License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.
By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.
Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.
This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.
How this work was done:
Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,
Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.
The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.
The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).
All documentation files were explicitly excluded.
The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.
- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.
For non */uapi/* files that summary was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139
and resulted in the first patch in this series.
If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930
and resulted in the second patch in this series.
- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1
and that resulted in the third patch in this series.
- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).
- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.
- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).
- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.
In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.
Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.
In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.
Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct
This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.
These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-11-01 22:07:57 +08:00
|
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* bcache journalling code, for btree insertions
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright 2012 Google, Inc.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "bcache.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "btree.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "debug.h"
|
2014-04-11 08:58:49 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "extents.h"
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-04-27 06:39:55 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <trace/events/bcache.h>
|
|
|
|
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Journal replay/recovery:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This code is all driven from run_cache_set(); we first read the journal
|
|
|
|
* entries, do some other stuff, then we mark all the keys in the journal
|
|
|
|
* entries (same as garbage collection would), then we replay them - reinserting
|
|
|
|
* them into the cache in precisely the same order as they appear in the
|
|
|
|
* journal.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* We only journal keys that go in leaf nodes, which simplifies things quite a
|
|
|
|
* bit.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-20 21:29:37 +08:00
|
|
|
static void journal_read_endio(struct bio *bio)
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct closure *cl = bio->bi_private;
|
|
|
|
closure_put(cl);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int journal_read_bucket(struct cache *ca, struct list_head *list,
|
2013-07-25 08:44:17 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned bucket_index)
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct journal_device *ja = &ca->journal;
|
|
|
|
struct bio *bio = &ja->bio;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct journal_replay *i;
|
|
|
|
struct jset *j, *data = ca->set->journal.w[0].data;
|
2013-07-25 08:44:17 +08:00
|
|
|
struct closure cl;
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned len, left, offset = 0;
|
|
|
|
int ret = 0;
|
|
|
|
sector_t bucket = bucket_to_sector(ca->set, ca->sb.d[bucket_index]);
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-25 08:44:17 +08:00
|
|
|
closure_init_stack(&cl);
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-06 05:04:06 +08:00
|
|
|
pr_debug("reading %u", bucket_index);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while (offset < ca->sb.bucket_size) {
|
|
|
|
reread: left = ca->sb.bucket_size - offset;
|
2013-08-06 05:04:06 +08:00
|
|
|
len = min_t(unsigned, left, PAGE_SECTORS << JSET_BITS);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bio_reset(bio);
|
2013-10-12 06:44:27 +08:00
|
|
|
bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = bucket + offset;
|
2017-08-24 01:10:32 +08:00
|
|
|
bio_set_dev(bio, ca->bdev);
|
2013-10-12 06:44:27 +08:00
|
|
|
bio->bi_iter.bi_size = len << 9;
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bio->bi_end_io = journal_read_endio;
|
2013-07-25 08:44:17 +08:00
|
|
|
bio->bi_private = &cl;
|
2016-06-06 03:32:05 +08:00
|
|
|
bio_set_op_attrs(bio, REQ_OP_READ, 0);
|
2013-03-29 02:50:55 +08:00
|
|
|
bch_bio_map(bio, data);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-11-24 15:11:25 +08:00
|
|
|
closure_bio_submit(bio, &cl);
|
2013-07-25 08:44:17 +08:00
|
|
|
closure_sync(&cl);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* This function could be simpler now since we no longer write
|
|
|
|
* journal entries that overlap bucket boundaries; this means
|
|
|
|
* the start of a bucket will always have a valid journal entry
|
|
|
|
* if it has any journal entries at all.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
j = data;
|
|
|
|
while (len) {
|
|
|
|
struct list_head *where;
|
|
|
|
size_t blocks, bytes = set_bytes(j);
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-06 05:04:06 +08:00
|
|
|
if (j->magic != jset_magic(&ca->sb)) {
|
|
|
|
pr_debug("%u: bad magic", bucket_index);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
return ret;
|
2013-08-06 05:04:06 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-08-06 05:04:06 +08:00
|
|
|
if (bytes > left << 9 ||
|
|
|
|
bytes > PAGE_SIZE << JSET_BITS) {
|
|
|
|
pr_info("%u: too big, %zu bytes, offset %u",
|
|
|
|
bucket_index, bytes, offset);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
return ret;
|
2013-08-06 05:04:06 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (bytes > len << 9)
|
|
|
|
goto reread;
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-06 05:04:06 +08:00
|
|
|
if (j->csum != csum_set(j)) {
|
|
|
|
pr_info("%u: bad csum, %zu bytes, offset %u",
|
|
|
|
bucket_index, bytes, offset);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
return ret;
|
2013-08-06 05:04:06 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-12-18 15:49:49 +08:00
|
|
|
blocks = set_blocks(j, block_bytes(ca->set));
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while (!list_empty(list)) {
|
|
|
|
i = list_first_entry(list,
|
|
|
|
struct journal_replay, list);
|
|
|
|
if (i->j.seq >= j->last_seq)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
list_del(&i->list);
|
|
|
|
kfree(i);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
list_for_each_entry_reverse(i, list, list) {
|
|
|
|
if (j->seq == i->j.seq)
|
|
|
|
goto next_set;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (j->seq < i->j.last_seq)
|
|
|
|
goto next_set;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (j->seq > i->j.seq) {
|
|
|
|
where = &i->list;
|
|
|
|
goto add;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where = list;
|
|
|
|
add:
|
|
|
|
i = kmalloc(offsetof(struct journal_replay, j) +
|
|
|
|
bytes, GFP_KERNEL);
|
|
|
|
if (!i)
|
|
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
memcpy(&i->j, j, bytes);
|
|
|
|
list_add(&i->list, where);
|
|
|
|
ret = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ja->seq[bucket_index] = j->seq;
|
|
|
|
next_set:
|
|
|
|
offset += blocks * ca->sb.block_size;
|
|
|
|
len -= blocks * ca->sb.block_size;
|
|
|
|
j = ((void *) j) + blocks * block_bytes(ca);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-25 08:44:17 +08:00
|
|
|
int bch_journal_read(struct cache_set *c, struct list_head *list)
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
#define read_bucket(b) \
|
|
|
|
({ \
|
2013-07-25 08:44:17 +08:00
|
|
|
int ret = journal_read_bucket(ca, list, b); \
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
__set_bit(b, bitmap); \
|
|
|
|
if (ret < 0) \
|
|
|
|
return ret; \
|
|
|
|
ret; \
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct cache *ca;
|
|
|
|
unsigned iter;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for_each_cache(ca, c, iter) {
|
|
|
|
struct journal_device *ja = &ca->journal;
|
2015-07-01 05:59:54 +08:00
|
|
|
DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, SB_JOURNAL_BUCKETS);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned i, l, r, m;
|
|
|
|
uint64_t seq;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitmap_zero(bitmap, SB_JOURNAL_BUCKETS);
|
|
|
|
pr_debug("%u journal buckets", ca->sb.njournal_buckets);
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-24 14:17:29 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Read journal buckets ordered by golden ratio hash to quickly
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
* find a sequence of buckets with valid journal entries
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < ca->sb.njournal_buckets; i++) {
|
bcache: add a comment in journal bucket reading
Journal bucket is a circular buffer, the bucket
can be like YYYNNNYY, which means the first valid journal in
the 7th bucket, and the latest valid journal in third bucket, in
this case, if we do not try we the zero index first, We
may get a valid journal in the 7th bucket, then we call
find_next_bit(bitmap,ca->sb.njournal_buckets, l + 1) to get the
first invalid bucket after the 7th bucket, because all these
buckets is valid, so no bit 1 in bitmap, thus find_next_bit()
function would return with ca->sb.njournal_buckets (8). So, after
that, bcache only read journal in 7th and 8the bucket,
the first to the third buckets are lost.
