!slot->arch.gfn_track[i])
goto track_free;
}
return 0;
track_free:
kvm_page_track_free_memslot(slot, NULL);
return -ENOMEM;
}
static inline bool page_track_mode_is_valid(enum kvm_page_track_mode mode)
{
if (mode < 0 || mode >= KVM_PAGE_TRACK_MAX)
return false;
return true;
}
static void update_gfn_track(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
enum kvm_page_track_mode mode, short count)
{
int index, val;
index = gfn_to_index(gfn, slot->base_gfn, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL);
val = slot->arch.gfn_track[mode][index];
if (WARN_ON(val + count < 0 || val + count > USHRT_MAX))
return;
slot->arch.gfn_track[mode][index] += count;
}
/*
* add guest page to the tracking pool so that corresponding access on that
* page will be intercepted.
*
* It should be called under the protection both of mmu-lock and kvm->srcu
* or kvm->slots_lock.
*
* @kvm: the guest instance we are interested in.
* @slot: the @gfn belongs to.
* @gfn: the guest page.
* @mode: tracking mode, currently only write track is supported.
*/
void kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(struct kvm *kvm,
struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
enum kvm_page_track_mode mode)
{
if (WARN_ON(!page_track_mode_is_valid(mode)))
return;
update_gfn_track(slot, gfn, mode, 1);
/*
* new track stops large page mapping for the
* tracked page.
*/
kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage(slot, gfn);
if (mode == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE)
if (kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect(kvm, slot, gfn))
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_slot_page_track_add_page);
/*
* remove the guest page from the tracking pool which stops the interception
* of corresponding access on that page. It is the opposed operation of
* kvm_slot_page_track_add_page().
*
* It should be called under the protection both of mmu-lock and kvm->srcu
* or kvm->slots_lock.
*
* @kvm: the guest instance we are interested in.
* @slot: the @gfn belongs to.
* @gfn: the guest page.
* @mode: tracking mode, currently only write track is supported.
*/
void kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(struct kvm *kvm,
struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
enum kvm_page_track_mode mode)
{
if (WARN_ON(!page_track_mode_is_valid(mode)))
return;
update_gfn_track(slot, gfn, mode, -1);
/*
* allow large page mapping for the tracked page
* after the tracker is gone.
*/
kvm_mmu_gfn_allow_lpage(slot, gfn);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page);
/*
* check if the corresponding access on the specified guest page is tracked.
*/
bool kvm_page_track_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn,
enum kvm_page_track_mode mode)
{
struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
int index;
if (WARN_ON(!page_track_mode_is_valid(mode)))
return false;
slot = kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot(vcpu, gfn);
if (!slot)
return false;
index = gfn_to_index(gfn, slot->base_gfn, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL);
locking/atomics: COCCINELLE/treewide: Convert trivial ACCESS_ONCE() patterns to READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() Please do not apply this to mainline directly, instead please re-run the coccinelle script shown below and apply its output. For several reasons, it is desirable to use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() in preference to ACCESS_ONCE(), and new code is expected to use one of the former. So far, there's been no reason to change most existing uses of ACCESS_ONCE(), as these aren't harmful, and changing them results in churn. However, for some features, the read/write distinction is critical to correct operation. To distinguish these cases, separate read/write accessors must be used. This patch migrates (most) remaining ACCESS_ONCE() instances to {READ,WRITE}_ONCE(), using the following coccinelle script: ---- // Convert trivial ACCESS_ONCE() uses to equivalent READ_ONCE() and // WRITE_ONCE() // $ make coccicheck COCCI=/home/mark/once.cocci SPFLAGS="--include-headers" MODE=patch virtual patch @ depends on patch @ expression E1, E2; @@ - ACCESS_ONCE(E1) = E2 + WRITE_ONCE(E1, E2) @ depends on patch @ expression E; @@ - ACCESS_ONCE(E) + READ_ONCE(E) ---- Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: davem@davemloft.net Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au Cc: shuah@kernel.org Cc: snitzer@redhat.com Cc: thor.thayer@linux.intel.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1508792849-3115-19-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-10-24 05:07:29 +08:00
return !!READ_ONCE(slot->arch.gfn_track[mode][index]);
}
void kvm_page_track_cleanup(struct kvm *kvm)
{
struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
head = &kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
cleanup_srcu_struct(&head->track_srcu);
}
void kvm_page_track_init(struct kvm *kvm)
{
struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
head = &kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
init_srcu_struct(&head->track_srcu);
INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&head->track_notifier_list);
}
/*
* register the notifier so that event interception for the tracked guest
* pages can be received.
*/
void
kvm_page_track_register_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n)
{
struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
head = &kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
hlist_add_head_rcu(&n->node, &head->track_notifier_list);
spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_page_track_register_notifier);
/*
* stop receiving the event interception. It is the opposed operation of
* kvm_page_track_register_notifier().
*/
void
kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n)
{
struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
head = &kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
hlist_del_rcu(&n->node);
spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
synchronize_srcu(&head->track_srcu);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier);
/*
* Notify the node that write access is intercepted and write emulation is
* finished at this time.
*
* The node should figure out if the written page is the one that node is
* interested in by itself.
*/
void kvm_page_track_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, const u8 *new,
int bytes)
{
struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n;
int idx;
head = &vcpu->kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
if (hlist_empty(&head->track_notifier_list))
return;
idx = srcu_read_lock(&head->track_srcu);
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(n, &head->track_notifier_list, node)
if (n->track_write)
n->track_write(vcpu, gpa, new, bytes, n);
srcu_read_unlock(&head->track_srcu, idx);
}
/*
* Notify the node that memory slot is being removed or moved so that it can
* drop write-protection for the pages in the memory slot.
*
* The node should figure out it has any write-protected pages in this slot
* by itself.
*/
void kvm_page_track_flush_slot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
{
struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n;
int idx;
head = &kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
if (hlist_empty(&head->track_notifier_list))
return;
idx = srcu_read_lock(&head->track_srcu);
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(n, &head->track_notifier_list, node)
if (n->track_flush_slot)
n->track_flush_slot(kvm, slot, n);
srcu_read_unlock(&head->track_srcu, idx);
}