UbiquitousOS
/
OpenCloudOS-Kernel
mirror of https://gitee.com/OpenCloudOS/OpenCloudOS-Kernel.git
11
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
OpenCloudOS-Kernel/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da830.c

877 lines
32 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
/*
* TI DA830/OMAP L137 chip specific setup
*
* Author: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com>
*
* 2009 (c) MontaVista Software, Inc. This file is licensed under
* the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2. This program
* is licensed "as is" without any warranty of any kind, whether express
* or implied.
*/
ARM: davinci: da830: add new clock init using common clock framework This adds the new board-specific clock init in mach-davinci/da830.c using the new common clock framework drivers. The #ifdefs are needed to prevent compile errors until the entire ARCH_DAVINCI is converted. Also clean up the #includes since we are adding some here. Reviewed-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com> Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
2018-05-19 00:48:07 +08:00
#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
#include <linux/clk/davinci.h>
ARM: gpio: convert includes of mach/gpio.h and asm/gpio.h to linux/gpio.h Convert arch/arm includes of mach/gpio.h and asm/gpio.h to linux/gpio.h before we start consolidating the individual platform implementations of the gpio header files. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2011-07-26 17:53:52 +08:00
#include <linux/gpio.h>
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
#include <linux/init.h>
ARM: davinci: da8xx: support gpio platform device DaVinci GPIO driver now uses platform device model. Convert DA8XX SoC code to use the new model. Add da8xx_register_gpio() to create platform device for da8xx platforms. Signed-off-by: KV Sujith <sujithkv@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Philip Avinash <avinashphilip@ti.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> [nsekhar@ti.com: simplify commit message] Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
2013-08-18 13:18:59 +08:00
#include <linux/platform_data/gpio-davinci.h>
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
#include <asm/mach/map.h>
#include <mach/common.h>
ARM: davinci: da830: add new clock init using common clock framework This adds the new board-specific clock init in mach-davinci/da830.c using the new common clock framework drivers. The #ifdefs are needed to prevent compile errors until the entire ARCH_DAVINCI is converted. Also clean up the #includes since we are adding some here. Reviewed-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com> Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
2018-05-19 00:48:07 +08:00
#include <mach/cputype.h>
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
#include <mach/da8xx.h>
ARM: davinci: da830: add new clock init using common clock framework This adds the new board-specific clock init in mach-davinci/da830.c using the new common clock framework drivers. The #ifdefs are needed to prevent compile errors until the entire ARCH_DAVINCI is converted. Also clean up the #includes since we are adding some here. Reviewed-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com> Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
2018-05-19 00:48:07 +08:00
#include <mach/irqs.h>
#include <mach/time.h>
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
#include "mux.h"
/* Offsets of the 8 compare registers on the da830 */
#define DA830_CMP12_0 0x60
#define DA830_CMP12_1 0x64
#define DA830_CMP12_2 0x68
#define DA830_CMP12_3 0x6c
#define DA830_CMP12_4 0x70
#define DA830_CMP12_5 0x74
#define DA830_CMP12_6 0x78
#define DA830_CMP12_7 0x7c
#define DA830_REF_FREQ 24000000
/*
* Device specific mux setup
*
* soc description mux mode mode mux dbg
* reg offset mask mode
*/
static const struct mux_config da830_pins[] = {
#ifdef CONFIG_DAVINCI_MUX
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_14, 0, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, RTCK, 0, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_15, 0, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMU_0, 0, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_SDCKE, 0, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_CLK_GLUE, 0, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_CLK, 0, 12, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMB_CS_0, 0, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMB_CAS, 0, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMB_RAS, 0, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMB_WE, 0, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_BA_1, 1, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_BA_0, 1, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_A_0, 1, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_A_1, 1, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_A_2, 1, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_A_3, 1, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_A_4, 1, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_A_5, 1, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_0, 1, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_1, 1, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_2, 1, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_3, 1, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_4, 1, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_5, 1, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_6, 1, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_7, 1, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_A_6, 2, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_A_7, 2, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_A_8, 2, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_A_9, 2, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_A_10, 2, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_A_11, 2, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_A_12, 2, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_31, 2, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_8, 2, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_9, 2, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_10, 2, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_11, 2, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_12, 2, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_13, 2, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_13, 2, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_30, 3, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_29, 3, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_28, 3, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_27, 3, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_26, 3, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_25, 3, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_24, 3, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_23, 3, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_22, 4, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_21, 4, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_20, 4, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_19, 4, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_18, 4, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_17, 4, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_16, 4, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMB_WE_DQM_3, 4, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMB_WE_DQM_2, 5, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_0, 5, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_1, 5, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_2, 5, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_3, 5, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_4, 5, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_5, 5, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_6, 5, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_0, 5, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_1, 5, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_2, 5, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_3, 5, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_4, 5, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_5, 5, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_6, 5, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_7, 6, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_8, 6, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_9, 6, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_10, 6, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_11, 6, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_12, 6, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_13, 6, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_14, 6, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_7, 6, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_8, 6, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_9, 6, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_10, 6, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_11, 6, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_12, 6, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_13, 6, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_14, 6, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_15, 7, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMB_WE_DQM_1, 7, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMB_WE_DQM_0, 7, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, SPI0_SOMI_0, 7, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, SPI0_SIMO_0, 7, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, SPI0_CLK, 7, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NSPI0_ENA, 7, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NSPI0_SCS_0, 7, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EQEP0I, 7, 12, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EQEP0S, 7, 16, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EQEP1I, 7, 20, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NUART0_CTS, 7, 24, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NUART0_RTS, 7, 28, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EQEP0A, 7, 24, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EQEP0B, 7, 28, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_15, 7, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_14, 7, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_15, 7, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_0, 7, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_1, 7, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_2, 7, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_3, 7, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_4, 7, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, SPI1_SOMI_0, 8, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, SPI1_SIMO_0, 8, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, SPI1_CLK, 8, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UART0_RXD, 8, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UART0_TXD, 8, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR1_10, 8, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR1_11, 8, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NSPI1_ENA, 8, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, I2C1_SCL, 8, 0, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, I2C1_SDA, 8, 4, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EQEP1S, 8, 8, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, I2C0_SDA, 8, 12, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, I2C0_SCL, 8, 16, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UART2_RXD, 8, 28, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, TM64P0_IN12, 8, 12, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, TM64P0_OUT12, 8, 16, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_5, 8, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_6, 8, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_7, 8, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_8, 8, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_9, 8, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_10, 8, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_11, 8, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_12, 8, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NSPI1_SCS_0, 9, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, USB0_DRVVBUS, 9, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AHCLKX0, 9, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, ACLKX0, 9, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AFSX0, 9, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AHCLKR0, 9, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, ACLKR0, 9, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AFSR0, 9, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UART2_TXD, 9, 0, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AHCLKX2, 9, 8, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, ECAP0_APWM0, 9, 12, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, RMII_MHZ_50_CLK, 9, 20, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, ECAP1_APWM1, 9, 24, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, USB_REFCLKIN, 9, 8, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_13, 9, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_15, 9, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_11, 9, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_12, 9, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_13, 9, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_14, 9, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_15, 9, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_12, 9, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AMUTE0, 10, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_0, 10, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_1, 10, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_2, 10, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_3, 10, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_4, 10, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_5, 10, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_6, 10, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, RMII_TXD_0, 10, 4, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, RMII_TXD_1, 10, 8, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, RMII_TXEN, 10, 12, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, RMII_CRS_DV, 10, 16, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, RMII_RXD_0, 10, 20, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, RMII_RXD_1, 10, 24, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, RMII_RXER, 10, 28, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AFSR2, 10, 4, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, ACLKX2, 10, 8, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR2_3, 10, 12, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR2_2, 10, 16, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR2_1, 10, 20, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AFSX2, 10, 24, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, ACLKR2, 10, 28, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NRESETOUT, 10, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_0, 10, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_1, 10, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_2, 10, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_3, 10, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_4, 10, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_5, 10, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_6, 10, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_7, 11, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_8, 11, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UART1_RXD, 11, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UART1_TXD, 11, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_11, 11, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AHCLKX1, 11, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, ACLKX1, 11, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AFSX1, 11, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, MDIO_CLK, 11, 0, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, MDIO_D, 11, 4, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_9, 11, 8, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_10, 11, 12, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EPWM0B, 11, 20, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EPWM0A, 11, 24, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EPWMSYNCI, 11, 28, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR2_0, 11, 16, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EPWMSYNC0, 11, 28, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_7, 11, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_8, 11, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_9, 11, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_10, 11, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_11, 11, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_14, 11, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_15, 11, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_10, 11, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AHCLKR1, 12, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, ACLKR1, 12, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AFSR1, 12, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AMUTE1, 12, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR1_0, 12, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR1_1, 12, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR1_2, 12, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR1_3, 12, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, ECAP2_APWM2, 12, 4, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EHRPWMGLUETZ, 12, 12, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EQEP1A, 12, 28, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_11, 12, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_12, 12, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_13, 12, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_14, 12, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_0, 12, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_1, 12, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_2, 12, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_3, 12, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR1_4, 13, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR1_5, 13, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR1_6, 13, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR1_7, 13, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR1_8, 13, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR1_9, 13, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_0, 13, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_1, 13, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EQEP1B, 13, 0, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EPWM2B, 13, 4, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EPWM2A, 13, 8, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EPWM1B, 13, 12, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EPWM1A, 13, 16, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, MMCSD_DAT_0, 13, 24, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, MMCSD_DAT_1, 13, 28, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_0, 13, 24, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_1, 13, 28, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_4, 13, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_5, 13, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_6, 13, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_7, 13, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_8, 13, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_9, 13, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_0, 13, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_1, 13, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_2, 14, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_3, 14, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_4, 14, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_5, 14, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_6, 14, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_7, 14, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_8, 14, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_9, 14, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, MMCSD_DAT_2, 14, 0, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, MMCSD_DAT_3, 14, 4, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, MMCSD_DAT_4, 14, 8, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, MMCSD_DAT_5, 14, 12, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, MMCSD_DAT_6, 