So, it is important to let developer know that, we need to try
the zero index at first in the hash-search, and avoid any breaks
in future's code modification.
[ML: Fixed whitespace & formatting & file permissions]
Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2017-11-25 07:14:24 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* We must try the index l with ZERO first for
|
|
|
|
* correctness due to the scenario that the journal
|
|
|
|
* bucket is circular buffer which might have wrapped
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
l = (i * 2654435769U) % ca->sb.njournal_buckets;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (test_bit(l, bitmap))
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (read_bucket(l))
|
|
|
|
goto bsearch;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-24 14:17:29 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* If that fails, check all the buckets we haven't checked
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
* already
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
pr_debug("falling back to linear search");
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-24 14:17:29 +08:00
|
|
|
for (l = find_first_zero_bit(bitmap, ca->sb.njournal_buckets);
|
|
|
|
l < ca->sb.njournal_buckets;
|
|
|
|
l = find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, ca->sb.njournal_buckets, l + 1))
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
if (read_bucket(l))
|
|
|
|
goto bsearch;
|
2013-09-24 14:17:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-06-03 06:39:44 +08:00
|
|
|
/* no journal entries on this device? */
|
|
|
|
if (l == ca->sb.njournal_buckets)
|
2013-09-24 14:17:29 +08:00
|
|
|
continue;
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
bsearch:
|
2014-06-03 06:39:44 +08:00
|
|
|
BUG_ON(list_empty(list));
|
|
|
|
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Binary search */
|
2014-04-11 07:09:51 +08:00
|
|
|
m = l;
|
|
|
|
r = find_next_bit(bitmap, ca->sb.njournal_buckets, l + 1);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
pr_debug("starting binary search, l %u r %u", l, r);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while (l + 1 < r) {
|
2013-07-12 13:42:14 +08:00
|
|
|
seq = list_entry(list->prev, struct journal_replay,
|
|
|
|
list)->j.seq;
|
|
|
|
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
m = (l + r) >> 1;
|
2013-07-12 13:42:14 +08:00
|
|
|
read_bucket(m);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-12 13:42:14 +08:00
|
|
|
if (seq != list_entry(list->prev, struct journal_replay,
|
|
|
|
list)->j.seq)
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
l = m;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
r = m;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-24 14:17:29 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Read buckets in reverse order until we stop finding more
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
* journal entries
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2013-09-24 14:17:29 +08:00
|
|
|
pr_debug("finishing up: m %u njournal_buckets %u",
|
|
|
|
m, ca->sb.njournal_buckets);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
l = m;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while (1) {
|
|
|
|
if (!l--)
|
|
|
|
l = ca->sb.njournal_buckets - 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (l == m)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (test_bit(l, bitmap))
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!read_bucket(l))
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
seq = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < ca->sb.njournal_buckets; i++)
|
|
|
|
if (ja->seq[i] > seq) {
|
|
|
|
seq = ja->seq[i];
|
2014-03-14 04:44:21 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* When journal_reclaim() goes to allocate for
|
|
|
|
* the first time, it'll use the bucket after
|
|
|
|
* ja->cur_idx
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
ja->cur_idx = i;
|
|
|
|
ja->last_idx = ja->discard_idx = (i + 1) %
|
|
|
|
ca->sb.njournal_buckets;
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-24 14:17:29 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!list_empty(list))
|
|
|
|
c->journal.seq = list_entry(list->prev,
|
|
|
|
struct journal_replay,
|
|
|
|
list)->j.seq;
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
#undef read_bucket
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void bch_journal_mark(struct cache_set *c, struct list_head *list)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
atomic_t p = { 0 };
|
|
|
|
struct bkey *k;
|
|
|
|
struct journal_replay *i;
|
|
|
|
struct journal *j = &c->journal;
|
|
|
|
uint64_t last = j->seq;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* journal.pin should never fill up - we never write a journal
|
|
|
|
* entry when it would fill up. But if for some reason it does, we
|
|
|
|
* iterate over the list in reverse order so that we can just skip that
|
|
|
|
* refcount instead of bugging.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
list_for_each_entry_reverse(i, list, list) {
|
|
|
|
BUG_ON(last < i->j.seq);
|
|
|
|
i->pin = NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while (last-- != i->j.seq)
|
|
|
|
if (fifo_free(&j->pin) > 1) {
|
|
|
|
fifo_push_front(&j->pin, p);
|
|
|
|
atomic_set(&fifo_front(&j->pin), 0);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (fifo_free(&j->pin) > 1) {
|
|
|
|
fifo_push_front(&j->pin, p);
|
|
|
|
i->pin = &fifo_front(&j->pin);
|
|
|
|
atomic_set(i->pin, 1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (k = i->j.start;
|
2013-12-18 13:56:21 +08:00
|
|
|
k < bset_bkey_last(&i->j);
|
2014-04-11 08:58:49 +08:00
|
|
|
k = bkey_next(k))
|
|
|
|
if (!__bch_extent_invalid(c, k)) {
|
|
|
|
unsigned j;
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-04-11 08:58:49 +08:00
|
|
|
for (j = 0; j < KEY_PTRS(k); j++)
|
|
|
|
if (ptr_available(c, k, j))
|
|
|
|
atomic_inc(&PTR_BUCKET(c, k, j)->pin);
|
2014-02-25 11:55:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-04-11 08:58:49 +08:00
|
|
|
bch_initial_mark_key(c, 0, k);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-25 08:44:17 +08:00
|
|
|
int bch_journal_replay(struct cache_set *s, struct list_head *list)
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int ret = 0, keys = 0, entries = 0;
|
|
|
|
struct bkey *k;
|
|
|
|
struct journal_replay *i =
|
|
|
|
list_entry(list->prev, struct journal_replay, list);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
uint64_t start = i->j.last_seq, end = i->j.seq, n = start;
|
2013-07-25 08:26:51 +08:00
|
|
|
struct keylist keylist;
|
|
|
|
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
list_for_each_entry(i, list, list) {
|
|
|
|
BUG_ON(i->pin && atomic_read(i->pin) != 1);
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-12 10:42:51 +08:00
|
|
|
cache_set_err_on(n != i->j.seq, s,
|
|
|
|
"bcache: journal entries %llu-%llu missing! (replaying %llu-%llu)",
|
|
|
|
n, i->j.seq - 1, start, end);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (k = i->j.start;
|
2013-12-18 13:56:21 +08:00
|
|
|
k < bset_bkey_last(&i->j);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
k = bkey_next(k)) {
|
2013-04-27 06:39:55 +08:00
|
|
|
trace_bcache_journal_replay_key(k);
|
|
|
|
|
2014-01-09 13:22:02 +08:00
|
|
|
bch_keylist_init_single(&keylist, k);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-25 09:07:22 +08:00
|
|
|
ret = bch_btree_insert(s, &keylist, i->pin, NULL);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
|
|
goto err;
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-25 08:26:51 +08:00
|
|
|
BUG_ON(!bch_keylist_empty(&keylist));
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
keys++;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cond_resched();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (i->pin)
|
|
|
|
atomic_dec(i->pin);
|
|
|
|
n = i->j.seq + 1;
|
|
|
|
entries++;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pr_info("journal replay done, %i keys in %i entries, seq %llu",
|
|
|
|
keys, entries, end);
|
2013-07-25 09:04:18 +08:00
|
|
|
err:
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
while (!list_empty(list)) {
|
|
|
|
i = list_first_entry(list, struct journal_replay, list);
|
|
|
|
list_del(&i->list);
|
|
|
|
kfree(i);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-07-25 09:04:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Journalling */
|
bcache: fix high CPU occupancy during journal
After long time small writing I/O running, we found the occupancy of CPU
is very high and I/O performance has been reduced by about half:
[root@ceph151 internal]# top
top - 15:51:05 up 1 day,2:43, 4 users, load average: 16.89, 15.15, 16.53
Tasks: 2063 total, 4 running, 2059 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu(s):4.3 us, 17.1 sy 0.0 ni, 66.1 id, 12.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.5 si, 0.0 st
KiB Mem : 65450044 total, 24586420 free, 38909008 used, 1954616 buff/cache
KiB Swap: 65667068 total, 65667068 free, 0 used. 25136812 avail Mem
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
2023 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 55.1 0.0 0:04.42 kworker/11:191
14126 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 42.9 0.0 0:08.72 kworker/10:3
9292 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 30.4 0.0 1:10.99 kworker/6:1
8553 ceph 20 0 4242492 1.805g 18804 S 30.0 2.9 410:07.04 ceph-osd
12287 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 26.7 0.0 0:28.13 kworker/7:85
31019 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 26.1 0.0 1:30.79 kworker/22:1
1787 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 25.7 0.0 5:18.45 kworker/8:7
32169 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 14.5 0.0 1:01.92 kworker/23:1
21476 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 13.9 0.0 0:05.09 kworker/1:54
2204 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 12.5 0.0 1:25.17 kworker/9:10
16994 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 12.2 0.0 0:06.27 kworker/5:106
15714 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 10.9 0.0 0:01.85 kworker/19:2
9661 ceph 20 0 4246876 1.731g 18800 S 10.6 2.8 403:00.80 ceph-osd
11460 ceph 20 0 4164692 2.206g 18876 S 10.6 3.5 360:27.19 ceph-osd
9960 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 10.2 0.0 0:02.75 kworker/2:139
11699 ceph 20 0 4169244 1.920g 18920 S 10.2 3.1 355:23.67 ceph-osd
6843 ceph 20 0 4197632 1.810g 18900 S 9.6 2.9 380:08.30 ceph-osd
The kernel work consumed a lot of CPU, and I found they are running journal
work, The journal is reclaiming source and flush btree node with surprising
frequency.
Through further analysis, we found that in btree_flush_write(), we try to
get a btree node with the smallest fifo idex to flush by traverse all the
btree nodein c->bucket_hash, after we getting it, since no locker protects
it, this btree node may have been written to cache device by other works,
and if this occurred, we retry to traverse in c->bucket_hash and get
another btree node. When the problem occurrd, the retry times is very high,
and we consume a lot of CPU in looking for a appropriate btree node.
In this patch, we try to record 128 btree nodes with the smallest fifo idex
in heap, and pop one by one when we need to flush btree node. It greatly
reduces the time for the loop to find the appropriate BTREE node, and also
reduce the occupancy of CPU.