14, 16, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, MMCSD_DAT_7, 14, 20, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_8, 14, 24, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_9, 14, 28, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_2, 14, 0, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_3, 14, 4, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_4, 14, 8, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_5, 14, 12, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_6, 14, 16, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_7, 14, 20, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_8, 14, 24, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_9, 14, 28, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_2, 14, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_3, 14, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_4, 14, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_5, 14, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_6, 14, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_7, 14, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_8, 14, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_9, 14, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_10, 15, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_11, 15, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_12, 15, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_13, 15, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_14, 15, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_15, 15, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_A_0, 15, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_A_1, 15, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_10, 15, 0, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_11, 15, 4, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_12, 15, 8, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_13, 15, 12, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_14, 15, 16, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_15, 15, 20, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_7, 15, 24, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, MMCSD_CLK, 15, 28, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_10, 15, 0, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_11, 15, 4, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_12, 15, 8, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_13, 15, 12, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_14, 15, 16, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_15, 15, 20, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HCNTL0, 15, 28, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_10, 15, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_11, 15, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_12, 15, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_13, 15, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_14, 15, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_15, 15, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_0, 15, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_1, 15, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_A_2, 16, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_A_3, 16, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_A_4, 16, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_A_5, 16, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_A_6, 16, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_A_7, 16, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_A_8, 16, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_A_9, 16, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, MMCSD_CMD, 16, 0, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_6, 16, 4, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_3, 16, 8, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_2, 16, 12, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_1, 16, 16, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_0, 16, 20, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_PCLK, 16, 24, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_HSYNC, 16, 28, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HCNTL1, 16, 0, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_2, 16, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_3, 16, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_4, 16, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_5, 16, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_6, 16, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_7, 16, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_8, 16, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_9, 16, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_A_10, 17, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_A_11, 17, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_A_12, 17, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_BA_1, 17, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_BA_0, 17, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_CLK, 17, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_SDCKE, 17, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMA_CAS, 17, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_VSYNC, 17, 0, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NLCD_AC_ENB_CS, 17, 4, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_MCLK, 17, 8, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_5, 17, 12, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_4, 17, 16, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, OBSCLK, 17, 20, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMA_CS_4, 17, 28, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HHWIL, 17, 12, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AHCLKR2, 17, 20, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_10, 17, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_11, 17, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_12, 17, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_13, 17, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_14, 17, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_15, 17, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_0, 17, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_1, 17, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMA_RAS, 18, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMA_WE, 18, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMA_CS_0, 18, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMA_CS_2, 18, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMA_CS_3, 18, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMA_OE, 18, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMA_WE_DQM_1, 18, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMA_WE_DQM_0, 18, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMA_CS_5, 18, 0, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HRNW, 18, 4, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NUHPI_HAS, 18, 8, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NUHPI_HCS, 18, 12, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NUHPI_HDS1, 18, 20, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NUHPI_HDS2, 18, 24, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NUHPI_HINT, 18, 28, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_12, 18, 4, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AMUTE2, 18, 16, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_13, 18, 20, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_14, 18, 24, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_15, 18, 28, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_2, 18, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_3, 18, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_4, 18, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_5, 18, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_6, 18, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_7, 18, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_8, 18, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_9, 18, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_WAIT_0, 19, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NUHPI_HRDY, 19, 0, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_10, 19, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
#endif
};
sections: fix section conflicts in arch/arm/ Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-05 08:11:28 +08:00
const short da830_emif25_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_EMA_D_0, DA830_EMA_D_1, DA830_EMA_D_2, DA830_EMA_D_3,
DA830_EMA_D_4, DA830_EMA_D_5, DA830_EMA_D_6, DA830_EMA_D_7,
DA830_EMA_D_8, DA830_EMA_D_9, DA830_EMA_D_10, DA830_EMA_D_11,
DA830_EMA_D_12, DA830_EMA_D_13, DA830_EMA_D_14, DA830_EMA_D_15,
DA830_EMA_A_0, DA830_EMA_A_1, DA830_EMA_A_2, DA830_EMA_A_3,
DA830_EMA_A_4, DA830_EMA_A_5, DA830_EMA_A_6, DA830_EMA_A_7,
DA830_EMA_A_8, DA830_EMA_A_9, DA830_EMA_A_10, DA830_EMA_A_11,
DA830_EMA_A_12, DA830_EMA_BA_0, DA830_EMA_BA_1, DA830_EMA_CLK,
DA830_EMA_SDCKE, DA830_NEMA_CS_4, DA830_NEMA_CS_5, DA830_NEMA_WE,
DA830_NEMA_CS_0, DA830_NEMA_CS_2, DA830_NEMA_CS_3, DA830_NEMA_OE,
DA830_NEMA_WE_DQM_1, DA830_NEMA_WE_DQM_0, DA830_EMA_WAIT_0,
-1
};
sections: fix section conflicts in arch/arm/ Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-05 08:11:28 +08:00
const short da830_spi0_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_SPI0_SOMI_0, DA830_SPI0_SIMO_0, DA830_SPI0_CLK, DA830_NSPI0_ENA,
DA830_NSPI0_SCS_0,
-1
};
sections: fix section conflicts in arch/arm/ Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-05 08:11:28 +08:00
const short da830_spi1_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_SPI1_SOMI_0, DA830_SPI1_SIMO_0, DA830_SPI1_CLK, DA830_NSPI1_ENA,
DA830_NSPI1_SCS_0,
-1
};
sections: fix section conflicts in arch/arm/ Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-05 08:11:28 +08:00
const short da830_mmc_sd_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_MMCSD_DAT_0, DA830_MMCSD_DAT_1, DA830_MMCSD_DAT_2,
DA830_MMCSD_DAT_3, DA830_MMCSD_DAT_4, DA830_MMCSD_DAT_5,
DA830_MMCSD_DAT_6, DA830_MMCSD_DAT_7, DA830_MMCSD_CLK,
DA830_MMCSD_CMD,
-1
};
sections: fix section conflicts in arch/arm/ Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-05 08:11:28 +08:00
const short da830_uart0_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_NUART0_CTS, DA830_NUART0_RTS, DA830_UART0_RXD, DA830_UART0_TXD,
-1
};
sections: fix section conflicts in arch/arm/ Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-05 08:11:28 +08:00
const short da830_uart1_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_UART1_RXD, DA830_UART1_TXD,
-1
};
sections: fix section conflicts in arch/arm/ Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-05 08:11:28 +08:00
const short da830_uart2_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_UART2_RXD, DA830_UART2_TXD,
-1
};
sections: fix section conflicts in arch/arm/ Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-05 08:11:28 +08:00
const short da830_usb20_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_USB0_DRVVBUS, DA830_USB_REFCLKIN,
-1
};
sections: fix section conflicts in arch/arm/ Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-05 08:11:28 +08:00
const short da830_usb11_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_USB_REFCLKIN,
-1
};
sections: fix section conflicts in arch/arm/ Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-05 08:11:28 +08:00
const short da830_uhpi_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_UHPI_HD_0, DA830_UHPI_HD_1, DA830_UHPI_HD_2, DA830_UHPI_HD_3,
DA830_UHPI_HD_4, DA830_UHPI_HD_5, DA830_UHPI_HD_6, DA830_UHPI_HD_7,
DA830_UHPI_HD_8, DA830_UHPI_HD_9, DA830_UHPI_HD_10, DA830_UHPI_HD_11,
DA830_UHPI_HD_12, DA830_UHPI_HD_13, DA830_UHPI_HD_14, DA830_UHPI_HD_15,
DA830_UHPI_HCNTL0, DA830_UHPI_HCNTL1, DA830_UHPI_HHWIL, DA830_UHPI_HRNW,
DA830_NUHPI_HAS, DA830_NUHPI_HCS, DA830_NUHPI_HDS1, DA830_NUHPI_HDS2,
DA830_NUHPI_HINT, DA830_NUHPI_HRDY,
-1
};
sections: fix section conflicts in arch/arm/ Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-05 08:11:28 +08:00
const short da830_cpgmac_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_RMII_TXD_0, DA830_RMII_TXD_1, DA830_RMII_TXEN, DA830_RMII_CRS_DV,
DA830_RMII_RXD_0, DA830_RMII_RXD_1, DA830_RMII_RXER, DA830_MDIO_CLK,
DA830_MDIO_D,
-1
};
sections: fix section conflicts in arch/arm/ Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-05 08:11:28 +08:00
const short da830_emif3c_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_EMB_SDCKE, DA830_EMB_CLK_GLUE, DA830_EMB_CLK, DA830_NEMB_CS_0,
DA830_NEMB_CAS, DA830_NEMB_RAS, DA830_NEMB_WE, DA830_EMB_BA_1,
DA830_EMB_BA_0, DA830_EMB_A_0, DA830_EMB_A_1, DA830_EMB_A_2,
DA830_EMB_A_3, DA830_EMB_A_4, DA830_EMB_A_5, DA830_EMB_A_6,
DA830_EMB_A_7, DA830_EMB_A_8, DA830_EMB_A_9, DA830_EMB_A_10,
DA830_EMB_A_11, DA830_EMB_A_12, DA830_NEMB_WE_DQM_3,
DA830_NEMB_WE_DQM_2, DA830_EMB_D_0, DA830_EMB_D_1, DA830_EMB_D_2,
DA830_EMB_D_3, DA830_EMB_D_4, DA830_EMB_D_5, DA830_EMB_D_6,
DA830_EMB_D_7, DA830_EMB_D_8, DA830_EMB_D_9, DA830_EMB_D_10,
DA830_EMB_D_11, DA830_EMB_D_12, DA830_EMB_D_13, DA830_EMB_D_14,
DA830_EMB_D_15, DA830_EMB_D_16, DA830_EMB_D_17, DA830_EMB_D_18,
DA830_EMB_D_19, DA830_EMB_D_20, DA830_EMB_D_21, DA830_EMB_D_22,
DA830_EMB_D_23, DA830_EMB_D_24, DA830_EMB_D_25, DA830_EMB_D_26,
DA830_EMB_D_27, DA830_EMB_D_28, DA830_EMB_D_29, DA830_EMB_D_30,
DA830_EMB_D_31, DA830_NEMB_WE_DQM_1, DA830_NEMB_WE_DQM_0,
-1
};
sections: fix section conflicts in arch/arm/ Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-05 08:11:28 +08:00
const short da830_mcasp0_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_AHCLKX0, DA830_ACLKX0, DA830_AFSX0,
DA830_AHCLKR0, DA830_ACLKR0, DA830_AFSR0, DA830_AMUTE0,
DA830_AXR0_0, DA830_AXR0_1, DA830_AXR0_2, DA830_AXR0_3,
DA830_AXR0_4, DA830_AXR0_5, DA830_AXR0_6, DA830_AXR0_7,
DA830_AXR0_8, DA830_AXR0_9, DA830_AXR0_10, DA830_AXR0_11,