[note by mpl: this triggers a checkpatch error because of adjacent,
pre-existing style violations]
Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-02-08 03:41:40 +08:00
|
|
|
#define journal_max_cmp(l, r) \
|
|
|
|
(fifo_idx(&c->journal.pin, btree_current_write(l)->journal) < \
|
|
|
|
fifo_idx(&(c)->journal.pin, btree_current_write(r)->journal))
|
|
|
|
#define journal_min_cmp(l, r) \
|
|
|
|
(fifo_idx(&c->journal.pin, btree_current_write(l)->journal) > \
|
|
|
|
fifo_idx(&(c)->journal.pin, btree_current_write(r)->journal))
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void btree_flush_write(struct cache_set *c)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Try to find the btree node with that references the oldest journal
|
|
|
|
* entry, best is our current candidate and is locked if non NULL:
|
|
|
|
*/
|
bcache: fix high CPU occupancy during journal
After long time small writing I/O running, we found the occupancy of CPU
is very high and I/O performance has been reduced by about half:
[root@ceph151 internal]# top
top - 15:51:05 up 1 day,2:43, 4 users, load average: 16.89, 15.15, 16.53
Tasks: 2063 total, 4 running, 2059 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu(s):4.3 us, 17.1 sy 0.0 ni, 66.1 id, 12.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.5 si, 0.0 st
KiB Mem : 65450044 total, 24586420 free, 38909008 used, 1954616 buff/cache
KiB Swap: 65667068 total, 65667068 free, 0 used. 25136812 avail Mem
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
2023 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 55.1 0.0 0:04.42 kworker/11:191
14126 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 42.9 0.0 0:08.72 kworker/10:3
9292 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 30.4 0.0 1:10.99 kworker/6:1
8553 ceph 20 0 4242492 1.805g 18804 S 30.0 2.9 410:07.04 ceph-osd
12287 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 26.7 0.0 0:28.13 kworker/7:85
31019 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 26.1 0.0 1:30.79 kworker/22:1
1787 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 25.7 0.0 5:18.45 kworker/8:7
32169 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 14.5 0.0 1:01.92 kworker/23:1
21476 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 13.9 0.0 0:05.09 kworker/1:54
2204 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 12.5 0.0 1:25.17 kworker/9:10
16994 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 12.2 0.0 0:06.27 kworker/5:106
15714 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 10.9 0.0 0:01.85 kworker/19:2
9661 ceph 20 0 4246876 1.731g 18800 S 10.6 2.8 403:00.80 ceph-osd
11460 ceph 20 0 4164692 2.206g 18876 S 10.6 3.5 360:27.19 ceph-osd
9960 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 10.2 0.0 0:02.75 kworker/2:139
11699 ceph 20 0 4169244 1.920g 18920 S 10.2 3.1 355:23.67 ceph-osd
6843 ceph 20 0 4197632 1.810g 18900 S 9.6 2.9 380:08.30 ceph-osd
The kernel work consumed a lot of CPU, and I found they are running journal
work, The journal is reclaiming source and flush btree node with surprising
frequency.
Through further analysis, we found that in btree_flush_write(), we try to
get a btree node with the smallest fifo idex to flush by traverse all the
btree nodein c->bucket_hash, after we getting it, since no locker protects
it, this btree node may have been written to cache device by other works,
and if this occurred, we retry to traverse in c->bucket_hash and get
another btree node. When the problem occurrd, the retry times is very high,
and we consume a lot of CPU in looking for a appropriate btree node.
In this patch, we try to record 128 btree nodes with the smallest fifo idex
in heap, and pop one by one when we need to flush btree node. It greatly
reduces the time for the loop to find the appropriate BTREE node, and also
reduce the occupancy of CPU.
[note by mpl: this triggers a checkpatch error because of adjacent,
pre-existing style violations]
Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-02-08 03:41:40 +08:00
|
|
|
struct btree *b;
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
2018-02-08 03:41:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
atomic_long_inc(&c->flush_write);
|
bcache: fix high CPU occupancy during journal
After long time small writing I/O running, we found the occupancy of CPU
is very high and I/O performance has been reduced by about half:
[root@ceph151 internal]# top
top - 15:51:05 up 1 day,2:43, 4 users, load average: 16.89, 15.15, 16.53
Tasks: 2063 total, 4 running, 2059 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu(s):4.3 us, 17.1 sy 0.0 ni, 66.1 id, 12.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.5 si, 0.0 st
KiB Mem : 65450044 total, 24586420 free, 38909008 used, 1954616 buff/cache
KiB Swap: 65667068 total, 65667068 free, 0 used. 25136812 avail Mem
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
2023 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 55.1 0.0 0:04.42 kworker/11:191
14126 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 42.9 0.0 0:08.72 kworker/10:3
9292 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 30.4 0.0 1:10.99 kworker/6:1
8553 ceph 20 0 4242492 1.805g 18804 S 30.0 2.9 410:07.04 ceph-osd
12287 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 26.7 0.0 0:28.13 kworker/7:85
31019 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 26.1 0.0 1:30.79 kworker/22:1
1787 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 25.7 0.0 5:18.45 kworker/8:7
32169 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 14.5 0.0 1:01.92 kworker/23:1
21476 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 13.9 0.0 0:05.09 kworker/1:54
2204 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 12.5 0.0 1:25.17 kworker/9:10
16994 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 12.2 0.0 0:06.27 kworker/5:106
15714 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 10.9 0.0 0:01.85 kworker/19:2
9661 ceph 20 0 4246876 1.731g 18800 S 10.6 2.8 403:00.80 ceph-osd
11460 ceph 20 0 4164692 2.206g 18876 S 10.6 3.5 360:27.19 ceph-osd
9960 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 10.2 0.0 0:02.75 kworker/2:139
11699 ceph 20 0 4169244 1.920g 18920 S 10.2 3.1 355:23.67 ceph-osd
6843 ceph 20 0 4197632 1.810g 18900 S 9.6 2.9 380:08.30 ceph-osd
The kernel work consumed a lot of CPU, and I found they are running journal
work, The journal is reclaiming source and flush btree node with surprising
frequency.
Through further analysis, we found that in btree_flush_write(), we try to
get a btree node with the smallest fifo idex to flush by traverse all the
btree nodein c->bucket_hash, after we getting it, since no locker protects
it, this btree node may have been written to cache device by other works,
and if this occurred, we retry to traverse in c->bucket_hash and get
another btree node. When the problem occurrd, the retry times is very high,
and we consume a lot of CPU in looking for a appropriate btree node.
In this patch, we try to record 128 btree nodes with the smallest fifo idex
in heap, and pop one by one when we need to flush btree node. It greatly
reduces the time for the loop to find the appropriate BTREE node, and also
reduce the occupancy of CPU.
[note by mpl: this triggers a checkpatch error because of adjacent,
pre-existing style violations]
Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-02-08 03:41:40 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
retry:
|
bcache: fix high CPU occupancy during journal
After long time small writing I/O running, we found the occupancy of CPU
is very high and I/O performance has been reduced by about half:
[root@ceph151 internal]# top
top - 15:51:05 up 1 day,2:43, 4 users, load average: 16.89, 15.15, 16.53
Tasks: 2063 total, 4 running, 2059 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu(s):4.3 us, 17.1 sy 0.0 ni, 66.1 id, 12.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.5 si, 0.0 st
KiB Mem : 65450044 total, 24586420 free, 38909008 used, 1954616 buff/cache
KiB Swap: 65667068 total, 65667068 free, 0 used. 25136812 avail Mem
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
2023 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 55.1 0.0 0:04.42 kworker/11:191
14126 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 42.9 0.0 0:08.72 kworker/10:3
9292 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 30.4 0.0 1:10.99 kworker/6:1
8553 ceph 20 0 4242492 1.805g 18804 S 30.0 2.9 410:07.04 ceph-osd
12287 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 26.7 0.0 0:28.13 kworker/7:85
31019 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 26.1 0.0 1:30.79 kworker/22:1
1787 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 25.7 0.0 5:18.45 kworker/8:7
32169 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 14.5 0.0 1:01.92 kworker/23:1
21476 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 13.9 0.0 0:05.09 kworker/1:54
2204 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 12.5 0.0 1:25.17 kworker/9:10
16994 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 12.2 0.0 0:06.27 kworker/5:106
15714 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 10.9 0.0 0:01.85 kworker/19:2
9661 ceph 20 0 4246876 1.731g 18800 S 10.6 2.8 403:00.80 ceph-osd
11460 ceph 20 0 4164692 2.206g 18876 S 10.6 3.5 360:27.19 ceph-osd
9960 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 10.2 0.0 0:02.75 kworker/2:139
11699 ceph 20 0 4169244 1.920g 18920 S 10.2 3.1 355:23.67 ceph-osd
6843 ceph 20 0 4197632 1.810g 18900 S 9.6 2.9 380:08.30 ceph-osd
The kernel work consumed a lot of CPU, and I found they are running journal
work, The journal is reclaiming source and flush btree node with surprising
frequency.
Through further analysis, we found that in btree_flush_write(), we try to
get a btree node with the smallest fifo idex to flush by traverse all the
btree nodein c->bucket_hash, after we getting it, since no locker protects
it, this btree node may have been written to cache device by other works,
and if this occurred, we retry to traverse in c->bucket_hash and get
another btree node. When the problem occurrd, the retry times is very high,
and we consume a lot of CPU in looking for a appropriate btree node.
In this patch, we try to record 128 btree nodes with the smallest fifo idex
in heap, and pop one by one when we need to flush btree node. It greatly
reduces the time for the loop to find the appropriate BTREE node, and also
reduce the occupancy of CPU.
[note by mpl: this triggers a checkpatch error because of adjacent,
pre-existing style violations]
Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-02-08 03:41:40 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&c->journal.lock);
|
|
|
|
if (heap_empty(&c->flush_btree)) {
|
|
|
|
for_each_cached_btree(b, c, i)
|
|
|
|
if (btree_current_write(b)->journal) {
|
|
|
|
if (!heap_full(&c->flush_btree))
|
|
|
|
heap_add(&c->flush_btree, b,
|
|
|
|
journal_max_cmp);
|
|
|
|
else if (journal_max_cmp(b,
|
|
|
|
heap_peek(&c->flush_btree))) {
|
|
|
|
c->flush_btree.data[0] = b;
|
|
|
|
heap_sift(&c->flush_btree, 0,
|
|
|
|
journal_max_cmp);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
bcache: fix high CPU occupancy during journal
After long time small writing I/O running, we found the occupancy of CPU
is very high and I/O performance has been reduced by about half:
[root@ceph151 internal]# top
top - 15:51:05 up 1 day,2:43, 4 users, load average: 16.89, 15.15, 16.53
Tasks: 2063 total, 4 running, 2059 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu(s):4.3 us, 17.1 sy 0.0 ni, 66.1 id, 12.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.5 si, 0.0 st
KiB Mem : 65450044 total, 24586420 free, 38909008 used, 1954616 buff/cache
KiB Swap: 65667068 total, 65667068 free, 0 used. 25136812 avail Mem
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
2023 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 55.1 0.0 0:04.42 kworker/11:191
14126 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 42.9 0.0 0:08.72 kworker/10:3
9292 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 30.4 0.0 1:10.99 kworker/6:1
8553 ceph 20 0 4242492 1.805g 18804 S 30.0 2.9 410:07.04 ceph-osd
12287 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 26.7 0.0 0:28.13 kworker/7:85
31019 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 26.1 0.0 1:30.79 kworker/22:1
1787 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 25.7 0.0 5:18.45 kworker/8:7
32169 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 14.5 0.0 1:01.92 kworker/23:1
21476 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 13.9 0.0 0:05.09 kworker/1:54
2204 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 12.5 0.0 1:25.17 kworker/9:10
16994 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 12.2 0.0 0:06.27 kworker/5:106
15714 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 10.9 0.0 0:01.85 kworker/19:2
9661 ceph 20 0 4246876 1.731g 18800 S 10.6 2.8 403:00.80 ceph-osd
11460 ceph 20 0 4164692 2.206g 18876 S 10.6 3.5 360:27.19 ceph-osd
9960 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 10.2 0.0 0:02.75 kworker/2:139
11699 ceph 20 0 4169244 1.920g 18920 S 10.2 3.1 355:23.67 ceph-osd
6843 ceph 20 0 4197632 1.810g 18900 S 9.6 2.9 380:08.30 ceph-osd
The kernel work consumed a lot of CPU, and I found they are running journal
work, The journal is reclaiming source and flush btree node with surprising
frequency.
Through further analysis, we found that in btree_flush_write(), we try to
get a btree node with the smallest fifo idex to flush by traverse all the
btree nodein c->bucket_hash, after we getting it, since no locker protects
it, this btree node may have been written to cache device by other works,
and if this occurred, we retry to traverse in c->bucket_hash and get
another btree node. When the problem occurrd, the retry times is very high,
and we consume a lot of CPU in looking for a appropriate btree node.
In this patch, we try to record 128 btree nodes with the smallest fifo idex
in heap, and pop one by one when we need to flush btree node. It greatly
reduces the time for the loop to find the appropriate BTREE node, and also
reduce the occupancy of CPU.