DA830_AXR0_12, DA830_AXR0_13, DA830_AXR0_14, DA830_AXR0_15,
-1
};
sections: fix section conflicts in arch/arm/ Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-05 08:11:28 +08:00
const short da830_mcasp1_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_AHCLKX1, DA830_ACLKX1, DA830_AFSX1,
DA830_AHCLKR1, DA830_ACLKR1, DA830_AFSR1, DA830_AMUTE1,
DA830_AXR1_0, DA830_AXR1_1, DA830_AXR1_2, DA830_AXR1_3,
DA830_AXR1_4, DA830_AXR1_5, DA830_AXR1_6, DA830_AXR1_7,
DA830_AXR1_8, DA830_AXR1_9, DA830_AXR1_10, DA830_AXR1_11,
-1
};
sections: fix section conflicts in arch/arm/ Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-05 08:11:28 +08:00
const short da830_mcasp2_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_AHCLKX2, DA830_ACLKX2, DA830_AFSX2,
DA830_AHCLKR2, DA830_ACLKR2, DA830_AFSR2, DA830_AMUTE2,
DA830_AXR2_0, DA830_AXR2_1, DA830_AXR2_2, DA830_AXR2_3,
-1
};
sections: fix section conflicts in arch/arm/ Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-05 08:11:28 +08:00
const short da830_i2c0_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_I2C0_SDA, DA830_I2C0_SCL,
-1
};
sections: fix section conflicts in arch/arm/ Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-05 08:11:28 +08:00
const short da830_i2c1_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_I2C1_SCL, DA830_I2C1_SDA,
-1
};
sections: fix section conflicts in arch/arm/ Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-05 08:11:28 +08:00
const short da830_lcdcntl_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_LCD_D_0, DA830_LCD_D_1, DA830_LCD_D_2, DA830_LCD_D_3,
DA830_LCD_D_4, DA830_LCD_D_5, DA830_LCD_D_6, DA830_LCD_D_7,
DA830_LCD_D_8, DA830_LCD_D_9, DA830_LCD_D_10, DA830_LCD_D_11,
DA830_LCD_D_12, DA830_LCD_D_13, DA830_LCD_D_14, DA830_LCD_D_15,
DA830_LCD_PCLK, DA830_LCD_HSYNC, DA830_LCD_VSYNC, DA830_NLCD_AC_ENB_CS,
DA830_LCD_MCLK,
-1
};
sections: fix section conflicts in arch/arm/ Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-05 08:11:28 +08:00
const short da830_pwm_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_ECAP0_APWM0, DA830_ECAP1_APWM1, DA830_EPWM0B, DA830_EPWM0A,
DA830_EPWMSYNCI, DA830_EPWMSYNC0, DA830_ECAP2_APWM2, DA830_EHRPWMGLUETZ,
DA830_EPWM2B, DA830_EPWM2A, DA830_EPWM1B, DA830_EPWM1A,
-1
};
sections: fix section conflicts in arch/arm/ Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-05 08:11:28 +08:00
const short da830_ecap0_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_ECAP0_APWM0,
-1
};
sections: fix section conflicts in arch/arm/ Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-05 08:11:28 +08:00
const short da830_ecap1_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_ECAP1_APWM1,
-1
};
sections: fix section conflicts in arch/arm/ Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-05 08:11:28 +08:00
const short da830_ecap2_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_ECAP2_APWM2,
-1
};
sections: fix section conflicts in arch/arm/ Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-05 08:11:28 +08:00
const short da830_eqep0_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_EQEP0I, DA830_EQEP0S, DA830_EQEP0A, DA830_EQEP0B,
-1
};
sections: fix section conflicts in arch/arm/ Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-05 08:11:28 +08:00
const short da830_eqep1_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_EQEP1I, DA830_EQEP1S, DA830_EQEP1A, DA830_EQEP1B,
-1
};
/* FIQ are pri 0-1; otherwise 2-7, with 7 lowest priority */
static u8 da830_default_priorities[DA830_N_CP_INTC_IRQ] = {
[IRQ_DA8XX_COMMTX] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_COMMRX] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_NINT] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT2] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT3] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT4] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT5] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT6] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT7] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_CCINT0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_CCERRINT] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_TCERRINT0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_AEMIFINT] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_I2CINT0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_MMCSDINT0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_MMCSDINT1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_ALLINT0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_RTC] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_SPINT0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_TINT12_0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_TINT34_0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_TINT12_1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_TINT34_1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_UARTINT0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_KEYMGRINT] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_MPUERR] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_CHIPINT0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_CHIPINT1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_CHIPINT2] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_CHIPINT3] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_TCERRINT1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_C0_RX_THRESH_PULSE] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_C0_RX_PULSE] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_C0_TX_PULSE] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_C0_MISC_PULSE] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_C1_RX_THRESH_PULSE] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_C1_RX_PULSE] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_C1_TX_PULSE] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_C1_MISC_PULSE] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_MEMERR] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_GPIO0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_GPIO1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_GPIO2] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_GPIO3] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_GPIO4] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_GPIO5] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_GPIO6] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_GPIO7] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_GPIO8] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_I2CINT1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_LCDINT] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_UARTINT1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_MCASPINT] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_ALLINT1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_SPINT1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_UHPI_INT1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_USB_INT] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_IRQN] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_RWAKEUP] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_UARTINT2] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_DFTSSINT] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_EHRPWM0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_EHRPWM0TZ] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_EHRPWM1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_EHRPWM1TZ] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_EHRPWM2] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_EHRPWM2TZ] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_ECAP0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_ECAP1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_ECAP2] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_EQEP0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_EQEP1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT0_0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT1_0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT2_0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT3_0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT4_0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT5_0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT6_0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT7_0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT0_1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT1_1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT2_1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT3_1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT4_1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT5_1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT6_1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT7_1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_ARMCLKSTOPREQ] = 7,
};
static struct map_desc da830_io_desc[] = {
{
.virtual = IO_VIRT,
.pfn = __phys_to_pfn(IO_PHYS),
.length = IO_SIZE,
.type = MT_DEVICE
},
{
.virtual = DA8XX_CP_INTC_VIRT,
.pfn = __phys_to_pfn(DA8XX_CP_INTC_BASE),
.length = DA8XX_CP_INTC_SIZE,
.type = MT_DEVICE
},
};
/* Contents of JTAG ID register used to identify exact cpu type */
static struct davinci_id da830_ids[] = {
{
.variant = 0x0,
.part_no = 0xb7df,
.manufacturer = 0x017, /* 0x02f >> 1 */
.cpu_id = DAVINCI_CPU_ID_DA830,
davinci: da830: add support for new silicon revisions Newer revs of da830 silicon have different 'variant' field of the JTAG id register. Current code only supports rev 1.0 silicon. This patch adds support for rev1.1 and rev2.0 silicon and updates the 'name' strings to add a '-' between 'omap' & 'l137' to have consistent naming with da850/omap-l138. From Mark Grosen <mgrosen@ti.com>: "There are currently three silicon revisions for OMAPL137. The JTAG IDs (DEVIDR register contents) for each silicon revision are shown below: 0x0B7D F02F for silicon revision 1.0 0x8B7D F02F for silicon revision 1.1 0x9B7D F02F for silicon revision 2.0 Corresponding errata documentation will be available in the next few weeks on the ti.com website." Reported-by: Nick Thompson <Nick.Thompson@gefanuc.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-09-30 02:09:21 +08:00
.name = "da830/omap-l137 rev1.0",
},
{
.variant = 0x8,
.part_no = 0xb7df,
.manufacturer = 0x017,
.cpu_id = DAVINCI_CPU_ID_DA830,
.name = "da830/omap-l137 rev1.1",
},
{
.variant = 0x9,
.part_no = 0xb7df,
.manufacturer = 0x017,
.cpu_id = DAVINCI_CPU_ID_DA830,
.name = "da830/omap-l137 rev2.0",
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
},
};
ARM: davinci: da8xx: support gpio platform device DaVinci GPIO driver now uses platform device model. Convert DA8XX SoC code to use the new model. Add da8xx_register_gpio() to create platform device for da8xx platforms. Signed-off-by: KV Sujith <sujithkv@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Philip Avinash <avinashphilip@ti.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> [nsekhar@ti.com: simplify commit message] Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
2013-08-18 13:18:59 +08:00
static struct davinci_gpio_platform_data da830_gpio_platform_data = {
ARM: davinci: da830: set the GPIO base to 0 Commit 587f7a694f01 ("gpio: davinci: Use dev name for label and automatic base selection") broke the GPIO support on DaVinci boards in legacy mode by allowing gpiolib to set the GPIO base automatically. DaVinci board files use the legacy GPIO API with hard-coded GPIO line numbers. Use the new fields in struct davinci_gpio_platform_data to manually set the GPIO base to 0. Fixes: 587f7a694f01 ("gpio: davinci: Use dev name for label and automatic base selection") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
2018-11-21 17:35:22 +08:00
.no_auto_base = true,
.base = 0,
.ngpio = 128,
ARM: davinci: da8xx: support gpio platform device DaVinci GPIO driver now uses platform device model. Convert DA8XX SoC code to use the new model. Add da8xx_register_gpio() to create platform device for da8xx platforms. Signed-off-by: KV Sujith <sujithkv@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Philip Avinash <avinashphilip@ti.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> [nsekhar@ti.com: simplify commit message] Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
2013-08-18 13:18:59 +08:00
};
int __init da830_register_gpio(void)
{
return da8xx_register_gpio(&da830_gpio_platform_data);
}
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
static struct davinci_timer_instance da830_timer_instance[2] = {
{
Davinci: timer - use ioremap() This patch eliminates IO_ADDRESS() usage for Davinci timer definitions. The timer code has correspondingly been modified to ioremap() MMRs instead. Signed-off-by: Cyril Chemparathy <cyril@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2010-05-08 05:06:35 +08:00
.base = DA8XX_TIMER64P0_BASE,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
.bottom_irq = IRQ_DA8XX_TINT12_0,
.top_irq = IRQ_DA8XX_TINT34_0,
.cmp_off = DA830_CMP12_0,
.cmp_irq = IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT0_0,
},
{
Davinci: timer - use ioremap() This patch eliminates IO_ADDRESS() usage for Davinci timer definitions. The timer code has correspondingly been modified to ioremap() MMRs instead. Signed-off-by: Cyril Chemparathy <cyril@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2010-05-08 05:06:35 +08:00
.base = DA8XX_TIMER64P1_BASE,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
.bottom_irq = IRQ_DA8XX_TINT12_1,
.top_irq = IRQ_DA8XX_TINT34_1,
.cmp_off = DA830_CMP12_0,
.cmp_irq = IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT0_1,
},
};
/*
* T0_BOT: Timer 0, bottom : Used for clock_event & clocksource
* T0_TOP: Timer 0, top : Used by DSP
* T1_BOT, T1_TOP: Timer 1, bottom & top: Used for watchdog timer
*/
static struct davinci_timer_info da830_timer_info = {
.timers = da830_timer_instance,
.clockevent_id = T0_BOT,
.clocksource_id = T0_BOT,
};