[note by mpl: this triggers a checkpatch error because of adjacent,
pre-existing style violations]
Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-02-08 03:41:40 +08:00
|
|
|
for (i = c->flush_btree.used / 2 - 1; i >= 0; --i)
|
|
|
|
heap_sift(&c->flush_btree, i, journal_min_cmp);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b = NULL;
|
|
|
|
heap_pop(&c->flush_btree, b, journal_min_cmp);
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&c->journal.lock);
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
if (b) {
|
2014-03-05 08:42:42 +08:00
|
|
|
mutex_lock(&b->write_lock);
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!btree_current_write(b)->journal) {
|
2014-03-05 08:42:42 +08:00
|
|
|
mutex_unlock(&b->write_lock);
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
/* We raced */
|
2018-02-08 03:41:39 +08:00
|
|
|
atomic_long_inc(&c->retry_flush_write);
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
goto retry;
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-03-05 08:42:42 +08:00
|
|
|
__bch_btree_node_write(b, NULL);
|
|
|
|
mutex_unlock(&b->write_lock);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define last_seq(j) ((j)->seq - fifo_used(&(j)->pin) + 1)
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-20 21:29:37 +08:00
|
|
|
static void journal_discard_endio(struct bio *bio)
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct journal_device *ja =
|
|
|
|
container_of(bio, struct journal_device, discard_bio);
|
|
|
|
struct cache *ca = container_of(ja, struct cache, journal);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
atomic_set(&ja->discard_in_flight, DISCARD_DONE);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
closure_wake_up(&ca->set->journal.wait);
|
|
|
|
closure_put(&ca->set->cl);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void journal_discard_work(struct work_struct *work)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct journal_device *ja =
|
|
|
|
container_of(work, struct journal_device, discard_work);
|
|
|
|
|
2016-06-06 03:31:41 +08:00
|
|
|
submit_bio(&ja->discard_bio);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void do_journal_discard(struct cache *ca)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct journal_device *ja = &ca->journal;
|
|
|
|
struct bio *bio = &ja->discard_bio;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!ca->discard) {
|
|
|
|
ja->discard_idx = ja->last_idx;
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-24 14:17:27 +08:00
|
|
|
switch (atomic_read(&ja->discard_in_flight)) {
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
case DISCARD_IN_FLIGHT:
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case DISCARD_DONE:
|
|
|
|
ja->discard_idx = (ja->discard_idx + 1) %
|
|
|
|
ca->sb.njournal_buckets;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
atomic_set(&ja->discard_in_flight, DISCARD_READY);
|
|
|
|
/* fallthrough */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case DISCARD_READY:
|
|
|
|
if (ja->discard_idx == ja->last_idx)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
atomic_set(&ja->discard_in_flight, DISCARD_IN_FLIGHT);
|
|
|
|
|
2016-11-22 23:57:21 +08:00
|
|
|
bio_init(bio, bio->bi_inline_vecs, 1);
|
2016-06-06 03:32:05 +08:00
|
|
|
bio_set_op_attrs(bio, REQ_OP_DISCARD, 0);
|
2013-10-12 06:44:27 +08:00
|
|
|
bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = bucket_to_sector(ca->set,
|
2013-03-26 02:46:44 +08:00
|
|
|
ca->sb.d[ja->discard_idx]);
|
2017-08-24 01:10:32 +08:00
|
|
|
bio_set_dev(bio, ca->bdev);
|
2013-10-12 06:44:27 +08:00
|
|
|
bio->bi_iter.bi_size = bucket_bytes(ca);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
bio->bi_end_io = journal_discard_endio;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
closure_get(&ca->set->cl);
|
|
|
|
INIT_WORK(&ja->discard_work, journal_discard_work);
|
|
|
|
schedule_work(&ja->discard_work);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void journal_reclaim(struct cache_set *c)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct bkey *k = &c->journal.key;
|
|
|
|
struct cache *ca;
|
|
|
|
uint64_t last_seq;
|
|
|
|
unsigned iter, n = 0;
|
|
|
|
atomic_t p;
|
|
|
|
|
2018-02-08 03:41:39 +08:00
|
|
|
atomic_long_inc(&c->reclaim);
|
|
|
|
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
while (!atomic_read(&fifo_front(&c->journal.pin)))
|
|
|
|
fifo_pop(&c->journal.pin, p);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
last_seq = last_seq(&c->journal);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Update last_idx */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for_each_cache(ca, c, iter) {
|
|
|
|
struct journal_device *ja = &ca->journal;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while (ja->last_idx != ja->cur_idx &&
|
|
|
|
ja->seq[ja->last_idx] < last_seq)
|
|
|
|
ja->last_idx = (ja->last_idx + 1) %
|
|
|
|
ca->sb.njournal_buckets;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for_each_cache(ca, c, iter)
|
|
|
|
do_journal_discard(ca);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (c->journal.blocks_free)
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
goto out;
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Allocate:
|
|
|
|
* XXX: Sort by free journal space
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for_each_cache(ca, c, iter) {
|
|
|
|
struct journal_device *ja = &ca->journal;
|
|
|
|
unsigned next = (ja->cur_idx + 1) % ca->sb.njournal_buckets;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* No space available on this device */
|
|
|
|
if (next == ja->discard_idx)
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ja->cur_idx = next;
|
2017-11-25 07:14:25 +08:00
|
|
|
k->ptr[n++] = MAKE_PTR(0,
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
bucket_to_sector(c, ca->sb.d[ja->cur_idx]),
|
|
|
|
ca->sb.nr_this_dev);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bkey_init(k);
|
|
|
|
SET_KEY_PTRS(k, n);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (n)
|
|
|
|
c->journal.blocks_free = c->sb.bucket_size >> c->block_bits;
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
out:
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!journal_full(&c->journal))
|
|
|
|
__closure_wake_up(&c->journal.wait);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void bch_journal_next(struct journal *j)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
atomic_t p = { 1 };
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
j->cur = (j->cur == j->w)
|
|
|
|
? &j->w[1]
|
|
|
|
: &j->w[0];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* The fifo_push() needs to happen at the same time as j->seq is
|
|
|
|
* incremented for last_seq() to be calculated correctly
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
BUG_ON(!fifo_push(&j->pin, p));
|
|
|
|
atomic_set(&fifo_back(&j->pin), 1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
j->cur->data->seq = ++j->seq;
|
2014-02-20 11:48:26 +08:00
|
|
|
j->cur->dirty = false;
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
j->cur->need_write = false;
|
|
|
|
j->cur->data->keys = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (fifo_full(&j->pin))
|
|
|
|
pr_debug("journal_pin full (%zu)", fifo_used(&j->pin));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-20 21:29:37 +08:00
|
|
|
static void journal_write_endio(struct bio *bio)
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct journal_write *w = bio->bi_private;
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-03 15:38:06 +08:00
|
|
|
cache_set_err_on(bio->bi_status, w->c, "journal io error");
|
2013-10-09 06:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
closure_put(&w->c->journal.io);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void journal_write(struct closure *);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void journal_write_done(struct closure *cl)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2013-10-09 06:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
struct journal *j = container_of(cl, struct journal, io);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
struct journal_write *w = (j->cur == j->w)
|
|
|
|
? &j->w[1]
|
|
|
|
: &j->w[0];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__closure_wake_up(&w->wait);
|
2013-10-09 06:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
continue_at_nobarrier(cl, journal_write, system_wq);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-12-17 07:27:25 +08:00
|
|
|
static void journal_write_unlock(struct closure *cl)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct cache_set *c = container_of(cl, struct cache_set, journal.io);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c->journal.io_in_flight = 0;
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&c->journal.lock);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
static void journal_write_unlocked(struct closure *cl)
|
2013-03-27 04:49:02 +08:00
|
|
|
__releases(c->journal.lock)
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2013-10-09 06:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
struct cache_set *c = container_of(cl, struct cache_set, journal.io);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
struct cache *ca;
|
|
|
|
struct journal_write *w = c->journal.cur;
|
|
|
|
struct bkey *k = &c->journal.key;
|
2013-12-18 15:49:49 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned i, sectors = set_blocks(w->data, block_bytes(c)) *
|
|
|
|
c->sb.block_size;
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct bio *bio;
|
|
|
|
struct bio_list list;
|
|
|
|
bio_list_init(&list);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!w->need_write) {
|
2013-12-17 07:27:25 +08:00
|
|
|
closure_return_with_destructor(cl, journal_write_unlock);
|
2015-03-06 23:37:46 +08:00
|
|
|
return;
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
} else if (journal_full(&c->journal)) {
|
|
|
|
journal_reclaim(c);
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&c->journal.lock);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
btree_flush_write(c);
|
|
|
|
continue_at(cl, journal_write, system_wq);
|
2015-03-06 23:37:46 +08:00
|
|
|
return;
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-12-18 15:49:49 +08:00
|
|
|
c->journal.blocks_free -= set_blocks(w->data, block_bytes(c));
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
w->data->btree_level = c->root->level;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bkey_copy(&w->data->btree_root, &c->root->key);
|
|
|
|
bkey_copy(&w->data->uuid_bucket, &c->uuid_bucket);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for_each_cache(ca, c, i)
|
|
|
|
w->data->prio_bucket[ca->sb.nr_this_dev] = ca->prio_buckets[0];
|
|
|
|
|
2013-11-01 06:46:42 +08:00
|
|
|
w->data->magic = jset_magic(&c->sb);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
w->data->version = BCACHE_JSET_VERSION;
|
|
|
|
w->data->last_seq = last_seq(&c->journal);
|
|
|
|
w->data->csum = csum_set(w->data);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < KEY_PTRS(k); i++) {
|
|
|
|
ca = PTR_CACHE(c, k, i);
|
|
|
|
bio = &ca->journal.bio;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
atomic_long_add(sectors, &ca->meta_sectors_written);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bio_reset(bio);
|
2013-10-12 06:44:27 +08:00
|
|
|
bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = PTR_OFFSET(k, i);
|
2017-08-24 01:10:32 +08:00
|
|
|
bio_set_dev(bio, ca->bdev);
|
2013-10-12 06:44:27 +08:00
|
|
|
bio->bi_iter.bi_size = sectors << 9;
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bio->bi_end_io = journal_write_endio;
|
|
|
|
bio->bi_private = w;
|
2016-06-06 03:32:05 +08:00
|
|
|
bio_set_op_attrs(bio, REQ_OP_WRITE,
|
2016-06-06 03:32:25 +08:00
|
|
|
REQ_SYNC|REQ_META|REQ_PREFLUSH|REQ_FUA);
|
2013-03-29 02:50:55 +08:00
|
|
|
bch_bio_map(bio, w->data);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
trace_bcache_journal_write(bio);
|
|
|
|
bio_list_add(&list, bio);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SET_PTR_OFFSET(k, i, PTR_OFFSET(k, i) + sectors);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ca->journal.seq[ca->journal.cur_idx] = w->data->seq;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
atomic_dec_bug(&fifo_back(&c->journal.pin));
|
|
|
|
bch_journal_next(&c->journal);
|
|
|
|
journal_reclaim(c);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&c->journal.lock);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while ((bio = bio_list_pop(&list)))
|
2013-11-24 15:11:25 +08:00
|
|
|
closure_bio_submit(bio, cl);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
continue_at(cl, journal_write_done, NULL);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void journal_write(struct closure *cl)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2013-10-09 06:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
struct cache_set *c = container_of(cl, struct cache_set, journal.io);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
spin_lock(&c->journal.lock);
|
|
|
|
journal_write_unlocked(cl);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
static void journal_try_write(struct cache_set *c)
|
2013-03-27 04:49:02 +08:00
|
|
|
__releases(c->journal.lock)
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2013-10-09 06:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
struct closure *cl = &c->journal.io;
|
|
|
|
struct journal_write *w = c->journal.cur;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
w->need_write = true;
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-12-17 07:27:25 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!c->journal.io_in_flight) {
|
|
|
|
c->journal.io_in_flight = 1;
|
|
|
|
closure_call(cl, journal_write_unlocked, NULL, &c->cl);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&c->journal.lock);
|
2013-12-17 07:27:25 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
static struct journal_write *journal_wait_for_write(struct cache_set *c,
|
|
|
|
unsigned nkeys)
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
size_t sectors;
|
|
|
|
struct closure cl;
|
2013-12-11 08:10:46 +08:00
|
|
|
bool wait = false;
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
closure_init_stack(&cl);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
spin_lock(&c->journal.lock);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while (1) {
|
|
|
|
struct journal_write *w = c->journal.cur;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sectors = __set_blocks(w->data, w->data->keys + nkeys,
|
2013-12-18 15:49:49 +08:00
|
|
|
block_bytes(c)) * c->sb.block_size;
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (sectors <= min_t(size_t,
|
|
|
|
c->journal.blocks_free * c->sb.block_size,
|
|
|
|
PAGE_SECTORS << JSET_BITS))
|
|
|
|
return w;
|
|
|
|
|
2013-12-11 08:10:46 +08:00
|
|
|
if (wait)
|
|
|
|
closure_wait(&c->journal.wait, &cl);
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!journal_full(&c->journal)) {
|
2013-12-11 08:10:46 +08:00
|
|
|
if (wait)
|
|
|
|
trace_bcache_journal_entry_full(c);
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* XXX: If we were inserting so many keys that they
|
|
|
|
* won't fit in an _empty_ journal write, we'll
|
|
|
|
* deadlock. For now, handle this in
|
|
|
|
* bch_keylist_realloc() - but something to think about.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
BUG_ON(!w->data->keys);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
journal_try_write(c); /* unlocks */