ARM: davinci: make davinci_soc_info structures const Make davinci_soc_info structures const as they are either passed to the function davinci_common_init having the argument as const or their field cpu_clks of type struct clk_lookup * is passed to the function davinci_clk_init. So, the fields are never modified and the structures can be const. Done using Coccinelle. Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@gmail.com> [nsekhar@ti.com: minor commit message adjustment] Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
2017-10-16 18:08:24 +08:00
static const struct davinci_soc_info davinci_soc_info_da830 = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
.io_desc = da830_io_desc,
.io_desc_num = ARRAY_SIZE(da830_io_desc),
Davinci: jtag_id - use ioremap() This patch replaces the jtag id base info in davinci_soc_info with a physical address which is then ioremap()ed within common code. This patch (in combination with a similar change for PSC) will allow us to eliminate the SYSCFG nastiness in DA8xx code. Signed-off-by: Cyril Chemparathy <cyril@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2010-05-08 05:06:34 +08:00
.jtag_id_reg = DA8XX_SYSCFG0_BASE + DA8XX_JTAG_ID_REG,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
.ids = da830_ids,
.ids_num = ARRAY_SIZE(da830_ids),
Davinci: pinmux - use ioremap() This patch modifies the pinmux implementation so as to ioremap() the pinmux register area on first use. Signed-off-by: Cyril Chemparathy <cyril@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2010-05-08 05:06:38 +08:00
.pinmux_base = DA8XX_SYSCFG0_BASE + 0x120,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
.pinmux_pins = da830_pins,
.pinmux_pins_num = ARRAY_SIZE(da830_pins),
Davinci: aintc/cpintc - use ioremap() This patch implements the following: - interrupt initialization uses ioremap() instead of passing a virtual address via davinci_soc_info. - machine definitions directly point to cp_intc_init() or davinci_irq_init() - davinci_intc_type and davinci_intc_base now get initialized in controller specific init functions instead of davinci_common_init() - minor fix in davinci_irq_init() to use intc_irq_num instead of DAVINCI_N_AINTC_IRQ Signed-off-by: Cyril Chemparathy <cyril@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2010-05-08 05:06:37 +08:00
.intc_base = DA8XX_CP_INTC_BASE,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
.intc_type = DAVINCI_INTC_TYPE_CP_INTC,
.intc_irq_prios = da830_default_priorities,
.intc_irq_num = DA830_N_CP_INTC_IRQ,
.timer_info = &da830_timer_info,
.emac_pdata = &da8xx_emac_pdata,
};
void __init da830_init(void)
{
davinci_common_init(&davinci_soc_info_da830);
Davinci: iotable based ioremap() interception This patch allows for a more flexible ioremap() interception based on iotable contents. With this patch, the ioremap() interception code can properly translate addresses only after davinci_soc_info has been initialized. Consequently, in soc-specific init functions, davinci_common_init() has to happen before any ioremap() attempts. The da8xx init sequence has been suitably modified to meet this restriction. Signed-off-by: Cyril Chemparathy <cyril@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2010-05-08 05:06:39 +08:00
da8xx_syscfg0_base = ioremap(DA8XX_SYSCFG0_BASE, SZ_4K);
WARN(!da8xx_syscfg0_base, "Unable to map syscfg0 module");
ARM: davinci: move davinci_clk_init() to init_time This moves the call of davinci_clk_init() from map_io to init_time for all boards. This is the proper place to init clocks. This is also done in preparation for moving to the common clock framework. dm646x is a special case because we need to handle different ref_clk rates depending on which board is being used. The clock init in this case is modified to set the rate before registering the clocks instead of using davinci_set_refclk_rate() to recalculate the entire clock tree after all of the clocks are registered. Also, the cpu_clks field is removed from struct davinci_soc_info since it is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com> Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
2018-01-20 11:20:22 +08:00
}
ARM: davinci: Move clock init after ioremap. Some clocks (such as the USB PHY clocks in DA8xx) will need to use iomem. The davinci_common_init() function must be called before the ioremap, so the clock init is now split out as separate function. Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com> Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
2016-04-15 03:13:35 +08:00
ARM: davinci: move davinci_clk_init() to init_time This moves the call of davinci_clk_init() from map_io to init_time for all boards. This is the proper place to init clocks. This is also done in preparation for moving to the common clock framework. dm646x is a special case because we need to handle different ref_clk rates depending on which board is being used. The clock init in this case is modified to set the rate before registering the clocks instead of using davinci_set_refclk_rate() to recalculate the entire clock tree after all of the clocks are registered. Also, the cpu_clks field is removed from struct davinci_soc_info since it is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com> Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
2018-01-20 11:20:22 +08:00
void __init da830_init_time(void)
{
ARM: davinci: da830: add new clock init using common clock framework This adds the new board-specific clock init in mach-davinci/da830.c using the new common clock framework drivers. The #ifdefs are needed to prevent compile errors until the entire ARCH_DAVINCI is converted. Also clean up the #includes since we are adding some here. Reviewed-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com> Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
2018-05-19 00:48:07 +08:00
void __iomem *pll;
struct clk *clk;
clk_register_fixed_rate(NULL, "ref_clk", NULL, 0, DA830_REF_FREQ);
pll = ioremap(DA8XX_PLL0_BASE, SZ_4K);
da830_pll_init(NULL, pll, NULL);
clk = clk_get(NULL, "timer0");
davinci_timer_init(clk);
}
static struct resource da830_psc0_resources[] = {
{
.start = DA8XX_PSC0_BASE,
.end = DA8XX_PSC0_BASE + SZ_4K - 1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
};
static struct platform_device da830_psc0_device = {
.name = "da830-psc0",
.id = -1,
.resource = da830_psc0_resources,
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(da830_psc0_resources),
};
static struct resource da830_psc1_resources[] = {
{
.start = DA8XX_PSC1_BASE,
.end = DA8XX_PSC1_BASE + SZ_4K - 1,
.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
},
};
static struct platform_device da830_psc1_device = {
.name = "da830-psc1",
.id = -1,
.resource = da830_psc1_resources,
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(da830_psc1_resources),
};
void __init da830_register_clocks(void)
{
/* PLL is registered in da830_init_time() */
platform_device_register(&da830_psc0_device);
platform_device_register(&da830_psc1_device);
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
}