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2013-12-11 08:10:46 +08:00
|
|
|
if (wait)
|
|
|
|
trace_bcache_journal_full(c);
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
journal_reclaim(c);
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&c->journal.lock);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
btree_flush_write(c);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
closure_sync(&cl);
|
|
|
|
spin_lock(&c->journal.lock);
|
2013-12-11 08:10:46 +08:00
|
|
|
wait = true;
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-09 06:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
static void journal_write_work(struct work_struct *work)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct cache_set *c = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
|
|
|
|
struct cache_set,
|
|
|
|
journal.work);
|
|
|
|
spin_lock(&c->journal.lock);
|
2014-02-20 11:48:26 +08:00
|
|
|
if (c->journal.cur->dirty)
|
|
|
|
journal_try_write(c);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&c->journal.lock);
|
2013-10-09 06:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Entry point to the journalling code - bio_insert() and btree_invalidate()
|
|
|
|
* pass bch_journal() a list of keys to be journalled, and then
|
|
|
|
* bch_journal() hands those same keys off to btree_insert_async()
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
atomic_t *bch_journal(struct cache_set *c,
|
|
|
|
struct keylist *keys,
|
|
|
|
struct closure *parent)
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct journal_write *w;
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
atomic_t *ret;
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!CACHE_SYNC(&c->sb))
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
w = journal_wait_for_write(c, bch_keylist_nkeys(keys));
|
2013-04-27 06:39:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-12-18 13:56:21 +08:00
|
|
|
memcpy(bset_bkey_last(w->data), keys->keys, bch_keylist_bytes(keys));
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
w->data->keys += bch_keylist_nkeys(keys);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
ret = &fifo_back(&c->journal.pin);
|
|
|
|
atomic_inc(ret);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
if (parent) {
|
|
|
|
closure_wait(&w->wait, parent);
|
2013-10-09 06:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
journal_try_write(c);
|
2014-02-20 11:48:26 +08:00
|
|
|
} else if (!w->dirty) {
|
|
|
|
w->dirty = true;
|
2013-10-09 06:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
schedule_delayed_work(&c->journal.work,
|
|
|
|
msecs_to_jiffies(c->journal_delay_ms));
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&c->journal.lock);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&c->journal.lock);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2013-10-25 08:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void bch_journal_meta(struct cache_set *c, struct closure *cl)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct keylist keys;
|
|
|
|
atomic_t *ref;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bch_keylist_init(&keys);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ref = bch_journal(c, &keys, cl);
|
|
|
|
if (ref)
|
|
|
|
atomic_dec_bug(ref);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void bch_journal_free(struct cache_set *c)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
free_pages((unsigned long) c->journal.w[1].data, JSET_BITS);
|
|
|
|
free_pages((unsigned long) c->journal.w[0].data, JSET_BITS);
|
|
|
|
free_fifo(&c->journal.pin);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int bch_journal_alloc(struct cache_set *c)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct journal *j = &c->journal;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
spin_lock_init(&j->lock);
|
2013-10-09 06:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&j->work, journal_write_work);
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c->journal_delay_ms = 100;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
j->w[0].c = c;
|
|
|
|
j->w[1].c = c;
|
|
|
|
|
bcache: fix high CPU occupancy during journal
After long time small writing I/O running, we found the occupancy of CPU
is very high and I/O performance has been reduced by about half:
[root@ceph151 internal]# top
top - 15:51:05 up 1 day,2:43, 4 users, load average: 16.89, 15.15, 16.53
Tasks: 2063 total, 4 running, 2059 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu(s):4.3 us, 17.1 sy 0.0 ni, 66.1 id, 12.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.5 si, 0.0 st
KiB Mem : 65450044 total, 24586420 free, 38909008 used, 1954616 buff/cache
KiB Swap: 65667068 total, 65667068 free, 0 used. 25136812 avail Mem
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
2023 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 55.1 0.0 0:04.42 kworker/11:191
14126 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 42.9 0.0 0:08.72 kworker/10:3
9292 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 30.4 0.0 1:10.99 kworker/6:1
8553 ceph 20 0 4242492 1.805g 18804 S 30.0 2.9 410:07.04 ceph-osd
12287 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 26.7 0.0 0:28.13 kworker/7:85
31019 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 26.1 0.0 1:30.79 kworker/22:1
1787 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 25.7 0.0 5:18.45 kworker/8:7
32169 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 14.5 0.0 1:01.92 kworker/23:1
21476 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 13.9 0.0 0:05.09 kworker/1:54
2204 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 12.5 0.0 1:25.17 kworker/9:10
16994 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 12.2 0.0 0:06.27 kworker/5:106
15714 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 10.9 0.0 0:01.85 kworker/19:2
9661 ceph 20 0 4246876 1.731g 18800 S 10.6 2.8 403:00.80 ceph-osd
11460 ceph 20 0 4164692 2.206g 18876 S 10.6 3.5 360:27.19 ceph-osd
9960 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 10.2 0.0 0:02.75 kworker/2:139
11699 ceph 20 0 4169244 1.920g 18920 S 10.2 3.1 355:23.67 ceph-osd
6843 ceph 20 0 4197632 1.810g 18900 S 9.6 2.9 380:08.30 ceph-osd
The kernel work consumed a lot of CPU, and I found they are running journal
work, The journal is reclaiming source and flush btree node with surprising
frequency.
Through further analysis, we found that in btree_flush_write(), we try to
get a btree node with the smallest fifo idex to flush by traverse all the
btree nodein c->bucket_hash, after we getting it, since no locker protects
it, this btree node may have been written to cache device by other works,
and if this occurred, we retry to traverse in c->bucket_hash and get
another btree node. When the problem occurrd, the retry times is very high,
and we consume a lot of CPU in looking for a appropriate btree node.
In this patch, we try to record 128 btree nodes with the smallest fifo idex
in heap, and pop one by one when we need to flush btree node. It greatly
reduces the time for the loop to find the appropriate BTREE node, and also
reduce the occupancy of CPU.
[note by mpl: this triggers a checkpatch error because of adjacent,
pre-existing style violations]
Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2018-02-08 03:41:40 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!(init_heap(&c->flush_btree, 128, GFP_KERNEL)) ||
|
|
|
|
!(init_fifo(&j->pin, JOURNAL_PIN, GFP_KERNEL)) ||
|
2013-03-24 07:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
!(j->w[0].data = (void *) __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, JSET_BITS)) ||
|
|
|
|
!(j->w[1].data = (void *) __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, JSET_BITS)))
|
|
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|